RE: Obama Gets Teabagged

RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

DomYngBlk -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 10:57:53 AM)
Dubya is running again? OH , thats right he didn't smoke him out! lol

joether -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 11:15:04 AM)
I kind of laughed watching the tea bagger make an ass of himself. He tried to berate the President over something the Republican Party failed to do for eight years while George W. Bush was in office. The 'balanced budget amendment'? How the hell did the US Budget get out of whack in the first place? Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit. An each year, that deficit was paid from with borrowed money. An how often did conservatives hold their own party accountible and responsible? That's why its easy to undermine most tea baggers on the concept of being 'fiscal conservative'. All those fiscal conservatives voted Republican in lockstep with other conservatives and never questioned let alone rebelled against voting Republican. Likewise, when did Vice President Biden call 'the right' or 'conservatives', terrorists? Got a video?

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 11:15:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl She comes across as the epitome of a good christian wife. I have no evidence to the contrary. She also comes across as what the conservative movement wants in a candidate. Again, no evidence to the contrary. Many, many people have complained about Obama bow and scraping... about Bush doing the same... about the lack of spine of both and many other Presidents. Yet, they are willing to elect a woman who openly admits to these traits? If her husband decides one day that she should quit.. will she? Its one thing to speculate about the actions and motivations of a President. Its another thing knowing them before they are President and voting them in anyways. I`m voting for the man who got osama bin-laden....nuff said I didnt know the leader of the Seal Team was running.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 11:16:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: joether Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit. Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008.

Marc2b -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 11:28:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I open my email this morning and what do I see, This... [image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/heeee1.jpg[/image] Theres not much more I can say until I stop laughing Have a great day chaps!!! This gives me a wicked idea. [sm=evil.gif] I dunno if it will work or not [sm=dunno.gif]... but I think it's worth the try.

DomKen -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 1:35:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: joether Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit. Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008. Weird how the numbers show it differently Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars) 1999 2106.11 2000 2284.56 2001 2196.46 2002 2011.72 2003 1894.06 2004 1942.84 2005 2153.61 2006 2330.94 2007 2420.48 2008 2326.63 2009 1917.81

rulemylife -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 2:12:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Called on his administrations two-faced hypocrisy Keep in mind this is on his "listening tour" as you watch the video http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/08/obama-clashes-with-tea-party-member/1 Do you ever read or listen to your own links? Or do you just post them based on the headline?

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 2:19:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: joether Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit. Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008. Weird how the numbers show it differently Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars) 1999 2106.11 2000 2284.56 2001 2196.46 2002 2011.72 2003 1894.06 2004 1942.84 2005 2153.61 2006 2330.94 2007 2420.48 2008 2326.63 2009 1917.81 funny but I always thought that 2420>2331>2154>1943>1894. "The economy's performance since the 2003 tax cuts went into effect has been stunning. The unemployment rate has fallen to from 6.3 percent to 4.7 percent-well below the historical average. Companies and entrepreneurs have created 5.7 million new jobs, including another 128,000 in August. And the typical unemployed worker now needs three fewer weeks to find a job than in June 2003. The 2003 tax cuts lowered taxes on savings and investment, making it easier for workers to save for the future and reducing the cost of investment. The consequences have been dramatic. Since June 2003, investment in the economy has surged by 28 percent in real terms and is higher now than during the late 1990s. The stock market has also recovered, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 2,500 points in since June of 2003. With tens of millions of American workers owning stocks through 401(k) plans, these gains have been broadly shared throughout the economy."

slvemike4u -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 2:20:53 PM)
Did I miss something,one minute DomKen is schooling locked over the Chinese Navy...the next Ron and Tazzy are going on about batshit crazy Michele....there is something amiss here.

tazzygirl -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 2:32:48 PM)
I think it was a mix up in threads, Mike. I do remember asking a question about her "submissive" wife bs, but it must have been on another thread. It happens.

mnottertail -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 3:00:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Did I miss something,one minute DomKen is schooling locked over the Chinese Navy...the next Ron and Tazzy are going on about batshit crazy Michele....there is something amiss here. Hey, Ken adequately described the situation where Chinese Junks are Hauling Chines Junk. A perfect segue into Michelles BigPolishCock fetish. International theme....you know, right? This is a sex site, right? I mean I did get that part right, didn't I?

Sanity -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 3:30:51 PM)
- Yes, Obama sucks Tea Partiers balls... I think its hilarious too [:D] quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I open my email this morning and what do I see, This... [image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/heeee1.jpg[/image] Theres not much more I can say until I stop laughing Have a great day chaps!!!

DomKen -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 3:41:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: joether Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit. Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008. Weird how the numbers show it differently Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars) 1999 2106.11 2000 2284.56 2001 2196.46 2002 2011.72 2003 1894.06 2004 1942.84 2005 2153.61 2006 2330.94 2007 2420.48 2008 2326.63 2009 1917.81 funny but I always thought that 2420>2331>2154>1943>1894. "The economy's performance since the 2003 tax cuts went into effect has been stunning. The unemployment rate has fallen to from 6.3 percent to 4.7 percent-well below the historical average. Companies and entrepreneurs have created 5.7 million new jobs, including another 128,000 in August. And the typical unemployed worker now needs three fewer weeks to find a job than in June 2003. The 2003 tax cuts lowered taxes on savings and investment, making it easier for workers to save for the future and reducing the cost of investment. The consequences have been dramatic. Since June 2003, investment in the economy has surged by 28 percent in real terms and is higher now than during the late 1990s. The stock market has also recovered, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 2,500 points in since June of 2003. With tens of millions of American workers owning stocks through 401(k) plans, these gains have been broadly shared throughout the economy." You left out FY 2002, the year the tax cuts went into effect. 2011 !< 1894.

