|
joether -> RE: Herman Cain....One World Class Buffoon... (7/19/2011 7:21:47 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee Anyway, the banning of building a religious building would fall under the building permit laws and zoning laws. Which are local laws. I have a feeling that much like buying/selling a house or apartment, there are rules that say something to the effect of 'does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, or creed,' in it. Of course, trying to change the building permit and zoning laws to ban mosques would NEVER make it through the court system as acceptable. I would assume so. I got the impression from the Fox interview that his concern was with terrorism. Thats a legitimate concern as there are mosques associated with Wahhabism that seem to foster extremism, and if the founders of a prospective mosque have dubious connections then there would be a legitimate concern but objecting to a mosque simply for its religious association with Islam is going a bit far. If Mr. Cain was as serious as he claims on terrorism. Then explain why he isn't as strong attacking white, middle class, folks that once served in the US Military? Since that *IS* the discription that could be attached (among other things) to Mr. Timothy McVeigh. Last I checked, he was accused of of the Oklahoma City Bombing back on April 15, 1995 (and found....GUILTY). And you know why he doesnt do that? Because he would never get nominated for the GOP ticket. BTW, "...banning of building a religious building would fall under the building permit laws and zoning laws." ...has '1st Amendment challenge' written all over it. If this was true, religious warfare would be the norm in this country, not the extreme practice (as every group fights for every inch of property). Folks from one religion would lash out at a community that was opposed to them for nothing more than the religious viewpoint of the first group. After all, we allow Mormons and Scientologists to have churchs in this country. If what you say is true, than those two groups would NEVER be able to have the properties they have today (not to mention muslims, buddists, taoists, or any non-Christian religions/philosophies).
|
|
|
|