LaTigresse
Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006 Status: offline
|
I don't have pet insurance and have never considered getting pet insurance. I am fortunate to have a fairly inexpensive vet. To get Nala's shots and spaying cost less than $300.00. I have 3 dogs, 2 horses and 1 cat. My vet bills are annually, far less than what I am reading quoted for one year of one pet's insurance premiums. I am also fortunate in that I can do a lot of vetting (shots, etc. ) myself. I call and tell them what I want, pick them up, and voila', that night the animal is vaccinated. I am a realist. Dogs, cats, even horses are not meant to live forever. They have very limited lifespans. No amount of money spent at the vet is going to change that. I also believe in quality of life. If my 8 yo pound dog gets a long term illness, she is going to be put down, not medicated, dragging her life out.......for MY selfish reasons. I do not breed or show, purebred animals. All of my animals are spayed/neutered. Not only does this decrease many health problems, it means problems due to pregnancy do not exist. I also keep my animals as healthy as possible with the best food and exercise I can. If I could not afford proper vet care, proper feeding, housing, etc........I should not even have the animals to begin with. Bottom line, there is no financial gain to prolonging a life that can be humanely ended when the quality of life is less than it should be. What real difference does it make if my dog lives 13 years and gets euthanized due diagnosis of diabetes or 15 years after 2 years of expense and misery?
< Message edited by LaTigresse -- 3/21/2011 11:16:54 AM >
_____________________________
My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one! Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!
|