RE: just a question (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


MasterSlaveLA -> RE: just a question (6/14/2011 7:12:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

It depends on how the person is using the term.

A switch can be a person who can enjoy either the D or s position in a dynamic.

A switch can also be a person who enjoys being either the top or bottom during play.



It's also worth noting that for some, they only "switch" with certain genders (i.e., one may enjoy submitting to men, but dominating women), and for others, it doesn't matter. [:)]





sexisubi -> RE: just a question (6/14/2011 9:12:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexisubi

people who do the switcheroo, they can be either dominate or submissive during play depending on their mood and their compromising skills.


Say what?  That little faux paus up there notwithstanding, what the heck are "compromising skills"?



the other side to my response was more about me!

for me sometimes i wanna do things and sometimes i dont. sometimes i compromise with who im with (which is just my x), and sometimes i feel like i shouldnt have to!

so i was more talking about me... which, can be another persons feelings... im just throwing out options, different perspectives that havent been said. maybe funny to some, maybe helpful to others.

**edit.. sometimes i compromise for someone i truly care for.. so maybe im not in the mood to be Dom but i love them enough to do it anyway... or i dont want to be submissive.. but i do it anyway.

i hope that clears up the controversy!! sometimes when i care, i compromise--- a lot. however, they compromise too.




sunshinemiss -> RE: just a question (6/15/2011 2:40:37 AM)

Thank you, I.  Your explanation is greatly appreciated.  I really had no idea what you were talking about.  I think that EVERY relationship requires compromise - if it's healthy anyway.  Craptastic relationships don't require it so much. 

As for the "controversy"... The term "switch" is like many terms.  People can argue ad nauseum but still it always rolls back to ... "this is MY definition, and it works for me."

best,
sunshine





ranja -> RE: just a question (6/15/2011 2:51:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker

It's another way to say "indecisive."


i suppose i am indecisive and greedy that way.

i can not make my mind up about much at all, eventually i switched-on (look i did a pun) to the fact that my Husband is dominant and so i have to submit to get Him interested.... but me, i think really i am just greedy at heart like needles.

hence: yes there is compromising to do for me, great pay off though




sexisubi -> RE: just a question (6/15/2011 9:29:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

Thank you, I.  Your explanation is greatly appreciated.  I really had no idea what you were talking about.  I think that EVERY relationship requires compromise - if it's healthy anyway.  Craptastic relationships don't require it so much. 

As for the "controversy"... The term "switch" is like many terms.  People can argue ad nauseum but still it always rolls back to ... "this is MY definition, and it works for me."

best,
sunshine




thanks =) since i got back i remember all the "my way only way" things i used to see on the boards... not that im on here too much =) i just come by to get outta my head for a bit and talk to fine people like you!




HannahLynHeather -> RE: just a question (6/15/2011 4:37:36 PM)

quote:

A switch can be a person who can enjoy either the D or s position in a dynamic.

A switch can also be a person who enjoys being either the top or bottom during play.
or both, or all of them together.....
i'm submissive towards dominant women

i'm dominant towards submissive women

i cannot switch my dominant/submissive status, that is determined by the woman in question, my orientation is a response to theirs.

i can be either top or bottom with either of the above types, there is no correlation between dominance/submissiveness and top/bottom for me.

i can top or bottom with men

i am neither dominant nor submissive with men, though i can play either role with a man, but its just that, a fucking role i am playing.

quote:

It's another way to say "indecisive."
this is a common misconception usually held by people with limited fucking mental capacity, often overly behindular in their general world views. one can usually recognize these wormy little fucks as they tend to be overly effeminate men with long hair and pale hairless bodies, reminiscent of a dead fish, they worry more about their looks and that they are wearing the latest trendiest fashions than a 10th grade schoolgirl (though the school girl is usually much further along on the maturity scale). when you come across one of these fuckers, don't be frightened, they are harmless as they are generally too socially inept to actually engage a woman in conversation beyond a few pathetic attempts at witticisms. if one does persist in bothering you, just throw a spider at him. these sad little sissy boys are all so fucking afraid of spiders that they fucking piss themselves (and ruin their expensive clothes - an added bonus).

hannah lynn




gungadin09 -> RE: just a question (6/15/2011 4:51:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker
I provided a very honest answer and should be thanked.


