|
Termyn8or -> RE: Roof Advice (4/30/2011 2:46:26 PM)
|
I don't think FHA has a problem with two rooves, but a buyer might. A buyer seeing a new roof on top of another might think you're trying to hide something. And there is a big difference in the price of going over a roof versus a tearoff. Personally, if it isn't leaking I would do nothing. The buyer or their inspector can say something if they want. If you can get up under the roof and see the sheathing and it looks fine - meaning no water stains, I wouldn't worry about it. The problem is when you can't. But if you can't they can't. So if they tear it off and find they have to replace wood, that's $$$. The tearoff is $$$. You said you got a claim approved ? An insurance claim ? Without a leak that's hard to believe. The question is - what's wrong with it ? Not pretty ? A roof has one purpose, to keep the water out. If it is serving that purpose well there is no reason to do anything. I can't be sure about FHA, we don't buy FHA but I know a couple of people who have sold FHA. They are a pain in the ass, but usually about stupid shit. Around here they seem to be concerned with stair railings and such, yet have passed houses with leaking rooves, crumbling foundations or very undesirable plumbing and/or electrical. It may be different in your locale. But here, under normal conditions I would put it in the ad "No FHA". Of course that was then. Now it's a buyer's market so who knows ? I would get a second opinion. In fact the best second opinion would be from the FHA. You might be able to get a pre-sale inspection, and if it passes that is a selling point. The FHA might not do it, but someone will (a licensed inspector) and once you have that piece of paper in your hot little hand, if they say it needs a roof later, guess who pays for it ? Not you or your insurance company. T^T
|
|
|
|