kalikshama
Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
I go one further.
If a woman or family is on assistance and has at least 2 children, I'd say make family planning not only free but MANDATORY. That's right kiddies. You heard it right here first. I'd a lot rather my tax dollars pay for a coupla gyn visits a year and free norplants than to pay for the feeding and education of the brats that some bint squirts out every 10 months.
If they want to claim I'm stepping on their religious freedom, then let them get OFF assistance and The Church can pay for the care, feeding and schooling of "God's Gift".
I think it's morally wrong to deliberately conceive if you cannot afford children at the time of conception.
I'm a little queasy at the idea of mandated Norplant, as there are side effects, but am for the general concept.
I believe education and access to birth control should be increased, and the gap between the "perfect use" for condoms of 2% and the "typical use" of 10-18% decreased.
_____________________________
Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036
|
RE: Is UNFETTERED ACCESS to family planning services (i... - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread