|
Termyn8or -> RE: How do I pay ? (8/15/2011 1:37:01 PM)
|
What is fair ? Not a buck apiece, that would be ridiculous becuae I got like 20GBs. Now really, there is a whole lot of stuff I will never listen to, it's just there because I decided to get a certain group or something, and it came along like the unnoticed Ambesol. Thinking off my ass, Chris Rock said something to the effect that guns are just fine, but bullets should be like five thousand dollars. Let's go with that. I would then pay, not to HAVE it, but to PLAY it. It's like cable TV in a way. You got the killer package, 912 channels. How many can you actually watch ? Someone said up in Canada some cable is actually pay for what you watch, and I know the technology exists, but this is the US and it would be cheaper so they won't do it here. I have been around the track with cable ompanies here over this shit. They fucking make you pay for commercials, which is one of the reasons I do not even have TV anymore. This thread is an outgrowth of me thinking too much. Like the other day - "I can't be doing that if I want bitching rights". I could concieve of doing away with the whole premise of paying for entertainment, but I know what would happen, there would be very little. Artists would have to have regular jobs and only do this part time. That ain't right. I mean for music it might work in a really killer kickass economy in which people can afford msucal instruments without mortgaging the place, shit like that, but that ain't how it is. I mean the cheapest steel sitdown guitars are like $300 and up, that's almost four tanks of gas for your car. The cheapest ass Washburn acoustic might be about $100, shit, that'll feed a family of four for a few days. And let's not even talk about other instruments like keyboards, saxes and shit, or mixing boards or the half a fucking kilowatt of sound reinforcement you need to even play with a set of drums in the room. Been there done that. There is serious mony involved, and that's if it's a hobby. But hold on. I remember radio. I literally do not own a radio. But I remember them, you turn them on and tune them in and they play music for free. All day long in every city. How do they pay ? They make me listen to some bitch selling me tampons or some other shit I simply don't need. Tell me how white my shirts can be, but he can't be a Man because he doesn't smoke the same cigarettes as me. So let's follow the money a bit more closely here. Forget recording off the radio, I was the KING of this. I would go bar hopping and have all my tape machines set up, when I was a kid "Ma, at midnight push this button". An unwitting accomplice to my crimes. But forget recording. It never happened, you saw NOTHING. So I have this cranking ass stereo in my 1970 Toronado, it can be heard for a LOOOOOONG way. I crank up the tunes. Oh yes I did. When I turned it down or changed the station when the commercials came on, was that stealing ? In my day, really if it was old nobody seemed to give a shit. The money was made on what is new. Unfortunately this led to contracts and formerly great artists making albums full of filler. I have already discussed why alot of bands' best albums were their first, because it took them all their life to make it. Afterward they are under contract. But then some other guy has a stereo in his car and is playing something good, and you never heard it. He says "Oh that's the new tune from Ishkabibble", and you go buy it. Then you have to record the thing on cassette or heaven forbid EIGHT TRACK so you can jam it in your car. That supported the industry. If I were any kind of decent musician I would be goddamn proud if people stole my work. But if I ain't got no electricity, there is no new record to play, how the fuck would I record it ? The courts think they settled this issue but they didn't. The DMCA is a nosebleed at best. The suits don't really know what to do, except to exercise the utmost greed, which is what they do best. But nobody has even addressed the question of right and wrong, and more and more in society the court does not care right from wrong. The law supposedly defines that. Well I am here to tellya that it does not. I don't know if it ever has. In fact I'm pretty sure it hasn't. T^T
|
|
|
|