RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News)

RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Sanity -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 7:33:50 AM)
Saul would be very pleased with the leftists here on these boards as well as with the Rolling Stone propaganda piece quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Saul would be pleased.

SilverMark -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 7:38:01 AM)
The man is just fucking brilliant....I am NOT a fan of the crap he produces and has for so long but, give credit where it is due. From his days with Nixon to Fox News, what a deviously smart and ultimately successful S.O.B. he is! I really enjoyed the article, and it wasn't near as bad a hatchet job as it could have been. It was at least as "Fair and Balanced" as the shows his network produces.

mnottertail -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 7:38:13 AM)
Why are you posting off topic about a King of Israel? And leftists? This is about the fuckwad Roger Ailes and the rabid rightists that are as paraniod and fearmongering as he is.

SternSkipper -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 8:03:56 AM)
quote: Could you work a little harder please? Come on man... his posts bring back the good old days for me, when my best friends and I would all congregate over somebody's house, get wicked high and watch Dr. Strangelove, parroting the lines. When his squirts out one of those "And judging by all the left wing hate directed at him (as evidenced the hatemongering threads for example)" lines, testing the limits of reason, I always think back to General jack Ripper saying "Ever see a commie drink water mandrake?"

SternSkipper -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 8:08:09 AM)
quote: How paranoid are you? You even have to ask? he's placed the title under his name to even try and beat us to that punch

mnottertail -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 8:16:23 AM)
I can see the rapturous headline even now. Roger Ailes bludgeoned to death in own home. The rabid right wing gay group Old Log Cabin Republicans has taken responsibility for the slaying, saying he was dick beat to death for his unkind comments in an article in Rolling Stone earlier this year. Nobody is looking for the killers. Faux Nuze.

flcouple2009 -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 8:23:12 AM)
Oh here dear Sanity, let's try again quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 Who confuses FOX with news? FOX deals in opinions which pander to a certain far right crowd. It's all about generating cash from the crowd. MSNBC saw the success and cash FOX was making and applied that same template to the far left. Again it was about generating cash from that crowd. They simply went left as FOX had already cornered the right. Neither should be confused with news. Both should be ignored in any context of facts.

EternalHoH -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 9:17:06 AM)
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/LimbaughRollingStonesRogerAilesHitPiece/2011/05/27/id/398001 Boo-fucking-hoo

SternSkipper -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 2:04:53 PM)
quote: The rabid right wing gay group Old Log Cabin Republicans has taken responsibility for the slaying, saying he was dick beat to death for his unkind comments in an article in Rolling Stone earlier this year. Hey ... what ever happened to those poor co-opted bastards? Did they break up with their republican boyfriends over gay marriage?

mnottertail -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 2:07:41 PM)
http://www.logcabin.org/site/c.nsKSL7PMLpF/b.5468093/k.BE4C/Home.htm Close as they are going to get to listening to a presidential candidate speaking at their caucus is Norm Coleman. (Senator before Franken, commercial that won it? Norm's gotta go (in a scandinavian accent)).

TheHeretic -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 6:40:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Why are you posting off topic about a King of Israel? Gee, Ron. It's almost like I was referencing a completely different "Saul" altogether, huh? Maybe one who wrote about the importance of attacking an institution by attacking a particular individual, and making him the personification of the institution while simultaneously demonizing him?

Lucylastic -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 6:46:13 PM)
Using Saul is like bringing up Aldolf cant call it godwin tho, godwin would be pissed at the lack of fore thought

TheHeretic -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 6:52:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Using Saul is like bringing up Aldolf How do you figure that, Lucy? You got some 'splaining to do!

Lucylastic -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 6:58:48 PM)
Ive explained it more than once to you Rich, :) Im kinda sorta winding you up... you know perfectly well Saul isnt the pwoer you want him to be:) Thats all my splainin Ricky!! [:D][:D][:D][:D][;)][;)][;)][;)][;)][;)]

Sanity -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 7:06:32 PM)
Didnt you know Rich, or havent you heard? Childs play utilizing semantics is now on par with adults engaging in serious discussion... At least, in certain circles it is. [:)] quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Why are you posting off topic about a King of Israel? Gee, Ron. It's almost like I was referencing a completely different "Saul" altogether, huh? Maybe one who wrote about the importance of attacking an institution by attacking a particular individual, and making him the personification of the institution while simultaneously demonizing him?

Lucylastic -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 7:09:00 PM)
I that your argument, or your way of calling names? you sounds less like a conservative everyday, SNORTS http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3695395

TheHeretic -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 7:37:48 PM)
And as I've said elsewhere, at least in your presence if not to you specifically, Lucy, Machiavelli wasn't any sort of a power either, but writing the book he wrote, got his name permanently attached to the ideas.

Sanity -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (5/31/2011 8:09:41 PM)
I didnt call anyone names in either post Luce... And your semantics game, pretending I did or believing I did, whichever the case Isnt in most circles on par with adults engaging in serious discussion Though in yours perhaps it is, as I alluded to earlier quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I that your argument, or your way of calling names? you sounds less like a conservative everyday, SNORTS http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3695395

mnottertail -> RE: Roger Ailes (Fox News) (6/1/2011 6:44:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Why are you posting off topic about a King of Israel? Gee, Ron. It's almost like I was referencing a completely different "Saul" altogether, huh? Maybe one who wrote about the importance of attacking an institution by attacking a particular individual, and making him the personification of the institution while simultaneously demonizing him? A dick is a dick. Don't matter what the Birchers say.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875