ChatteParfaitt
Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011 From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nobthebuilder Hi there, and interesting scenario here for you. I have been talking to someone and she has stated that she wants extreme cyber conversation. we have covered many subject around pain, peeing and pregnancy along with including other men. Conversations have flowed on some of the subjects but not all in one go so to speak.. So I start with a scene that is extreme, warn her of the foundation of it and then I don't like one particular thing and runs of.. Is there no pleasing some subs ???? ha ha oh well , rant over. There is so much wrong with the above I'm not sure where to start, so I'll begin with the subject line. How do you judge levels of perversion? People with experience (real time experience, not cyber) are going to have their own score card. A way to get started with someone new is to have the both of your fill out a BDSM check sheet. An example: http://www.bdsm-education.com/checklist.html Filling this out together should engender much needed conversation to see if you are both on the same page kink wise and intensity wise. The OP started an "extreme" online scene and his cyber sub bolted. This is not new or interesting to those of us who are not into cyber b/c we live BDSM day to day in our real lives. It is, however, a great example of what not to do. Which is to scene with someone when you don't know their head enough to do it successfully. It's the dominant's responsibility to know their sub. It's the sub's responsibility to be obedient. Neither of those two things appeared to have happened.
< Message edited by ChatteParfaitt -- 10/9/2011 6:00:53 AM >
_____________________________
|