SoftBonds
Posts: 862
Joined: 2/10/2012
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:
ORIGINAL: SoftBonds
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee
I am so fisking glad to know that the only things I should care about when voting are my gonads.
FFS people, maybe that is not my biggest concern.
quote:
women should not serve in combat
No they should not. Unless we have women-only units.
Donno if someone can ask Aswad to join this discussion, but for centuries Scandinavian women bore shields for their men, protecting them in combat.
Really? Yay for then.
quote:
Today women are just as fast, intelligent, and capable, and are a valued part of our military.
Are they? Why then are there different ASPT results?
quote:
The idea that 51% of the population should be excluded from consideration for our most important jobs is frankly silly. We need the best people we can get in the military, especially in combat jobs.
Aren't women the best baby factories? Where do you expect to find new baby factories for creating more persons for cannon fodder? Especially since my space-age uterine replicator has been denied?
quote:
As for women serving alongside men, yes, sometimes hanky-panky happens.
Not sometimes. It is rampant.
quote:
Even prostitution. Some women or men spread STD's through a swath of the population, and some women get pregnant. Those costs are worth it though, especially when you consider the alternative. Would you really rather our troops were only looking at the locals for sex? Sounds like a recipe for a lot of rapes, cultural problems, and PR nightmares to me. We have had enough problems with that in Iraq and elsewhere, and while I think the military does a better job than a lot of organizations in history, especially for their size, in a million man army, there are going to be bad apples.
I am sorry. What? It is okay that the women are sex objects because the waitresses are not? The troops should be looking at females for sexual relief? Umm. . . why is a women's only troop a bad idea? Because you need to get your rocks off?
quote:
Women are a lot less likely to sexually cause problems with the locals (at least in that way, I grant there are nations that have a problem with women in uniform...).
Yes. Women are sexual outlets for you. So you will use it. Do women ever become more than whores to you?
Wait, so you say women are baby-factories, but not sex objects?
I'm confused.
btw, regarding sexual hanky-panky being "rampant," I've been in the war zone, I've been on a ship on a 7 month deployment. Yes, it happens, but not as much as you seem to think.
Our soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines are much more disciplined and professional than you give them credit for. They care about their nation and their families back home. Yes, there are bad apples, it is pretty hard to muster over a million people into an organization and get 100% perfect people. But the idea that all our warriors are doing when in mixed sex units is screwing is an insult to our bravest citizens. The folks who have made out a check for "whatever it takes, up to and including my life," in payment for your right to say what you want on an internet forum.
The idea that we should exclude some of the people willing to make that deal for something as silly as what is between their legs (or per your argument, the ability to be baby factories), is kinda an insult to both women and the military.
_____________________________
Elite Thread Hijacker!
Ignored: ThompsonX, RealOne (so folks know why I don't reply)
The last poster is often not the "winner," of the thread, just the one who was most annoying.
|
GOP Congressman Tells Women To Give Their Money To Demo... - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread