RE: Rigth wing payola

RE: Rigth wing payola (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Rigth wing payola (6/23/2011 8:48:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Why this crap about NPR? To demonstrate NPR (Left-leaning radio) also offers "sponsorship" packages (advertising), just as the networks that carry the shows the OP is all in a huff about do. ...no money goes directly to hosts. Still waiting for your PROOF that said money "goes to the host" of the Right-leaning shows you're griping about. Should we expect said PROOF anytime soon?!!

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Rigth wing payola (6/23/2011 8:51:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy anytime I pop in there they are fund raising or telling us about some sponsor- there are so many sponsor announcements that it may as well be talk radio. Public Television is the same... just the nature of the animal -- but both public TV and Radio have a devoted base. I personally LOVE some of the cooking shows -- and especially LOVE the rebroadcasts of the old Julia Childs shows. [:D]

pahunkboy -> RE: Rigth wing payola (6/23/2011 8:54:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy anytime I pop in there they are fund raising or telling us about some sponsor- there are so many sponsor announcements that it may as well be talk radio. Public Television is the same... just the nature of the animal -- but both public TV and Radio have a devoted base. I personally LOVE some of the cooking shows -- and especially LOVE the rebroadcasts of the old Julia Childs shows. [:D] Oh I am sure. I was in the 90s myself. These days I stick to music. I prefer a text copy of any news or info. I will watch some things on TV- mostly sit coms... tho even that can get stale.

DomKen -> RE: Rigth wing payola (6/23/2011 9:01:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The fact is thes organizations were never described as sponsors of the show Pssst... for the second time now... they don't have to be. Nobody said they had to be.. Actually, YOU did... but if you've backed off on that false premise, then you no longer have a basis for your position. Liar. I never once wrote that they had to do anything. I simply pointed out an unethical behavior that in slightly different circumstances is illegal.

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Rigth wing payola (6/23/2011 9:28:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The fact is thes organizations were never described as sponsors of the show Pssst... for the second time now... they don't have to be. Nobody said they had to be.. Actually, YOU did... but if you've backed off on that false premise, then you no longer have a basis for your position. Liar. I never once wrote that they had to do anything. I simply pointed out an unethical behavior that in slightly different circumstances is illegal. Liar... Your Post #9 to this thread... quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The fact is thes organizations were never described as sponsors of the show. OOOOOOH NOOOOOOOOZE... you DID!!! [:D] Oh, and I see you've STILL not provided any PROOF to support your falsely alluding that money is going "directly to hosts" of the Right-leaning shows -- which was your Post #18... just in case you need help finding this one too. Again, can we expect said proof anytime soon?!! [8\|]

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Rigth wing payola (6/23/2011 9:32:13 PM)
Not to mention the sleight of hand in "unethical", when it is no such thing, followed by "under different circumstances would be illegal". I think the shark bit a hole in his ass when he jumped it with his Weiner stupidity.

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Rigth wing payola (6/23/2011 9:43:36 PM)
[:D] hee hee

DomKen -> RE: Rigth wing payola (6/24/2011 2:35:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The fact is thes organizations were never described as sponsors of the show Pssst... for the second time now... they don't have to be. Nobody said they had to be.. Actually, YOU did... but if you've backed off on that false premise, then you no longer have a basis for your position. Liar. I never once wrote that they had to do anything. I simply pointed out an unethical behavior that in slightly different circumstances is illegal. Liar... Your Post #9 to this thread... quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The fact is thes organizations were never described as sponsors of the show. OOOOOOH NOOOOOOOOZE... you DID!!! [:D] Oh, and I see you've STILL not provided any PROOF to support your falsely alluding that money is going "directly to hosts" of the Right-leaning shows -- which was your Post #18... just in case you need help finding this one too. Again, can we expect said proof anytime soon?!! [8\|] Who taught you to read? I didn't say the organizations had to be named as sponsors. Quoting and underlinging something I wrote that doesn't support your claim doesn't change a thing.

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Rigth wing payola (6/24/2011 2:57:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen So NO PROOF... thanks for playing. You lose. [:D]

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.015625