Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


imperatrixx -> Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/16/2011 10:20:34 AM)

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/309173

oh this is fucking lol.

"Citigroup, great bank. Bank of America, great bank. Are they getting the same kind of attention for hacking that took place less than a year ago that Newscorp is getting today?"

...

I don't even have words for this.




Lucylastic -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/16/2011 10:24:54 AM)

I do, Fucking Typical.
Isn this the same story where steve doocy says the NOTW and murdoch scandal is unimportant and people should move on???
Seems to me, the Whitehouse had its head screwed on not wanting to have anything to do with the organization at all.
I wouldnt trust them to run a fever without poisoning the patient




imperatrixx -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/16/2011 10:29:15 AM)

but...but...Murdoch apologized! Why are they still talking about it?




Lucylastic -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/16/2011 10:46:54 AM)

yeah I saw that, ..he was lying thru his teeth...hes been doing it for at least 8 decades,.




juliaoceania -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/16/2011 11:24:23 AM)

I gasped when I heard that this is how they were reporting this story... in other words they are pretend Fox was hackee instead of the hacker in this situation

They truly have no shame, same shit just a larger pile of it.




DomKen -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/16/2011 1:18:36 PM)

Of course this is how they're reporting the story. Thier audience doesn't get information from reality based sources so they will believe these lies and be real there was nothing confused or uninformed about that interview. When the inevitable US criminal charges against Murdoch and NC come down the right wingers will howl that it is a left wing witch hunt because they will think that what happened was minor and of no signifigance.




Termyn8or -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/16/2011 1:31:15 PM)

I looked in my wallet and the same amount of money is in there that was before. But then I didn't turn the TV on, where the fuck is that thing anyway ?

T^T




HannahLynHeather -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/16/2011 8:01:45 PM)

fox & friends is fucking stupid and so is anybody who takes it more seriously than barney & friends. i don't mean "needs help reading" stupid, i mean "needs to be reminded to breathe" stupid.




flcouple2009 -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/17/2011 10:24:37 AM)

Could you possibly find a bigger group of dunces hosting anything than the ones on "Fox and Friends"?




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/17/2011 10:49:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Of course this is how they're reporting the story. Thier audience doesn't get information from reality based sources so they will believe these lies and be real there was nothing confused or uninformed about that interview. When the inevitable US criminal charges against Murdoch and NC come down the right wingers will howl that it is a left wing witch hunt because they will think that what happened was minor and of no signifigance.


Given you're "spot on" take on Wiener, forgive us if we remember that your predictions are always full of shit.




DomKen -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/17/2011 11:50:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Of course this is how they're reporting the story. Thier audience doesn't get information from reality based sources so they will believe these lies and be real there was nothing confused or uninformed about that interview. When the inevitable US criminal charges against Murdoch and NC come down the right wingers will howl that it is a left wing witch hunt because they will think that what happened was minor and of no signifigance.


Given you're "spot on" take on Wiener, forgive us if we remember that your predictions are always full of shit.

Funny, did you read your post in the other thread on this? The one where you claimed this was blown out of proportion by Media Matters and took a swipe at George Soros?

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Or you could listen with half a brain and an unbiased ear and actually understand what they were saying. Since neither of you has either, just read your Media Matters, genuflect at the feet of George Soros, and wallow in the ignorance he needs to spread his gospel.


So you weren't claiming this is a left wing witch hunt? Your hypocrisy is showing.




juliaoceania -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/17/2011 12:07:46 PM)

quote:

Funny, did you read your post in the other thread on this? The one where you claimed this was blown out of proportion by Media Matters and took a swipe at George Soros?


Yeah, it is a left wing conspiracy[8|]




erieangel -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/17/2011 12:37:07 PM)

I wonder how Fox and Friends will spin Rebekah's arrest?


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/07/17/rebekah-brooks-arrested-i_n_900899.html?ncid=webmail3

It may take a few years, but I have a feeling Murdoch is going to lose his empire.







juliaoceania -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/17/2011 12:48:06 PM)

quote:

It may take a few years, but I have a feeling Murdoch is going to lose his empire.


He's 80 years old. He will be taking the long dirt nap sooner or later (and at his age I am thinking sooner rather than later). I do not see his empire outlasting him, the people he has groomed to take over do not have his flair for intimidation of journalists, bribery, or illegally obtaining information. He spent his years building his empire on bad will, and it is coming home to roost... he has made gobs of enemies that are lining up to roast marshmallows on the flames that remain after the implosion of News Corp




domiguy -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/17/2011 12:49:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Of course this is how they're reporting the story. Thier audience doesn't get information from reality based sources so they will believe these lies and be real there was nothing confused or uninformed about that interview. When the inevitable US criminal charges against Murdoch and NC come down the right wingers will howl that it is a left wing witch hunt because they will think that what happened was minor and of no signifigance.


Given you're "spot on" take on Wiener, forgive us if we remember that your predictions are always full of shit.


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Look into Adams' background and how he was hired. His testimony is worth precisely nothing.


What odds will you give me on Holder resigning/being forced out over this?

50k to 1


Wilbur, please once again inform us on what was going to happen to Holder? You owe me three hundred and DomKen $1,000.

Pay up. Asshole.




erieangel -> RE: Fox & Friends doesn't know the difference between hacking and getting hacked. (7/17/2011 12:54:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

It may take a few years, but I have a feeling Murdoch is going to lose his empire.


He's 80 years old. He will be taking the long dirt nap sooner or later (and at his age I am thinking sooner rather than later). I do not see his empire outlasting him, the people he has groomed to take over do not have his flair for intimidation of journalists, bribery, or illegally obtaining information. He spent his years building his empire on bad will, and it is coming home to roost... he has made gobs of enemies that are lining up to roast marshmallows on the flames that remain after the implosion of News Corp



Oh, I know he's 80s and you're right, Jr. will probably run the company into bankruptcy in short order. But News Corp will be nothing but a shell of its former self before Jr. gains control.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125