|
Edwynn -> RE: GE pays no taxes. Wow! (3/25/2011 5:13:08 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf I have not seen a single company yet, that if managed properly, their tax bill was the cause of them not being able to grow. Now I have seen some individual taxes that had a huge tax bill, in the middle class. Excellent correlation there, in case it escaped everyone's notice. And yes, I'm trained decently enough in statistics to understand that correlation and causation are two different things, but I'll take consistent results into proper consideration here also. What you read on this matter repeatedly, especially in the NY Times, is that these poor American companies only do all this offshore shuffling because the US corporate tax rates are "among the highest in the most developed countries," suchsame piffling tripe being as sufficient to keep those of predictable political and ideological bent from venturing any further. (sorry liberals, sorry conservatives, even though none of either exist anymore in any reasonable estimation or proper sense since you let the media co-opt the lot of you; if you even have to ask, you've proven the point) Counting on such audience, they feel confident that no one will bother to dig further into it on their own and discover that the US also has "among the lowest actual tax paid vs. statutory requirement among the most developed countries." The NY Times also earns its existence by neglecting to mention in these stories (and what an appropriate word that is here) that these other most developed countries that have these slightly lower corporate tax rates also have ... 1) higher personal tax rates overall, and less loopholes for the highest earners, and actual tax enforcement (what a concept!) for these same highest earners. Contrasting to the US, where the $5M above earners laugh at even the 20%-paying crowd in the putative "35% bracket" who pay "way too much." Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, Netherlands, et al. have amongst each other noticeably different tax schemes, noticeably different social programs, noticeably different federal/state structures, ... The commonality existing there is that the fewer and far less malleable loopholes allowed are more easily administered, and they know how to collect taxes. Period. 2) VAT The US is the only highly developed economy with no value added tax. The only one. Not that I would argue for or against, but to have the NY Times and every other primary US media repeating the bleating of ... "these large corporations say that they would love to be good US corporate taxpayers, but these tax rates are just SO uncompetitive .... wheez ... gasp .... " .... awwww! poor baby! I'm sure that has nothing whatsoever to do with your own personal earnings out of that corporate affair are amongst the lowest in the developed world, does it? Or that the actual burden of the highest .01% earners have the most slippery escape clause from any substantial actual payment of even the post-loophole "obligation," does it? The money has to come from somewhere, bitch. Shut your whining, and shut down the completely useless NY Times while we're at it. The last thing we need from whining is a freakin' echo.
|
|
|
|