Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

House passes bill banning protests...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> House passes bill banning protests... Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 5:03:45 PM   
provfivetine


Posts: 410
Joined: 2/17/2011
Status: offline
Link

quote:

The US House of Representatives voted 388-to-3 in favor of H.R. 347 late Monday, a bill which is being dubbed the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. In the bill, Congress officially makes it illegal to trespass on the grounds of the White House, which, on the surface, seems not just harmless and necessary, but somewhat shocking that such a rule isn’t already on the books. The wording in the bill, however, extends to allow the government to go after much more than tourists that transverse the wrought iron White House fence. Under the act, the government is also given the power to bring charges against Americans engaged in political protest anywhere in the country.

The new legislation allows prosecutors to charge anyone who enters a building without permission or with the intent to disrupt a government function with a federal offense if Secret Service is on the scene, but the law stretches to include not just the president’s palatial Pennsylvania Avenue home. Under the law, any building or grounds where the president is visiting — even temporarily — is covered, as is any building or grounds “restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance."


Good thing we have a progressive president who will veto bills that violate civil liberties.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 5:10:16 PM   
SoftBonds


Posts: 862
Joined: 2/10/2012
Status: offline
Yipes, first the patriot act, now this?
Who was it who said "those who will trade their freedom for security deserve neither"?

_____________________________

Elite Thread Hijacker!
Ignored: ThompsonX, RealOne (so folks know why I don't reply)

The last poster is often not the "winner," of the thread, just the one who was most annoying.

(in reply to provfivetine)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 5:12:37 PM   
provfivetine


Posts: 410
Joined: 2/17/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds
Who was it who said "those who will trade their freedom for security deserve neither"?


Benjamin Franklin.

(in reply to SoftBonds)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 5:20:04 PM   
ClassIsInSession


Posts: 305
Joined: 7/26/2010
Status: offline
If you look at everything that has happened over the last 12+ years from a military perspective you could assume that the U.S. government has unofficially declared war on the American people.

Our current economy is like economic sanctions we put on other countries. Thereby weakening the financial strength and resolve.
Having the TSA and DHS in place is the beginning of restricting travel.
SOPA/PIPA cranks down on freedom of speech and weakens communications
The Patriot Act ended our privacy.
The Defense Authorization Act eliminates our right to a free trial.
Leiberman is also trying to pass a bill that would strip an American of citizenship if the government deemed them a threat, with very vague wording on what a threat is.

If you look back in history at what Germany did to Russia...it was much the same, block trade routes, starve them locked in their own homes.

It very well could be we are on the verge of a true martial law situation.

(in reply to provfivetine)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 5:22:30 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
Yeah? And you think this will stop what?
It'll be nice to be charged with something a little more descriptive than "trespassing" and "unpermitted camping".

BTW - It's not a free ride through the Senate.
Not as of today anyway.

And WHERE Pray Tell was Ron Paul's PRESS CONFERENCE OUTSIDE THE CAPITAL... Anybody even check to see if the sterile CooKoo was in DC when this was going down?



_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to provfivetine)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 6:15:30 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
yeah,.. the "Land of the Free" has not been free for some time now.. its a Police State..

only rich people will have the money to buy their freedom & escape..if they are lucky...

Unless the govt uses forfeiture laws to strip people of money and assets even if not charged with a crime so they cant even hire a lawyer to defend themselves..

and now armed IRS agents are hunting Americans in other countries.. You cant even move out of the US without the US still having their claws into you..

I would not want my children born into perpetual American servitude..

And there will be more laws and more laws restricting you more and more.. but sheeple are sheeple and they cry that "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear"..

oh yeah,.. and Obama wants to throw people in jail that the govt thinks might do something wrong.. his Precrime "Prolonged Detention"..

Its not my country,.. I suppose I shouldnt care what Americans do in their country.. but that dark ooze is slowly spreading around the world.. and I dont like that..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to ClassIsInSession)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 6:28:28 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds

Yipes, first the patriot act, now this?
Who was it who said "those who will trade their freedom for security deserve neither"?


“Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security”

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to SoftBonds)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 7:14:21 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper


BTW - It's not a free ride through the Senate.
Not as of today anyway.





No, it went through the Senate a couple weeks back.

Are you getting your info from the same source Owner59 had for his fakegate thread, or do you just make shit up?


Bill Summary & Status 112th Congress (2011 - 2012) H.R.347All Information

quote:

2/6/2012:
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S358; text as passed Senate: CR S358)


_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 7:47:54 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Some things just amuse the hell out of me on a thread like this, other things, not so much. That this computer is allergic to Adobe, so I can't get the actual text of the bill off the Library of Congress site is surefire to annoy, and having the initial data presented off a breathless, no-name site of unknown credibility just asks for the demagoguery of the dumbasses to descend.

The official summary says this (my bold):

quote:

Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011 - Amends the federal criminal code to revise the prohibition against entering restricted federal buildings or grounds to impose criminal penalties on anyone who knowingly enters any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority. Defines "restricted buildings or grounds" as a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of: (1) the White House or its grounds or the Vice President's official residence or its grounds, (2) a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting, or (3) a building or grounds so restricted due to a special event of national significance.


Without being able to read the text, I see where this makes it a crime to sneak in, not where it becomes a crime buy a ticket, to make your stink.

I'm about as big a fan of free speech as you are likely to find, but I also rank the physical protection of the President as a solid gray area of it.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to provfivetine)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 7:48:39 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
And just so it's "mystery" is dissipated before the local brain trust turns it into more than a tidbit some other Obama hater got to before them and didn't expand upon enough... Here's the text of the bill in it's entirety:

Amends the federal criminal code to revise the prohibition against entering restricted federal buildings or grounds to impose criminal penalties on anyone who knowingly enters any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority. Defines "restricted buildings or grounds" as a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of: (1) the White House or its grounds or the Vice President's official residence or its grounds, (2) a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting, or (3) a building or grounds so restricted due to a special event of national significance.

