Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 6:18:31 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

fast reply

I suppose I see this as somewhat ironic, the man that has exploited so many women is in his old age the one that is vulnerable to exploitation. He is 85! Who knows how mentally competent he is to even handle his own affairs these days



Maybe he has an entourage, an agent, a publicist and so forth.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 6:22:18 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

fast reply

I suppose I see this as somewhat ironic, the man that has exploited so many women is in his old age the one that is vulnerable to exploitation. He is 85! Who knows how mentally competent he is to even handle his own affairs these days



Maybe he has an entourage, an agent, a publicist and so forth.



I do not know if those people are the appropriate people to negotiate a marriage for him.




_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 6:29:44 PM   
FullCircle


Posts: 5713
Joined: 11/24/2005
Status: offline
If she wanted to exploit the guy then surely a divorce works better after a marriage?

Maybe they wanted her to sign a bit of paper saying she couldn't have half his assets. She also could have played the long game i.e. wait five minutes for him to die of old age and then play the distraught widow.

She had options now she just has the taste of Polygrip stuck in her mouth.


< Message edited by FullCircle -- 6/16/2011 6:30:08 PM >


_____________________________

ﮒuקּƹɼ ƾɛϰưϫԼ Ƨωιϯϲћ.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 6:33:00 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

fast reply

I suppose I see this as somewhat ironic, the man that has exploited so many women is in his old age the one that is vulnerable to exploitation. He is 85! Who knows how mentally competent he is to even handle his own affairs these days



Maybe he has an entourage, an agent, a publicist and so forth.



I do not know if those people are the appropriate people to negotiate a marriage for him.





They likely would negotiate the prenup.    I assume there is/was one.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 6:33:35 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
maybe he had to give up on the viagra

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to FullCircle)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 6:59:05 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

If she wanted to exploit the guy then surely a divorce works better after a marriage?

Maybe they wanted her to sign a bit of paper saying she couldn't have half his assets. She also could have played the long game i.e. wait five minutes for him to die of old age and then play the distraught widow.

She had options now she just has the taste of Polygrip stuck in her mouth.



Maybe her reluctance to tie the knot is because his lawyers control it now...lol

It probably fell through when she realized she wasn't getting anything if (when) it failed.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to FullCircle)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 7:14:24 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
^   LMAO.     +1

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 7:27:26 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

fast reply

I suppose I see this as somewhat ironic, the man that has exploited so many women is in his old age the one that is vulnerable to exploitation. He is 85! Who knows how mentally competent he is to even handle his own affairs these days


Hugh Hefner is a well known long time feminist.  Those girls wanted to pose in his magazine.  Given that FACT, he isn't exploiting them.  There was a market for a product and he provided it.  He isn't Bob Guccione with Penthouse or Larry Flynt with Hustler.  His magazine doesn't present women in the same way they do.  And again, these women WANT to be in the magazine so they aren't being exploited. 

You can't even say he exploited his previous girlfriends either.  When they decided it was time to end, he wished them well and is still in contact with them.  His three previous girlfriends were able to use their relationship with Hef to launch their own careers and provide for their own self sufficiency.  Whether you agree with how they did that or not still does not equate to exploitation.  Considering every woman who has ever been involved with him continues to have glowing things to say about him and they have remained friends, that says more about him than anything you are.

Obviously, you have a HUGE problem with him.  You go on to "wonder" how competant an 85 year old man can be?  Are you serious?  For someone who is supposedly an anthropoligist, I would expect you to know a great deal more about the current state of our senior citizens.

Hugh Hefner still has the final say on his magazine, although his DAUGHTER is now the head of the company.  If you had ever seen him in an interview, you wouldn't stop to question his competency.  He also managed to provide an example of how happy poly relationships exist.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 7:35:16 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

Hugh Hefner is a well known long time feminist.  Those girls wanted to pose in his magazine.  Given that FACT, he isn't exploiting them.  There was a market for a product and he provided it.  He isn't Bob Guccione with Penthouse or Larry Flynt with Hustler.  His magazine doesn't present women in the same way they do.  And again, these women WANT to be in the magazine so they aren't being exploited. 


This depends on how one wants to define "exploit"

quote:

ex·ploit2    
[ik-sploit] Show IPA
–verb (used with object)
1.
to utilize, especially for profit; turn to practical account: to exploit a business opportunity.
2.
to use selfishly for one's own ends: employers who exploit their workers.
3.
to advance or further through exploitation; promote: He exploited his new movie through a series of guest appearances.


Now I would never wanna dog on Hef. In my eyes he at least used women in the first category of "exploit", and he did a little of the second part of that definition, too.

