RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked.....

RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Hillwilliam -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 1:22:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania I find it funny that you hate Media Matters so much... I never found one accusation against them to hold water.... and being "liberal" doesn't make them wrong When they spin everything to meet George Soros' approval it does. And of course you never found one accusation against them to hold water, but youre "independent". LMAO. What's the difference between spinning to meet Soros's approval and spinning to meet Murdoch's approval? If you claim Soros is scum you must also accept the real possibility that Murdoch is too. At least I don't recall Soros's minions being accused of bribing high police officials and other felonies.

juliaoceania -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 1:43:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania I find it funny that you hate Media Matters so much... I never found one accusation against them to hold water.... and being "liberal" doesn't make them wrong When they spin everything to meet George Soros' approval it does. And of course you never found one accusation against them to hold water, but youre "independent". LMAO. Media Matters is independent, too, meaning nonpartisan... really, this isn't complex.. Next thing you will be telling me Amy Goodman is a democrat insider[8\|]

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 1:58:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania I find it funny that you hate Media Matters so much... I never found one accusation against them to hold water.... and being "liberal" doesn't make them wrong When they spin everything to meet George Soros' approval it does. And of course you never found one accusation against them to hold water, but youre "independent". LMAO. What's the difference between spinning to meet Soros's approval and spinning to meet Murdoch's approval? If you claim Soros is scum you must also accept the real possibility that Murdoch is too. At least I don't recall Soros's minions being accused of bribing high police officials and other felonies. The difference? One happens, the other doesnt. I have considered that possbility and theres no evidence for Murdoch being anything but a good businessman, and no evidence for trying to influence US elections. I don't recall Murdoch being accused of that or accused of having knowledge of it. And I still lmao at it being "bribery" when NOWT does it but "compensation for access" when ABC does it.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 2:02:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania Media Matters is independent, too, meaning nonpartisan... really, this isn't complex.. Thats ALMOST as funny as you claiming you are independent. David Brock, John Podesta, George Soros and Tom Mattzie are all independent too I guess.

Owner59 -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 5:34:33 PM)
If one`s claims are backed by fact,the record and independently verifiable,it doesn`t matter who the source is,even fox. That`s why when you cons are caught w/ your pants down it`s because ya`ll don`t have truth on your side. Hence the need for lying and making shit up,or suppressing stories,like we just saw fox do LIVE ON TAPE here.[:D]

juliaoceania -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 5:37:05 PM)
What really burns their asses is that Media Matters is a watchdog group, not a news outlet

Owner59 -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 5:45:51 PM)
They don`t have to make anything up,just role the tape. Brock used to be someone I loathed but his sincere recantation,rehabilitation and redemption have been heartwarming and welcome. It`s like having a high ranking officer from the apposing army on your side,working with you and helping you defeat the enemy. Only this time it`s rightist media.

tweakabelle -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 6:59:03 PM)
I don't know why the word 'Australian" appears in the OP. Murdoch is an American citizen. He lost his Australian nationality years ago, to no one's regret. He's one of you guys now. You are more than welcome to him.

juliaoceania -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 6:59:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle I don't know why the word 'Australian" appears in the OP. Murdoch is an American citizen. He lost his Australian nationality years ago, to no one's regret. He's one of you guys now. You are more than welcome to him. Does this mean we get to lock him up if he broke the law?[:D]

tweakabelle -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 7:04:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle I don't know why the word 'Australian" appears in the OP. Murdoch is an American citizen. He lost his Australian nationality years ago, to no one's regret. He's one of you guys now. You are more than welcome to him. Does this mean we get to lock him up if he broke the law?[:D] Please feel free. As far as I am concerned, I don't care whether it's the US or the UK or Inner Mongolia that gets to lock him up. As long as who ever gets the privilege of locking him up remembers to throw away the key as soon as they've done it.

Iamsemisweet -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 8:11:23 PM)
What, bet that Rupert threw Rebekah to the wolves? I would totally take that bet. The bigger question is whether she wises up to whether it is a good idea to fall on her sword for that old pirate.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 8:46:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy and theres no evidence for Murdoch being anything but a good businessman, and no evidence for trying to influence US elections. I don't recall Murdoch being accused of that or accused of having knowledge of it. And I still lmao at it being "bribery" when NOWT does it but "compensation for access" when ABC does it. Quite possibly your most ignorant post EVER. The entire raison d'etre of Fox news is to try to infuence US elections. If you dont understand that, I have bridge I'll sell ya. That is ALL they do. As for the bribery, show me where 'compensation for access' consists of buying confidential information from high ranking police officials. So far, it has cost 2 of said oficials their job and put the person that Murdoch considered his 'adoptive daughter' in fucking JAIL. If NOWT does it, that is wrong too but I have seen no evidence. I find it interesting that you take a page out of the liberal playbook (THEY did it first). Face it. Murdoch is a corrupt dirtbag. The only difference is that he is YOUR dirtbag so you have to defend him

Sanity -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 8:48:11 PM)
Whats REALLY funny is that she seems to believe it quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania Media Matters is independent, too, meaning nonpartisan... really, this isn't complex.. Thats ALMOST as funny as you claiming you are independent. David Brock, John Podesta, George Soros and Tom Mattzie are all independent too I guess.

Owner59 -> RE: Murdoch....Australian for fucked..... (7/18/2011 8:50:15 PM)
Reposted: If one`s claims are backed by fact,the record and independently verifiable,it doesn`t matter who the source is,even fox. "They don`t have to make anything up,just role the tape."

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.015625