Lucylastic -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 3:58:19 PM)
I know you are trying to wriggle out of this but ..clearly it means you were the one that were receiving, SNORTS Id love to see the look on your face , I bet it was priceless. oh gawd here I go again, the look on your face as he dipps[sm=dancer.gif][sm=biggrin.gif] them between your lips, saying SUCK BITCH... SNORTS oh gawd I am gonna get a hernia if I think about that much longer[sm=fingers.gif][sm=insane.gif][sm=LMAO.gif][sm=lol.gif][sm=mademyday.gif][sm=owned.gif][sm=passthelube.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif]

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 4:11:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: joether Any economists worth his/her weight in gold has pointed the direct correlation between the Bush era tax cuts and the grow of the US Deficit. Bullshit. Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008. Weird how the numbers show it differently Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars) 1999 2106.11 2000 2284.56 2001 2196.46 2002 2011.72 2003 1894.06 2004 1942.84 2005 2153.61 2006 2330.94 2007 2420.48 2008 2326.63 2009 1917.81 funny but I always thought that 2420>2331>2154>1943>1894. "The economy's performance since the 2003 tax cuts went into effect has been stunning. The unemployment rate has fallen to from 6.3 percent to 4.7 percent-well below the historical average. Companies and entrepreneurs have created 5.7 million new jobs, including another 128,000 in August. And the typical unemployed worker now needs three fewer weeks to find a job than in June 2003. The 2003 tax cuts lowered taxes on savings and investment, making it easier for workers to save for the future and reducing the cost of investment. The consequences have been dramatic. Since June 2003, investment in the economy has surged by 28 percent in real terms and is higher now than during the late 1990s. The stock market has also recovered, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 2,500 points in since June of 2003. With tens of millions of American workers owning stocks through 401(k) plans, these gains have been broadly shared throughout the economy." You left out FY 2002, the year the tax cuts went into effect. 2011 !< 1894. 2002 is when the 2003 tax cuts went into effect? And fiscal policy does take time, yanno, its not instantaneous.

DomKen -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 7:51:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy 2002 is when the 2003 tax cuts went into effect? And fiscal policy does take time, yanno, its not instantaneous. The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002. Anyway your claims was quote: Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008. So FY 2002 is the baseline since it was his first budget. And FY 2003 revenue was lower than FY 2002. Which clearly makes your claim wrong.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 7:54:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Weird how the numbers show it differently Year Federal Tax Revenue in billions (2005 dollars) 1999 2106.11 2000 2284.56 2001 2196.46 2002 2011.72 2003 1894.06 2004 1942.84 2005 2153.61 2006 2330.94 2007 2420.48 2008 2326.63 2009 1917.81 funny but I always thought that 2420>2331>2154>1943>1894. "The economy's performance since the 2003 tax cuts went into effect has been stunning. The unemployment rate has fallen to from 6.3 percent to 4.7 percent-well below the historical average. Companies and entrepreneurs have created 5.7 million new jobs, including another 128,000 in August. And the typical unemployed worker now needs three fewer weeks to find a job than in June 2003. The 2003 tax cuts lowered taxes on savings and investment, making it easier for workers to save for the future and reducing the cost of investment. The consequences have been dramatic. Since June 2003, investment in the economy has surged by 28 percent in real terms and is higher now than during the late 1990s. The stock market has also recovered, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 2,500 points in since June of 2003. With tens of millions of American workers owning stocks through 401(k) plans, these gains have been broadly shared throughout the economy." You left out FY 2002, the year the tax cuts went into effect. 2011 !< 1894. 2002 is when the 2003 tax cuts went into effect? And fiscal policy does take time, yanno, its not instantaneous. The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002. Read my post and go away little girl.

DomKen -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 7:56:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002. Read my post and go away little girl. Once again, you claimed quote: Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008. Since Bush's first budget was FY 2002 that is the baseline and FY 2003 revenues were lower than FY 2002.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 7:59:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002. Read my post and go away little girl. Once again, you claimed quote: Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008. Since Bush's first budget was FY 2002 that is the baseline and FY 2003 revenues were lower than FY 2002. And once the Clinton recession's effects finally wore off and the 2001 AND 2003 tax cuts came into effect they did. What part of go away little girl didnt you understand? No one buys your semantic games anymore, dont you realize that?

DomKen -> RE: Obama Gets Teabagged (8/16/2011 8:00:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The first Bush tax cuts were passed in 2001 and went into efect in FY 2002. Read my post and go away little girl. Once again, you claimed quote: Revenues increased during the Bush administration until late 2008. Since Bush's first budget was FY 2002 that is the baseline and FY 2003 revenues were lower than FY 2002. And once the Clinton recession's effects finally wore off and the 2001 AND 2003 tax cuts came into effect they did. What part of go away little girl didnt you understand? No one buys your semantic games anymore, dont you realize that? You made a claim and you were wrong. What part of that isn't sinking into your tiny little brain?

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125