I am not really into fighting about this man. He is a senior citizen, he isn't evil or anything. And I do not believe he I have demonized him on this thread. If you wanna create drama tonight, do it on someone else's time.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 7:42:39 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

Hugh Hefner is a well known long time feminist.  Those girls wanted to pose in his magazine.  Given that FACT, he isn't exploiting them.  There was a market for a product and he provided it.  He isn't Bob Guccione with Penthouse or Larry Flynt with Hustler.  His magazine doesn't present women in the same way they do.  And again, these women WANT to be in the magazine so they aren't being exploited. 


This depends on how one wants to define "exploit"

quote:

ex·ploit2    
[ik-sploit] Show IPA
–verb (used with object)
1.
to utilize, especially for profit; turn to practical account: to exploit a business opportunity.
2.
to use selfishly for one's own ends: employers who exploit their workers.
3.
to advance or further through exploitation; promote: He exploited his new movie through a series of guest appearances.


Now I would never wanna dog on Hef. In my eyes he at least used women in the first category of "exploit", and he did a little of the second part of that definition, too.

I am not really into fighting about this man. He is a senior citizen, he isn't evil or anything. And I do not believe he I have demonized him on this thread. If you wanna create drama tonight, do it on someone else's time.


Look, by those definitions everyone in business exploits everyone else.  The problem with your definitions is that it leaves out that these women were paid quite well for their pictures.  I would agree they were exploited if they were paid $500 to him making 5 million, but it isn't like that.

By your definition, every stripper, escort and employee of the bunny ranch in Vegas is being exploited, because the stripper may have to pay something to the venue, the escort to the agency who employs her gets their cut and the girls at the bunny ranch pay rent for the space.

I'm not trying to create "drama."  That's your way of trying to back off making an ignorant comment looking for an unfound laugh.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 7:49:19 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

Look, by those definitions everyone in business exploits everyone else. 


I would agree, but we are talking about a man that made his money in a specific way... geesh... I am not some bra burning feminist that wants to hang him up and use him as a pinata

quote:

The problem with your definitions is that it leaves out that these women were paid quite well for their pictures. I would agree they were exploited if they were paid $500 to him making 5 million, but it isn't like that.


He still made more money than they did by far... hey, I am not saying that this is bad. It is what it is.

quote:

By your definition, every stripper, escort and employee of the bunny ranch in Vegas is being exploited, because the stripper may have to pay something to the venue, the escort to the agency who employs her gets their cut and the girls at the bunny ranch pay rent for the space.


I think people exploit each other for different reasons all of the time... again, your point?

Like I said, I do not think that Old Hef is a terrible person. I do not think Larry Flynt is, either, when we get right down to it.


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 7:53:32 PM   
pissdoll


Posts: 343
Joined: 5/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I suppose I see this as somewhat ironic, the man that has exploited so many women is in his old age the one that is vulnerable to exploitation.



quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

  He also managed to provide an example of how happy poly relationships exist.



yeah, i disagree that he has ever exploited anyone. if women choose to exploit their own bodies for profit, then really...that's what feminism is all about.

but seriously...happy poly relationships? do you honestly think his relationship with those girls all in his house was *real*? it was a tv show that made money and sold magazines and dvds as tie-ins. and his reputation with past "poly" relationships...all served as publicity.

twenty year old hot women don't want to hang out with an 80 year old man. they want the fame and money he can provide to them and he wants the reputation of being a ladies man.

my thoughts tend toward the opinion that the "runaway bride" was a publicity stunt in itself...that they were never going to actually get married. but then again, i'm a suspicious girl by nature.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/16/2011 7:56:20 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
The guy is a pimp.  Of course he exploits the girls- who let them self be exploited.




(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/17/2011 10:45:38 AM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pissdoll

but seriously...happy poly relationships? do you honestly think his relationship with those girls all in his house was *real*? it was a tv show that made money and sold magazines and dvds as tie-ins. and his reputation with past "poly" relationships...all served as publicity.



Actually, those relationships were in place for a while prior to the show.  He has always portrayed himself as a "ladies" man, right from the early years.  He has always been very up front with the women that he was dating that there would be others, and has in the past had similar multiple relationships where the girls all lived together.  Prior to this one, was the successful television trio, but prior to that there was another group not used as publicity all.  So it isn't all about money.

I often wonder what these young, beautiful women find about him other than his money, and whether that had serious "daddy" issues they were working through.  But I never wondered too hard.  As for the product marketing, people (likely men, although I think more women watched the show), Hef has a knack for seeing what his "niche" area is looking to see.  People wanted to see how he and the ladies actually lived, so he agreed to the show.  He encouraged  Bridgette to finish her college education, he helped Kendra to grow up and she talks about him as someone she is grateful to for all he did for her.  Holly, I feel so sorry for her.  She loved him and wanted the ring.  She finally gave up, and quickly after, he gives it to someone else.  She still cares for the guy, and feels badly for him.

