RE: Darwin and D/s (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


LaTigresse -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 11:41:47 AM)

Based upon what I've seen......Darwin applies less and less to human kind.

More and more we protect and care for the weak, the stupid, the challenged. I am not saying that is good or bad, it just is.

Also, based upon many of the couples I see, walking hand in hand, often towing offspring along with them, our society helps them not only survive but flourish. They seem to do a bang up job of hooking up and creating more weak, stupid, challenged, people.

But the bottom line is that I really do not see any correlation between BDSM, power exchange relationships, kink............whatever..........and Darwin.




Prinsexx -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 1:22:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CarnalNightmare

Everyone has different standards for what they consider successful "survival."  Sure everyone starts off idealistic, but then for the most part, they all take what they can get.  A "static unchanging and time frozen assumption," will get you nowhere. 

To put it as romantically as possible; human relationships are a balance of social capital.  People either increase their social capital, lower their standards, or jerk off in front of the TV alone. 


That all seems like a perfect description of settling to me.




Prinsexx -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 1:25:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

I don't believe social Darwinism is a proven concept and even if it is, online doesn't count as a real life environment. When people believe themselves anonymous they act in ways they do not when known. Road rage is a proven example.

I think this is a very good point. The supposed anonymity of online surely does create the most unwarrabted begaviour.
Unless you know enough real people to round 'em up.
Rimours spread like wild fire. And so do Chinese whuspers.
But reputation online, as in real life, is everything.





Prinsexx -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 1:28:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

Or, there is a fourth option:

Not to overanalyze why there are so many people who may be incompatible and be happy that you will be able to spot the right person for you when and if they come around.

Why worry about all the misses, appreciate how they revealed themselves sooner than later and be ok about looking.

It does not matter if you looked for 4 year or 40 years; nothing is worth settling for that does not make you happy.

I don't think it has anything to do with survival of the fittest; who determines that anyway? Sometimes, the higher caliber of a person you are, the harder it is to connect with a similar person.



I agree with these comments also but there is a way that online seems to make comparison a whole lot easier and so keeps pushing the boundaries of desire.




Prinsexx -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 1:35:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrongSpirit

Darwin's theory is mostly about natural selection, not artificial.




Darwin's Theory covers choice at all levels. Don't get me wrong. I am not a fan of evolutionary theory myself. There's a certain irony about the way I introduced the subject.
and it worries me also that evoliyionary theory is replacing many humanist traditions in teaching, in psychology in particular.
What I mean here is that it is becoming ever more difficult to draw the distinctions between natural and artificial especially if one considers how artificial choices go on to become 'real' even though choice may begin here as somehow artificial.





Prinsexx -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 1:36:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrongSpirit

1. Your post, particularly the beginning is confusing. I would fix it. Start by remove everything you thought was funny, cute, or even 'personality'.



Grow up and get a good grip on your dick and shut the fuck up. It is you who are the no-body here so it is you who do not need to be sprouting this shit....  The plain fact is prinsexx had been around here longer then you have so who the fuck are you to say she is unknown? You on the other hand are so far beneath my contempt that this is the last I shall have to do with the likes of you..


Oh I do so love a strong one.....




Prinsexx -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 1:46:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk

Neanderthal Man died out of course due to not discovering hard limits and being unable to work out the difference between a submissive and slave and this is where homo sapiens took over and why many of us are interested in D/s and BDSM.

All part of evolution.



Are you sure about Neanderthal becoming extinct? I was communicating with one only a few weeks ago. He doesn't know he is or indeed who he is but we know who he is and indeed what he is. Isn't the term Meanderthal? (A hybrid of  Meander and Mean? ) who doesn't lnow his arse from his apex? Or was that a bottom from a top?
I need tea......





Prinsexx -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 2:44:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

Anyway, a long way of explaining that humans have developed a tendency to idealize, and to see deviations from that ideal as a thing to oppose, however irrational the ideal may be, and however rational the divergence, whether it arises from simple cognitive dissonance, or political fear of undermining a particularly convenient role, such as that of the domestic housewife.

I'm sure you understand all this, and yeah, there isn't much to do about it, but hand them their asses when we get a chance and keep on keepin' on.


Yes a very long way of explaining social evolition but nevertheless very much appreciated.
However as to your point: ~ humans have developed a tendency to idealize, and to see deviations from that ideal as a thing to oppose,~ I often think of the reality of bdsm not  as opposing deviation from the ideal but as an exaggeration of that opposition, a ritualism of that opposition, an exaggeration of that opposition to the ideal, an inversion of that ideal.

There's no place within evolutionary explanation for relationship formation that account for female supremacy or indeed for consensual slavery ot indeed for many of edgy kink activities which cross over into the taboo.
The 'click fever' which you refer to I think, as a mechanism of choice, is a throw back to idealism. Simply because it gives us all a greater power to discard.




Prinsexx -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 2:48:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RCdc

quote:

That the very thing we say we represent gets pushed aside in the process of matching up, not to the real person, but to a static unchanging and time-frozen assumption of how the other person ought to be?


What is it that 'we' represent? Are you speaking from a group POV or self?

I meant this as the impersonal 'one'.




stellauk -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/17/2011 10:24:49 PM)

Coming back after a discussing on the thread with the OP...

One of the problems I have with Darwin and his theories is that it all appears to be based on predestiny, as if evolution is something which takes place and just happens.

Evolution is driven in my mind by individual creativity and for me creativity is the primary or most fundamental element of not just human nature, but biological nature. At its most primitive level creativity is that will to survive, to develop, to seek food and water, find oneself in the right environment, to procreate and also develop to be stronger, fitter, more aware, more understanding, more intelligent.

Evolution is not really about the survival of the fittest and strongest, but perhaps more about the survival of the more intelligent and creative. Or in one word - thinking.