Thank You, my Lord. i would have spoken up earlier, but i felt too unworthy.

[image]http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-basic/worthy.gif[/image]

pam




gungadin09 -> RE: just a question (6/15/2011 10:22:53 PM)

That was a joke, by the way.

pam




Kana -> RE: just a question (6/16/2011 5:42:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddysredhead

To "aroman" -

I, for one, do not compromise with my Sir. He is always in the Dominant role, and I am always submissive to him. Unless two switches are in a relationship with each other, there is no 'art of compromise' needed. It is the same with my relationship with my sub. He is never in the lead, I am. His role is as well-defined as mine is to my Sir.

~ Red

*edited bc typing on a phone is hell when trying to remember who I'm writing to & their screen names*


What's that old line..."She's not bi, she's just greedy."
That may apply here :-)




LillyBoPeep -> RE: just a question (6/16/2011 7:35:10 AM)

this is probably going to sound really bad, but i kinda gave up on talking to switch men for a while, because they were primarily sub, who wanted to assure me that they "could be very Dom," but spent most of their trying to convince me that they were positive i had a dominant side.
i really don't. =p

i don't think all switches switch w/in one relationship, but some do, like DRH said, if there are two switches involved. i don't think you HAVE to always be wary that your switchy sub will try to pull rank on you or something, though in my VERY limited experience with getting to know a particular kind of switch male, i'd be worried that he's 1) not being himself with me, or 2) just doing something so that later he can say "well i did it for you, you HAVE to do it for me!"

most of the "genuine" switches i know do say that their tendency to switch is determined by the orientation of the person they're involved with. if they get into a relationship with a Dominant and feel the desire to be submissive to that person, they aren't likely to turn around one day and say "okay, now you're on the bottom!" likewise/visa versa with people they feel dominant towards.

personally i don't have a problem with people who are switchy. i'm just somewhat wary of switch men until i learn that their motivations aren't "sub in disguise."




ranja -> RE: just a question (6/16/2011 7:46:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

quote:

A switch can be a person who can enjoy either the D or s position in a dynamic.

A switch can also be a person who enjoys being either the top or bottom during play.
or both, or all of them together.....
i'm submissive towards dominant women

i'm dominant towards submissive women

i cannot switch my dominant/submissive status, that is determined by the woman in question, my orientation is a response to theirs.

i can be either top or bottom with either of the above types, there is no correlation between dominance/submissiveness and top/bottom for me.

i can top or bottom with men

i am neither dominant nor submissive with men, though i can play either role with a man, but its just that, a fucking role i am playing.

quote:

It's another way to say "indecisive."
this is a common misconception usually held by people with limited fucking mental capacity, often overly behindular in their general world views. one can usually recognize these wormy little fucks as they tend to be overly effeminate men with long hair and pale hairless bodies, reminiscent of a dead fish, they worry more about their looks and that they are wearing the latest trendiest fashions than a 10th grade schoolgirl (though the school girl is usually much further along on the maturity scale). when you come across one of these fuckers, don't be frightened, they are harmless as they are generally too socially inept to actually engage a woman in conversation beyond a few pathetic attempts at witticisms. if one does persist in bothering you, just throw a spider at him. these sad little sissy boys are all so fucking afraid of spiders that they fucking piss themselves (and ruin their expensive clothes - an added bonus).

hannah lynn



miscon-fucking-ception Hanna? it seems that N-fucking-S was spot on with his state-fucking-ment about inde-fucking-cision

'cos it seems to me as i read your post that you are indecisive and let the other woman determine if you're gonna be sub or dom... or am i reading it wrong?

and when it comes to men you play act, either this or that... i suppose also according to what the fucker of a man wants? where is the de-fucking-cisiveness in that?

it seems to me more a 'go with the fucking flow' thing




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.198242E-02