|
DarkSteven -> RE: Fraudulent Identities (3/25/2012 7:46:16 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Looking4sxslaves
To The Reader,
I have noticed here that the the girls have posted alot in their Journals for their profiles that they have recieved hundreds of messages in a matter of a few minutes, and I have been considering how this could be happening. It is highly doubtful that those girls are actually recieving that many messages.
Based on what, pray tell? quote:
What is more than likely happening here is a software macro (Machine Automated Command Repeat Order). Since not everyone knows how to do this, especially with compatible code here on this site and server, I see a couple of things that are more than likely what is actually happening here. One, these profiles that are messaging the new member profiles, and indeed profiles with specific attributes, on a regularly shceduled basis are more than likely from one, or potentially a few, member(s) that have a desire to increase their odds of finding someone. Of course the result of this is the
presentation of fraudulent identity. Now we all know that this is illegal.
Please tell me you are not serious. You're trying to act like you're an authority, and you are not seeing any difference between a profile here, and a legal identity complete with SSN? quote:
People are not allowed to present themselves as anyone other than who they actually are and it be within the boundries of legal actions. Fraud is illegal. There are some that argue that they have the right to present themselves as anyone they want to, and indeed they do, but not when presenting the identity as an actual identity rather than a ficticious identity.
I know a woman in Colorado who decided to have two profiles, one presenting herself as a Domme and another as a sub. Feel free to contact me and I will give you the profile names, and you can call the FBI and report her and see what happens. I'll also throw in someone else who was locked out of her profile and started another, as well as some who decided to start up profiles under new names because collarme won't allow renaming. Knock yourself out. quote:
I suppose anyone with software sense that knows how to compose code association as a run could analyze this site and write a macro, but the Collar Me site itself should easily become aware that the macro is taking place. This is basically facilitation the perpertration of the presentation of fraudulent identity. This indicates that the site admin is among the perpertration of what's happening here, or for some reason or another they have provided a clearance for this action to occur on this site.
You're claiming that a problem exists based on women stating they get lotsa messages. You're analyzing the problem based on no real evidence, and diagnosing it based on who knows what. Next, you're falsely claiming it's illegal and stating that it MUST BE dealt with by the site, and you want it to be a top priority for collarme. You conclude that because the site management has not dealt with your delusion, that they must be in cahoots with the vile macro people. quote:
Even if it were law enforcement performing this fraud, they are well aware that virtual identity constitutes tangible identity. Just ask the banks and credit card companies if a virtual identity constitutes an actual identity, they will tell you that it always has, and always will. What I don't understand is why this site has chosen to allow users to run a MACRO messageing SPAM (Simultaneous Programed Automated Messages) program harassing other users. In a manner of speaking harassment is all it is. I don't send out 200 messages to the same person while pretending that I am one of 200 different people on the off chance there will be a response to at least one, and then say that I am that person that recieved a response. I only have a single profile. I don't pretend to be anyone other than myself. Anyway, seems to me like this site would find a way to stop from helping people to break laws.
1. CM accounts cannot open bank accounts and are not as valid as real people.
2. You are claiming that the site has an obligation to stop macros with no proof it's happening.
3. Please prove that the messages are not generated by lots of individuals.
4. Please specify which laws are being broken. Harassment is sketchy, and the possibility would exist based on humans and not macros messaging, simply at a lesser rate.
|
|
|
|