Boy ... What a fucking smoking gun this one is... If you jump the rail when the President is at a function, you get arrested? You think that somehow you weren't before this? The difference is the Secret Service can now charge you with something. This has been a huge complaint within the agency for decades.
So basically, if a protester wants to take it to the next level... they have prior knowledge what they're facing.


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 7:51:57 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

Wouldn't want you to miss the question, Sternskipper.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper


BTW - It's not a free ride through the Senate. Not as of today anyway.

No, it went through the Senate a couple weeks back.

Are you getting your info from the same source Owner59 had for his fakegate thread, or do you just make shit up?

Bill Summary & Status 112th Congress (2011 - 2012) H.R.347All Information


My understanding of the law is that it's just another minor affront.
What I'd like to know is why this thing disappeared back in the fall and came back scaring the pants off the Ron Paul people...
Whatever the weenie thinks this means is his (or your mutual, depending on the straw) private weirdness. I am good with the fact that it's not the law the Lunatics are making it out to be.



Care to try again? The OP link said it had passed the Senate on Feb. 6 as well as the Library of Congress site.

You also might want to learn the difference between the text, and the summary. That can matter quite a bit.

< Message edited by TheHeretic -- 2/28/2012 7:57:02 PM >


_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 8:17:26 PM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
I can't imagine that the people's right to peaceable assembly can be overturned that easily and with such a decisive vote.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 8:25:10 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I can't imagine that the people's right to peaceable assembly can be overturned that easily and with such a decisive vote.


Steven, we apparently missed the cuckoo-ese hidden language where this wasn't just about securing the safety of the president with an arrestable offense. Only 'special' people can read those parts.


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 8:33:39 PM   
SoftBonds


Posts: 862
Joined: 2/10/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

I can't imagine that the people's right to peaceable assembly can be overturned that easily and with such a decisive vote.


Steven, we apparently missed the cuckoo-ese hidden language where this wasn't just about securing the safety of the president with an arrestable offense. Only 'special' people can read those parts.



Actually there is a special word that the Illuminati have trained most people from birth to instictively avoid. By putting that word on either side of a phrase, you can make a sentence effectively invisible as people's eyes avoid the special word.
But if you put on glasses, then wrap duct tape around the sides, and then put a light blue filter, you can see the word. I will type it at the bottom of this post. If you still can't see it you got the wrong color filter.
Anyway, I bet that is what they did with the dangerous language. They just have to take out the special word, and the remaining text will become visible, and be clearly passed law.
Thank goodness some folks have those special glasses...


Oh yeah, the word is:

_____________________________

Elite Thread Hijacker!
Ignored: ThompsonX, RealOne (so folks know why I don't reply)

The last poster is often not the "winner," of the thread, just the one who was most annoying.

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 9:32:26 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:


Actually there is a special word that the Illuminati have trained most people from birth to instictively avoid. By putting that word on either side of a phrase, you can make a sentence effectively invisible as people's eyes avoid the special word.


Lemme guess... You're attending classes at Evergreen in Eugene, Aren't you? Please give Kenn Babbs my warmest regards. He's a terrific novelist and one hell of a nice guy.
If I had my fondest wish granted my friend? It would be to know the secret of how some of them EVEN CONSTRUCT SENTENCES on the fumes they're running on.


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to SoftBonds)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 9:47:55 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
That's an interesting shift, from where you were with your first post, Softbonds.

Anytime you want to make comparisons to the Patriot Act, do try to recall that, so far, we get it with a sunset clause.

The word you were looking for, I suspect, was "reality." The devil is in the details, and before I completely write this thing off, it would be nice to know what the thing actually says. I'll snag the wife's laptop, after she goes to bed, for a peek at that pdf file.

Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to SoftBonds)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/28/2012 10:06:42 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds

Yipes, first the patriot act, now this?
Who was it who said "those who will trade their freedom for security deserve neither"?

We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals ~Barack Obama

K.

(in reply to SoftBonds)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/29/2012 7:11:57 AM   
SoftBonds


Posts: 862
Joined: 2/10/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:


Actually there is a special word that the Illuminati have trained most people from birth to instictively avoid. By putting that word on either side of a phrase, you can make a sentence effectively invisible as people's eyes avoid the special word.


Lemme guess... You're attending classes at Evergreen in Eugene, Aren't you? Please give Kenn Babbs my warmest regards. He's a terrific novelist and one hell of a nice guy.
If I had my fondest wish granted my friend? It would be to know the secret of how some of them EVEN CONSTRUCT SENTENCES on the fumes they're running on.



Actually I play GURPS, so I have (among other sourcebooks) the Illuminati book. Doesn't mean I believe it, but it is lots of fun...

_____________________________

Elite Thread Hijacker!
Ignored: ThompsonX, RealOne (so folks know why I don't reply)

The last poster is often not the "winner," of the thread, just the one who was most annoying.

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/29/2012 7:18:45 AM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Actually I play GURPS, so I have (among other sourcebooks) the Illuminati book. Doesn't mean I believe it, but it is lots of fun...


That's cool... I wasn't taking you seriously.... I still remember passing the glassed in room at IBM where the guys with the bottomless break would sit there aggressively playing magic thinking "Thank god I am addicted to nicotine".


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to SoftBonds)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: House passes bill banning protests... - 2/29/2012 7:26:40 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
GURPS is an RPG, not a card game.
(Though the Illuminati supplement is spun off from a very funny card game the publisher used to do...)

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> House passes bill banning protests... Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.297