|
SternSkipper -> RE: New First Amendment Case Brewing (10/26/2011 12:40:17 PM)
|
quote:
If you hadn't truncated my post when quoting it, the very next sentence would have clarified that the losses were his job. He did not pay for the election to be held, and thus has no standing to complain about those. And the costs of campaigning, if that's what you're referring to, were a given expense to keep the job. So lost wages... sorry I didn't remember that and apparently didn't highlight enough... my question probably changed as a result of that the way my network was working last night with all the video streams coming in... so anyway lost wages and costs ... IF he can prove anything beyond a lie... which is probably the easiest.
|
|
|
|