Hillwilliam
Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy and theres no evidence for Murdoch being anything but a good businessman, and no evidence for trying to influence US elections. I don't recall Murdoch being accused of that or accused of having knowledge of it. And I still lmao at it being "bribery" when NOWT does it but "compensation for access" when ABC does it. Quite possibly your most ignorant post EVER. The entire raison d'etre of Fox news is to try to infuence US elections. If you dont understand that, I have bridge I'll sell ya. That is ALL they do. As for the bribery, show me where 'compensation for access' consists of buying confidential information from high ranking police officials. So far, it has cost 2 of said oficials their job and put the person that Murdoch considered his 'adoptive daughter' in fucking JAIL. If NOWT does it, that is wrong too but I have seen no evidence. I find it interesting that you take a page out of the liberal playbook (THEY did it first). Face it. Murdoch is a corrupt dirtbag. The only difference is that he is YOUR dirtbag so you have to defend him
_____________________________
Kinkier than a cheap garden hose. Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio. Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.
|