As for the poly statement.....we often talk around here how poly can be successful and happy, right?  First, everyone must be up front and honest about what they expect.  Yep, they did that.  Second, all the people involved need to be ok with the situation.  Seems everyone was.  Now granted, any middle aged guy who wants the same type of situation will hear the "who do you think you are, Hugh Hefner?" comments but still, it remains that he had a poly household and offered everyone a glimpse into it from a different perspective than Big Love.

quote:



twenty year old hot women don't want to hang out with an 80 year old man. they want the fame and money he can provide to them and he wants the reputation of being a ladies man.

my thoughts tend toward the opinion that the "runaway bride" was a publicity stunt in itself...that they were never going to actually get married. but then again, i'm a suspicious girl by nature.


He isn't just any 80 year old man.  He isn't the first wealthy 80 year old man to go for the twentysomething either (Anna Nicole Smith anyone?).  If they want fame and money he provides and he wants it to maintain his reputation, it seems like a win win situation, doesn't it?

I tend to think that perhaps the wedding was a publicity stunt on the part of the female here.  I think she was looking for a way to rocket her star a little quicker.  I haven't heard her "single" so I don't know if she has a shot in hell, but I don't think it was as much of a stunt on Hef's part.  I think he is now trying to make lemonade out the of the lemons she left.

I have never, ever read anything derogatory about him as a man.  His employees stay with him for years, his ex girlfriends all remain friendly and close with him.  Over the 50-60 years this man has been in the public eye, that is saying something.

In any case, the guy was planning on getting married, and at the last minute, the engagement was off.  His age, his business, none of that matters.  Had someone around here posted something similar happening to him, he would get a lot of "Sorry to hear it, dude.  But better now than after.  Take some time and you will find the right one for you in the future."  The instant "this is what happens when you exploit women over years and years.  Karma, blah blah blah, sounds bitter, an attempt to point out one's own agenda.  Adding insult to injury by wondering how "competant" one can be at 85 shows ignorance of the current lifestyles of senior citizens.  When someone does that, what I see is a person who is normally trying to present themselves as very liberal and contemplative, letting their true bias about certain issues show through. 

And the further comments are just humorous to me because in order to respond, someone can't sneak behind their liberal flag and act like they don't have the bias.  In the future, it I will question the credibility of anything stated wondering whether that's the persona wanted to be presented, or the actual truth.  Honestly, I've always wondered it, but now it will be more obvious.

(in reply to pissdoll)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/17/2011 10:51:56 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Money can't buy you love but it can buy you shit that looks so close to it you aint even gonna question it.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/17/2011 10:54:26 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Money can't buy you love but it can buy you shit that looks so close to it you aint even gonna question it.



This....lol

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/17/2011 12:41:07 PM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pissdoll

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I suppose I see this as somewhat ironic, the man that has exploited so many women is in his old age the one that is vulnerable to exploitation.



quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

  He also managed to provide an example of how happy poly relationships exist.



yeah, i disagree that he has ever exploited anyone. if women choose to exploit their own bodies for profit, then really...that's what feminism is all about.

but seriously...happy poly relationships? do you honestly think his relationship with those girls all in his house was *real*? it was a tv show that made money and sold magazines and dvds as tie-ins. and his reputation with past "poly" relationships...all served as publicity.

twenty year old hot women don't want to hang out with an 80 year old man. they want the fame and money he can provide to them and he wants the reputation of being a ladies man.

my thoughts tend toward the opinion that the "runaway bride" was a publicity stunt in itself...that they were never going to actually get married. but then again, i'm a suspicious girl by nature.


Oh give me a break when it comes to the "exploitation" of women in Playboy, you do know how much they pay? When I was 19 I stripped off for them and it enabled me to pursue a PhD, I still had to work but the money I got from this 3 day shot was enough to see me through most of my studies and I could study in various different countries (with grants from the universities) and it made me life a lot easier to have a bit of a financial padding when it came to buying books versus trying to get them from the library where they never had enough. The only backlash that ever occurred was that I found out that my dad was a subscriber (and he was not best pleased) and years later when I wrote and edited for the magazine and mentioned it to a bunch of colleagues over a boozy lunch that it's funny 10 years ago... and now writing for them. Next thing I know is the janitor telling me that my colleagues are all going through the old editions in the archive... Duh, well...

I can tell you that I felt much much more exploited in the minimum wage waitress jobs I also had as a student, where I had to smile and be nice to leering old men to get tipped than the photo shoot in a very professional atmosphere where the photographer, lighting guys and makeup person were friendly, professional and rather nice. Did I feel exploited by taking my clothes off? Fuck no, I'm European and I'm used to clothing optional beaches, I got paid for showing what I was showing for free when I was going swimming or sun bathing. Playboy has no "spread your legs" shots that display the tonsils from the wrong side up, I wouldn't call the pictures art and I was fully aware that a bunch of guys would make the pages stick together, big fucking deal, they're not getting spunk on me, I mean should I be paranoid that a guy sees me in a bar, finds me sexually attractive and will go home and has a wank while thinking of me? No way, too busy having a sex life myself, it's not like they are actually touching me.

