RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels.

RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:19:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Willbe, how about providing sources to back up your claims that Obama is supporting rapists? That is not what I said, no matter how much you would like it to be. So why not answer Moon`s direct question ? You were certainly infering President Obama supported rapists, by calling them his buddies. You wouldnt know an honest claim if it bit you on the arse. I was implying nothing of the kind. English is a wonderful language when its read literally. And Moon is on ignore, so I have no idea nor could I care less what his question is.

Politesub53 -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:20:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg No PS, it is about atrocities in Islamic countries. I do see why you would rather not explore the issue Sanity is raising. Why is the killing of over 700 Civilians and the Maiming of another 4000 worthwhile? Over the objections of the Arab Leauge, and the OAS. I find it hard to even try and stoop to your level. You are switching topic as per usual. Add to that the fact you are a halfwit, it becomes easy to see why I am so exasperated with you.

Politesub53 -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:23:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 So why not answer Moon`s direct question ? You were certainly infering President Obama supported rapists, by calling them his buddies. You wouldnt know an honest claim if it bit you on the arse. I was inferring nothing of the kind. And I Moon is on ignore, so I have no idea nor could I care less what his question is. Your claim that you are not infering that which you are infering is amusing, to say the least. Next you will be telling me you are not right wing. Some of us see through your nonsense all too easily though.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:25:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 So why not answer Moon`s direct question ? You were certainly infering President Obama supported rapists, by calling them his buddies. You wouldnt know an honest claim if it bit you on the arse. I was inferring nothing of the kind. And I Moon is on ignore, so I have no idea nor could I care less what his question is. Your claim that you are not infering that which you are infering is amusing, to say the least. Next you will be telling me you are not right wing. Some of us see through your nonsense all too easily though. So now youre a fucking mindreader too? Read my lips: I WAS IMPLYING NOTHING. MY WORDS ARE VERY LITERAL, NOTHING BETWEEN THE LINES, NOTHING TO INFER. And learn the difference between infer and imply.

Politesub53 -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:35:18 PM)
Not a mind reader Wilbur, just pointing out your B/s, literal or otherwise.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:37:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Not a mind reader Wilbur, just pointing out your B/s, literal or otherwise. Whatever, Pettysub. Talk in circles as much as you want. I'll be happy to tutor you in reading comprehension, PM me. I take paypal.

luckydawg -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:38:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg No PS, it is about atrocities in Islamic countries. I do see why you would rather not explore the issue Sanity is raising. Why is the killing of over 700 Civilians and the Maiming of another 4000 worthwhile? Over the objections of the Arab Leauge, and the OAS. I find it hard to even try and stoop to your level. You are switching topic as per usual. Add to that the fact you are a halfwit, it becomes easy to see why I am so exasperated with you. Yes, you can't respond to the facts I brought to the debate. So you resort to insults. very common for your side. Why is the killing of over 700 civilians and maiming over 4000 good policy?

SilverMark -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:48:07 PM)
I am sure no one would support what happened in Saddam's Iraq, but the closed nature of the regime and his antipathy towards the West who was truly aware of them? We do not have ground troops in Lybia, it is truly a civil war, with NATO flying support missions, so there is a difference between the situations. I only wish all we had to do in Iraq was to support an insurrection. Wil, where is your proof of Obama being tied to any form of systematic rape? Another inflammatory statement with nothing to it?

luckydawg -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:56:38 PM)
everyone who was interested was very aware of it. I guess it depends on how you define "troops", we have people on the ground. The mission statemen is garbled and creeping. We are not just defending the rebels, but making War on the government. Not a No fly zone, but an assualt on CCC centers, with civilian causualties. Why is it worth it to take sides in this civil war? Why?

jlf1961 -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 5:59:42 PM)
Wilbe wants us to believe Arab Spring is a group, by his inference. However, Arab Spring is a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests that has been taking place in the Arab world since 18 December 2010. He also infers by his statement that the entire group of people involved in these revolutions are committing systematic rape. Wilbe is a typical conservative with his broad general statements about these groups of revolutionaries. Funny when you consider that most, if not all, of these movements are pro democracy.

Politesub53 -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 6:00:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Yes, you can't respond to the facts I brought to the debate. So you resort to insults. very common for your side. Why is the killing of over 700 civilians and maiming over 4000 good policy? Putting words in my mouth doesnt negate your stupidity. Get back on track and we can debate some more. Wilbur, Mark beat me to it. I will read your answer with interest. As for you tutoring me, dream on.

luckydawg -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 6:06:17 PM)
I put no words in your mouth, what a ridiculous and trollish thing to say. I pointed out you responded to facts that I consider pertininent, with personal attacks. You didn't refute the factualness or argue for thier irrelevancy. You insulted me. I kind of doubt you know what debate actually is.

jlf1961 -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 6:38:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg everyone who was interested was very aware of it. I guess it depends on how you define "troops", we have people on the ground. The mission statemen is garbled and creeping. We are not just defending the rebels, but making War on the government. Not a No fly zone, but an assualt on CCC centers, with civilian causualties. Why is it worth it to take sides in this civil war? Why? You mind providing links that prove that Americans are on the ground in Libya and helping the rebels?