But evolution isn't just about Nature, it is also the fundamental basis for cognitive learning and developing one's awareness, understanding and perception. It's got everything to do with thinking, communication and behaviour, action, reaction and interaction and it can be said that each and every one of us is following our own individual evolutionary path through "This Lifestyle".

It's about everything in our lives - society, culture, sex, work, family, relationships, even friendships. We live and learn to have relationships, quite literally.

There is no way you can ever hope to learn anything or develop one's awareness, understanding or perception without creativity.

Creativity, like evolution, I believe is cyclical in nature. Take a circle and divide it into quarters, and each quarter represents a specific stage in the creative process.

In the first quarter there is looking at what exists and examining it critically, rejecting it, breaking it down. This is motivated by a need for change. This need for change is synonymous with a need to create.

The second quarter is examining the constituent parts and looking for something better. This requires imagination, it requires the rejection of the existing truth in favour of the illusion of the new truth, which does not yet exist. Therefore it requires some 'belief suspension', i.e. belief in what isn't real or factual, but what is imagined, conceived, envisioned. Simultaneously you are rejecting truth for the illusion, the lie, and in so doing so working to make that lie the truth.

You are creating reality.

The third quarter is to transform that what is the illusion, or the lie, from an imagined concept into the truth or objective (concrete) reality through developing ways of making it happen so that it does become reality and the truth.

The fourth and final quarter is that new truth, that new reality and working to dispel all the illusions, falsehoods and lies.

Lenin once said, 'A lie repeated often enough becomes the truth.' This is why on another thread on lying in Ask A Submissive I stated that it isn't the lie which is important, but the intent and the effect.

I also believe that there is only one constant which exists in the Universe - change. States of permanent unchanging existence or even non-existence are both illusions.

This is why the 'dynamic' is called a 'dynamic' - it is subject to constant change and both Dominant and submissive in a relationship are both working to 'catch the moment' and hold onto it. That 'catching the moment' is the structure of the dynamic, the hierarchy, chain of command, but it is never fixed and so in order to keep being able to 'catch the moment' in their relationship and maintain the structure both need to constantly be creative, to allow for changes and fluctuations in their own thinking, communication and behaviour, just so that they are both able to recreate the dynamic structure in any given situation at will.

This is why 24/7 BDSM TPE in objective physical reality is an illusion, and is only possible as a psychological and emotional concept shared between two or more people (taking into account poly households). This is also why nobody can ever come up with a commonly applicable definition of key terms 'limits', 'slave', 'submissive', 'Master', 'Dominant', outside of cultural and linguistic definitions and parameters.

Prin (the OP) agrees with me in that lying is an 'evolutionary survival mechanism' (her words). I see it similarly but also see it as a test of morality and of moral values and principles.

We all exist online but unlike in real life we have the complete freedom to be who we want to be, believe ourselves to be, or want others to perceive us to be. Everyone else has no other choice but to take you purely at face value, and you have complete freedom to make moral choices and decide whether to be honest and show who you really are in some way online, or to hide behind a persona.

Even when you decide to hide behind a persona you are making a moral choice. Taking into consideration what has been written above, you can quite legitimately create a persona for positive or morally sound reasons, for example for reasons of personal self-development and for your self-preservation.
This is perfectly natural to do so and is no different from the red, black and yellow non-venomous king snake which is imitating the red yellow and black highly venomous coral snake. Knowing which is which requires knowing 'red on yellow, kill a fellow' but clearly indicates the same principle in Nature as the human principle online.

Therefore it is not always the case when someone's online persona doesn't match their real life persona that the intention is always to deceive, mislead, exploit or harm. However the fear and distrust is also quite natural. Far better to consider the possibility that the king snake might be a coral snake than to discover that the coral snake really wasn't a king snake when you have neurotoxic venom in your bloodstream.

Let's face it, a sizeable proporton of these threads on these boards are started on the basis of some illusion - whether it be an inexperienced person seeking the truth in their own illusions by starting the sub/slave or limits threads or through a distorted sense of self through the perceived illusion of social and cultural privilege which starts the endemic fat threads, trans threads, scammer threads, sociopath threads, fake threads and so on.

I wouid even contend that evolution and survival is a matter of mental effort and individual creativity over stuff like looks, appearance, body size, gender and sexual orientation and it is this in reality - and not the commonly accepted hierarchy of social privilege - which determines who survives here and evolves in a BDSM sense and who doesn't.

And it is where the mental effort and individual creativity ends that the problems we all eprceive and many experience begin.




Wheldrake -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/18/2011 12:31:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk

One of the problems I have with Darwin and his theories is that it all appears to be based on predestiny, as if evolution is something which takes place and just happens.



But that's exactly the power of Darwinian natural selection. Biological evolution really does "just happen" - as long as you've got a pool of genetic variants, some of which confer an advantage in survival and reproduction, the advantageous variants will spread and the nature of the species will change.

Cultural evolution is different, but the agents of cultural evolution - human beings - were nevertheless shaped by biological evolution. Our biological nature must influence and even constrain, at some level, the pathways cultural evolution can take.




IronBear -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/19/2011 8:29:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

Nice helmet and sword.


Thank you and it isn't even Gorean but rather Celtic generically speaking..

The sword, 3 handed, heavy truck spring based wirth truck (semi trailer) towball to balance the sword known locally as "That bloody hunk of metal) has shattered many prettier swords in metal weapons combat.. Their swords costing usually $200 -n $300 where as mine cost inc time and labor less then $80.. Mine weighs 15 lbs and I wield it in handed left or right hand and reverse it easily such is the balance..




MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Darwin and D/s (3/20/2011 5:39:17 PM)

 
Water finds its own level... simple as that. [sm=smile.gif]





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1400146