So this whole bloody claptrap about how women get exploited by Playboy because they let themselves be exploited, how about you safe that for women who are really exploited? You know in minimum wage jobs and stuff...

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to pissdoll)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/17/2011 12:44:43 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: pissdoll

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I suppose I see this as somewhat ironic, the man that has exploited so many women is in his old age the one that is vulnerable to exploitation.



quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

He also managed to provide an example of how happy poly relationships exist.



yeah, i disagree that he has ever exploited anyone. if women choose to exploit their own bodies for profit, then really...that's what feminism is all about.

but seriously...happy poly relationships? do you honestly think his relationship with those girls all in his house was *real*? it was a tv show that made money and sold magazines and dvds as tie-ins. and his reputation with past "poly" relationships...all served as publicity.

twenty year old hot women don't want to hang out with an 80 year old man. they want the fame and money he can provide to them and he wants the reputation of being a ladies man.

my thoughts tend toward the opinion that the "runaway bride" was a publicity stunt in itself...that they were never going to actually get married. but then again, i'm a suspicious girl by nature.


Oh give me a break when it comes to the "exploitation" of women in Playboy, you do know how much they pay? When I was 19 I stripped off for them and it enabled me to pursue a PhD, I still had to work but the money I got from this 3 day shot was enough to see me through most of my studies and I could study in various different countries (with grants from the universities) and it made me life a lot easier to have a bit of a financial padding when it came to buying books versus trying to get them from the library where they never had enough. The only backlash that ever occurred was that I found out that my dad was a subscriber (and he was not best pleased) and years later when I wrote and edited for the magazine and mentioned it to a bunch of colleagues over a boozy lunch that it's funny 10 years ago... and now writing for them. Next thing I know is the janitor telling me that my colleagues are all going through the old editions in the archive... Duh, well...

I can tell you that I felt much much more exploited in the minimum wage waitress jobs I also had as a student, where I had to smile and be nice to leering old men to get tipped than the photo shoot in a very professional atmosphere where the photographer, lighting guys and makeup person were friendly, professional and rather nice. Did I feel exploited by taking my clothes off? Fuck no, I'm European and I'm used to clothing optional beaches, I got paid for showing what I was showing for free when I was going swimming or sun bathing. Playboy has no "spread your legs" shots that display the tonsils from the wrong side up, I wouldn't call the pictures art and I was fully aware that a bunch of guys would make the pages stick together, big fucking deal, they're not getting spunk on me, I mean should I be paranoid that a guy sees me in a bar, finds me sexually attractive and will go home and has a wank while thinking of me? No way, too busy having a sex life myself, it's not like they are actually touching me.

So this whole bloody claptrap about how women get exploited by Playboy because they let themselves be exploited, how about you safe that for women who are really exploited? You know in minimum wage jobs and stuff...


What issue was it again?


I'm REALLY surprised I beat mnot to that comment LOL

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/17/2011 12:53:52 PM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
You mean you don't want to leer at the pics, you just want to know how I looked almost 2 decades ago? Tell you what, even without thinking about the flattering angles and the airbrushing they did (I have to remind myself of that to keep depression at bay, oh and the freaking wonders they did with clear 2 sided tape, fucking amazing) it's depressing, I take good care of my body as it's the only one I got and spare parts are hard to come by, but yeah, not possible to stop time and despite my best efforts at the gym, my tits simply don't proudly defy gravity anymore, I have to <sob sob> wear a bra and what came effortlessly now requires maintenance, i.e. going to the gym.

Still, I didn't feel exploited for a moment, working in bars and restaurants where the patrons thought they could make comments and brush your ass casually - that felt a lot more like exploitation!

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar - 6/17/2011 1:00:57 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze

You mean you don't want to leer at the pics, you just want to know how I looked almost 2 decades ago? Tell you what, even without thinking about the flattering angles and the airbrushing they did (I have to remind myself of that to keep depression at bay, oh and the freaking wonders they did with clear 2 sided tape, fucking amazing) it's depressing, I take good care of my body as it's the only one I got and spare parts are hard to come by, but yeah, not possible to stop time and despite my best efforts at the gym, my tits simply don't proudly defy gravity anymore, I have to <sob sob> wear a bra and what came effortlessly now requires maintenance, i.e. going to the gym.

Still, I didn't feel exploited for a moment, working in bars and restaurants where the patrons thought they could make comments and brush your ass casually - that felt a lot more like exploitation!


Purely biohistorical research.  I am trained as a biologist ya know.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Playboy founder Hugh Hefner dumped at the altar Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.250