RE: taken in hand its own category? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


LadyPact -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:12:17 PM)

LaT, I'm sure that when the site was created, the powers that be had intended the "Old Guard" category to be somewhat synonymous with leather.  The hang up to this is that many of us don't see the terms as the same thing.  For example, while I identify as a leather person, I don't claim Old Guard because I'm not male, not gay, and I didn't get into kink in the post WW2 era.  If I did, I know a number of leather people that would slap Me upside the head.




Arpig -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:12:31 PM)

quote:

but i would think all gor females would see themselves as slaves.
And you would be wrong.




Icarys -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:13:43 PM)

I'd like to get a Fat Bitches category.

(General discussion that pertains to them: Food, Clothing, Snacks they like, Men who like them, Diets, How many times a day they eat, belly-roll sex yes.....even exercise that they like, if they must.)




LaTigresse -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:14:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

LaT, I'm sure that when the site was created, the powers that be had intended the "Old Guard" category to be somewhat synonymous with leather.  The hang up to this is that many of us don't see the terms as the same thing.  For example, while I identify as a leather person, I don't claim Old Guard because I'm not male, not gay, and I didn't get into kink in the post WW2 era.  If I did, I know a number of leather people that would slap Me upside the head.


Ya. I am pretty clueless about both but I know enough to be dangerous. I know that the two, while they can be intertwined, are not the same thing. At least that is how I understand it...




LadyHibiscus -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:18:23 PM)

I always gigglesnort when someone says they are OG. That they follow OG ideals, cool. Otherwise? They better be collecting social security!




PreciousT -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:20:01 PM)

well when i see 1950's I do tend to think of a situation where the women stays home does not work and is generally inclined to take care of all the domestic chores. There are 12 lifestyle categories there now, i don't think its a terrible idea to add one more. its a legitimate sub branch.
yes many people put in in their profile so many in fact that i think it should be added as its own lifestyle category.




PreciousT -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:22:54 PM)

i said think i don't think that statement is so out there. there are always one or two exceptions but do you really want to debate that slave is not an appropriate tittle for a person living the a gorean lifestyle?




Arpig -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:25:48 PM)

Well you see, there's the rub. You have preconceived notions regarding each possible descriptor.
Now when I think of "Taken in hand" I think of right-wing politics and evangelical Christianity merged together into a vaguely kinky sex life.

Click on "Support" at the bottom of the sign in page and one of the categories is "Feature suggestion"




LaTigresse -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:27:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PreciousT

i said think i don't think that statement is so out there. there are always one or two exceptions but do you really want to debate that slave is not an appropriate tittle for a person living the a gorean lifestyle?


I am quite certain that there are quite a few people haunting these boards that would debate the topic with you. Including women that have lived as gorean slaves.




Arpig -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:28:21 PM)

quote:

i said think i don't think that statement is so out there. there are always one or two exceptions but do you really want to debate that slave is not an appropriate tittle for a person living the a gorean lifestyle?
Yes I do. There are Gorean "free women" and even Gorean females slave owners. As stupid as i think the whole Gorean thing is, it is more than just "women are slaves", there is a LOT more to it than that.






PreciousT -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:42:00 PM)

i said that slave was an appropriate a category for a women who wanted to define herself who was in the Gorean lifestyle and i stand by that. thank you for telling me about that feature on the web page i did not see that and i will use it. this post was was put up because i believe that there are very many profiles of women who are looking for taken in hand relationships. post has only been here a short time its quite possible that there is not enough support for adding it to the lifestyles section at this time however its still really early. I think there is room for it and it would be a beneficial feature to have.




Arpig -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:46:35 PM)

quote:

i said that slave was an appropriate a category for a women who wanted to define herself who was in the Gorean lifestyle and i stand by that
No you did not. Not even close to what you said. It may have be what you now wish you had said but it isn't. What you said was:
quote:

I guess to me when I think slave I think Gorean lifestyle but I can see where not all slaves are gor, but i would think all gor females would see themselves as slaves. currently you can check gorean lifestyle in the lifestyle section of interests i just think taken in hand should be added to that list and wanted to post to see if there was support for the idea or not.
Nothing in there about a woman who wanted to define herself any way, just an erroneous statement that ALL Gor females would see themselves as slaves.




LadyPact -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:50:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PreciousT
i said that slave was an appropriate a category for a women who wanted to define herself who was in the Gorean lifestyle and i stand by that.

Please do go to the Gorean forum and do a search for the terms "Free Woman" and "Free Companion".  I'm sure that you will find a good deal of information that will enlighten you.




tolovetolaugh -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:51:37 PM)

What is "taken in hand" ?





PreciousT -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:58:06 PM)

you guys are splitting hairs. your taking it and extrapolating it to a point where you can find some kind of fault with what i have said. that's fine everyone is allowed to enjoy themselves in the manner that makes them happy. going back and forth with people does not do it for me. however slave is a perfectly acceptable and common term for a female slave in the gorean lifestyle. if you want to bring up special exceptions and special cases that's fine but it does not make my statement inaccurate. i feel like i am being pecked at by a gaggle of small birds who just like to debate. the whole post is getting a little derailed at this point.
maybe some others who think taken in hand should have its own category will step up and post if not i have said my peace and i am leaving it here.




domiguy -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 1:59:04 PM)

A person that loves to give vigorous hand jobs.




domiguy -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 2:00:30 PM)

WHAT IN THE FUCK IS TAKEN IN HAND?




tolovetolaugh -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 2:10:59 PM)

quote:


_____________________________

It was a couple of days before Easter '72. The last of NVA's artillery rounds had slammed directly into our bunker. All hope was lost until Combat Army Medic Wilbur pulled me out of the rubble and led me to safety. Wilbur a true American Hero!!!
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

WHAT IN THE FUCK IS TAKEN IN HAND?


That's what i asked!!!

But um... you guess seems a bit wrong... I just can't quite grasp it...





BossyShoeBitch -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 2:23:39 PM)

Taken in Hand refers to Domestic Discipline.




LaTigresse -> RE: taken in hand its own category? (9/1/2011 2:35:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PreciousT

you guys are splitting hairs. your taking it and extrapolating it to a point where you can find some kind of fault with what i have said. that's fine everyone is allowed to enjoy themselves in the manner that makes them happy. going back and forth with people does not do it for me. however slave is a perfectly acceptable and common term for a female slave in the gorean lifestyle. if you want to bring up special exceptions and special cases that's fine but it does not make my statement inaccurate. i feel like i am being pecked at by a gaggle of small birds who just like to debate. the whole post is getting a little derailed at this point.
maybe some others who think taken in hand should have its own category will step up and post if not i have said my peace and i am leaving it here.


So us debating the definitions you give as gorean is splitting hairs but you saying that your precious taken in hand is so very different than anything already available is not.......gotcha!




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875