|
SilverBoat -> RE: Santorum Upsets G.O.P. Race With Three Victories (2/8/2012 6:23:30 AM)
|
How much the 'news' about political issues, candidates, elections, etc consists of hyper-dramatized 'narratives', speculation, and opinion instead of merely facts about the events? During the last six months there've been at least a half-dozen 'front-runners' proclaimed by the media-'expert' talking-heads, and now over half of them have imploded or dropped out. What does that really leave their so-called 'expertise'? Sure, there's a complex of psycho-social phenomena that often makes 'story-telling' more profitable than factual analysis, as least as far as advertisers and commercial media are concerned. Heck, over half the human population still buys into twisted 'religious' narratives; they've been inculcated since birth to view reality through dogmatic filters that promise punishments or rewards for following along with storylines that just happen to reinforce the 'authoritative' heirarchy. And it's not like most of the candidates don't pretty much continuously violate honesty for the sake of psychosocial rhetoric. The 'media' and their 'experts' aren't really much better, and arguably might be a lot worse. Anybody want to bet that the pundits will be trumpeting predictions of electoral-dominance for whichever Ripuglican wins the next round?
|
|
|
|