Sanity -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 6:47:19 PM)
Is that anger, "Politesub"? [:D] Careful now, youre proving Ann Coulter correct! quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 I find it hard to even try and stoop to your level. You are switching topic as per usual. Add to that the fact you are a halfwit, it becomes easy to see why I am so exasperated with you.

Sanity -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 6:59:50 PM)
The fact that there were unspeakable crimes against humanity occurring every day in pre-liberation Iraq was very well known to most anyone curious enough to have spent ten minutes online Googling the facts. Many people were screaming that Saddam was the worst kind of tyrant from the mountain tops, myself included. The horrors of prewar Iraq can only news to you because most of the mainstream media chose to ignore the atrocities in Saddams Iraq for political reasons. That the same left leaning media gladly publishes any atrocities it can uncover in Syria now is more a testament to the malfeasance of todays media elite than it is any kind of an accurate representation of the reality on the ground, wherever theyre reporting from (or failing to report from). Judging by your lack of awareness about the conditions in prewar Iraq I seriously suggest you try a little harder to get your news and information from a much wider variety of sources in the future. quote: ORIGINAL: SilverMark I am sure no one would support what happened in Saddam's Iraq, but the closed nature of the regime and his antipathy towards the West who was truly aware of them? We do not have ground troops in Lybia, it is truly a civil war, with NATO flying support missions, so there is a difference between the situations. I only wish all we had to do in Iraq was to support an insurrection. Wil, where is your proof of Obama being tied to any form of systematic rape? Another inflammatory statement with nothing to it?

tweakabelle -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 7:14:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Yeah, like the systematic rapes by Obama's buddies, the "Arab Spring". Must be spring fever. I've never heard this claim made before. Could you please provide a link or some evidence to support it? If this kind of thing is happening it is indefensible. But I can't form a view until it is clearly shown to be happening. So please supply some evidence if you want your claim to be believed.

hlen5 -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 7:38:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg quote: ORIGINAL: hlen5 quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg but keeping American citizens awake for weeks on end, and forcing them to stand for naked public inspection is ok with you... before their trial..... Here's what I said about Manning's treatment - Post # 7. http://www.collarchat.com/m_3643800/mpage_1/tm.htm Yes, you said, "I'm not crying too many tears over widdle Bwadley. He's a(n alleged) traitor." Which is far different than your Faux Outrage over the previous administration. As a veteran who had a Top Secret Security clearance I know the oath he took and betrayed. Here's the full paragraph: I feel the US needs to act in keeping with our STATED human rights goals. I don't think mistreating Manning is a good idea. That said, as a service member he took an oath that he broke by leaking that mother lode of CLASSIFIED documents. It is not for a 22 year old to arbitrarily decide what needs to be classified and what does not. I'm not crying too many tears over widdle Bwadley. He's a(n alleged) traitor. You're right, I am outraged at the last Administration. I'm also disgusted with this one. Obama is NOT the change that was voted for.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 7:54:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Wilbe wants us to believe Arab Spring is a group, by his inference. However, Arab Spring is a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests that has been taking place in the Arab world since 18 December 2010. He also infers by his statement that the entire group of people involved in these revolutions are committing systematic rape. Wilbe is a typical conservative with his broad general statements about these groups of revolutionaries. Funny when you consider that most, if not all, of these movements are pro democracy. 1. Arab spring is wave of demonstrations....who exactly is doing that demonstrating? Are they capable of acting in a coordinated fashion? 2. ITS IMPLIES NOT INFERS. LEARN FUCKING ENGLISH 3. Ask CNN if they are or arent. Thats where the report I saw was.

jlf1961 -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 8:42:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Wilbe wants us to believe Arab Spring is a group, by his inference. However, Arab Spring is a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests that has been taking place in the Arab world since 18 December 2010. He also infers by his statement that the entire group of people involved in these revolutions are committing systematic rape. Wilbe is a typical conservative with his broad general statements about these groups of revolutionaries. Funny when you consider that most, if not all, of these movements are pro democracy. 1. Arab spring is wave of demonstrations....who exactly is doing that demonstrating? Are they capable of acting in a coordinated fashion? 2. ITS IMPLIES NOT INFERS. LEARN FUCKING ENGLISH 3. Ask CNN if they are or arent. Thats where the report I saw was. Care to back up that statement with a link?

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Atrocities in Islamic countries...against those thought to be rebels. (5/31/2011 8:44:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Wilbe wants us to believe Arab Spring is a group, by his inference. However, Arab Spring is a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests that has been taking place in the Arab world since 18 December 2010. He also infers by his statement that the entire group of people involved in these revolutions are committing systematic rape. Wilbe is a typical conservative with his broad general statements about these groups of revolutionaries. Funny when you consider that most, if not all, of these movements are pro democracy. 1. Arab spring is wave of demonstrations....who exactly is doing that demonstrating? Are they capable of acting in a coordinated fashion? 2. ITS IMPLIES NOT INFERS. LEARN FUCKING ENGLISH 3. Ask CNN if they are or arent. Thats where the report I saw was. Care to back up that statement with a link? What part of "saw on CNN" dont you understand?

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.736328E-02