RE: CNN + Tea Party = ?

RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

SternSkipper -> RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (9/13/2011 3:19:31 PM)
quote: Never trusted those chaps, simply for that fact. He and Perry BOTH looked like they were deliberately taking a fall at times last night... Perry standing there nodding like a fucking bobblehead every time Mitt made a point to the audience that wasn't aimed at him. And Paul getting almost spooky weird when people confronted him or he went on the offensive. I am convinced now that Perry is absolutely a paid decoy for Romney and came in to cost the other candidates and then to fall quietly by the wayside. The whole thing has become a circus of douche-baggery

Lucylastic -> RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (9/13/2011 3:21:31 PM)
they had their collars buttoned too tight, it was cutting off the flow to the big head... they looked like they had poles stuck up thier spines(instead of their arses for a nice change), didnt seem their necks worked properly.. maybe it was just me

Lucylastic -> RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (9/13/2011 3:33:30 PM)
the more I learn about libertarianism, the more I dislike it. And its hard core adherents

outhere69 -> RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (9/13/2011 3:43:43 PM)
Too bad they didn't have a fact-check crew in the back that could feed the info to Wolf, since there were some wicked howlers.

SternSkipper -> RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (9/13/2011 3:44:23 PM)
quote: the more I learn about libertarianism, the more I dislike it. And its hard core adherents When I meet two that have the same understanding of libertarian philosophy in the same week, I'll let you know[:)]

Lucylastic -> RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (9/13/2011 3:51:50 PM)
Outhere, I totally agree with you, having fact checkers should be at EVERY debate and meeting... LOL they get away with far too much bullshit..that goes for ALLL politicians BTW not just people I wont vote for. Stern, Thats why I cant handle long drawn out philosphical discussions. Too much pontificating and no hard facts. its like mental ex lax. Irritates the shit outta me

SternSkipper -> RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (9/13/2011 3:54:58 PM)
quote: Too bad they didn't have a fact-check crew in the back that could feed the info to Wolf, since there were some wicked howlers. The debate would have taken an extra two hours. You're right though. The real hooter I find is their claim that if the tax cuts and deregulation (I'm presuming they mean the kind of de-regulation that allowed for fucking scifi shit like derivatives), that suddenly SOMEDAY there will be jobs a-plenty and the middle class' luster will be restored. It's like believing a member of the village people if they told ya they won't cum in your mouth

SternSkipper -> RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (9/13/2011 4:01:37 PM)
quote: Outhere, I totally agree with you, having fact checkers should be at EVERY debate and meeting... LOL they get away with far too much bullshit..that goes for ALLL politicians BTW not just people I wont vote for. When it came to the medical insurance issue Romney LIED LIKE A FUCKING RUG, if anything, non-compliance with Romney-Care carries a swifter and heavier penalty than non-participation in the national program... and that's just the tip of the iceberg. Being from Massachusetts and having had to deal with Masshealth for a time, I can tell you just how full of shit the guy is on that issue.

StrangerThan -> RE: CNN + Tea Party = ? (9/14/2011 3:38:59 AM)
Money http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/cnn-tea-party-debate-delivers-rare-ratings-victory-205223226.html

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875