RE: Social Security (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Real0ne -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:03:35 PM)

Statutory Instrument 1997 No. 1778

The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997

© Crown Copyright 1997
Statutory Instruments printed from this website are printed under the superintendence and authority of the Controller of HMSO being the Queen's Printer of Acts of Parliament.The legislation contained on this web site is subject to Crown Copyright protection. It may be reproduced free of charge provided that it is reproduced accurately and that the source and copyright status of the material is made evident to users.

snippetty snip snip

The text of this Internet version of the Statutory Instrument which is published by the Queen's Printer of Acts of Parliament has been prepared to reflect the text as it was Made. A print version is also available and is published by The Stationery Office Limited as the The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 , ISBN 0 11 064698 3. The print version may be purchased by clicking here. Braille copies of this Statutory Instrument can also be purchased at the same price as the print edition by contacting TSO Customer Services on 0870 600 5522 or e-mail:[email protected].

snippetty snip snip

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS

1997 No. 1778
SOCIAL SECURITY

The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997
  Made 22nd July 1997     Coming into force 1st September 1997 

At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 22nd day of July 1997 Present,  The Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in Council

Whereas at London on the 13th February 1984 an Agreement on social security between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement") and an Administrative Agreement for the implementation of the Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the Administrative Agreement")[1] were signed on behalf of those Governments and effect was given to the Agreement by the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1984 (hereinafter referred to as "the Principal Order")[2]:

snippetty snip snip

2. A person who has satisfied the first contribution condition for sickness benefit as defined in Article 1 using contributions under the laws of Great Britain, Northern Ireland or the Isle of Man only, who is in the territory of the United States and is not subject to the laws on coverage of Great Britain, Northern Ireland or the Isle of Man under Articles 4, 5 or 6 of this Agreement, shall be entitled to receive invalidity benefit under the laws of Great Britain, Northern Ireland or the Isle of Man provided that:



sort of makes your assholes pucker dont it?



who was it again that won the revolutionary war?  I forget!


OWNED!







tazzygirl -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:14:39 PM)

Not quite sure what you are implying.




Real0ne -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:18:21 PM)


I thought it was pretty clear!

OWNED!

lol

(some people have a real bitch of a time wrapping their minds around the reality that the good ole USofA is nothing more than another feudal brit colony)

They rearranged the flowers and changed a few colors and we drive on the opposite side of the street so that proof that we are not like those brits.  we have freedom!   The declaration of independence says so!  LMAO








tazzygirl -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:20:41 PM)

Actually you left quite a bit out. How about spelling out your position or reason for posting what you posted.

In reality.. something you know little about... i could care less, and i certainly wont waste my time... in dealing with your little tantrum about how the US is owned.

For those who want a more... hmmm... understandble accounting of what RO is going on about...

https://www.socialsecurity.gov/international/Agreement_Texts/uk.html




Real0ne -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:27:28 PM)

my response to the op of course

quote:

My question is where did the money go.





tazzygirl -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:28:47 PM)

The money didnt go to the UK, its in Treasury Bills... but that doesnt fit into your little tin hat world.




Real0ne -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:35:14 PM)

tsk tsk now

Totalization Agreement with the United Kingdom
SSA Publication No. 05-10199, May 2005, ICN 444918 [OMB Approval Number: 0960-0554 Expires 10/31/2013]

Coverage and Social Security taxes
Certificate of coverage
Monthly benefits
A U.K. pension may affect your U.S. benefit
What you need to know about Medicare
Claims for benefits
For more information
 
Introduction


An agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom (U.K.) improves Social Security protection for people who work or have worked in both countries.  It helps many people who, without the agreement, would not be eligible for monthly retirement, disability or survivors benefits under the Social Security system of one or both countries.  It also helps many people who would otherwise have to pay Social Security taxes to both countries on the same earnings.

The provisions of the agreement that eliminate double Social Security taxation became effective January 1, 1985.  The provisions which permit persons who meet certain conditions to use their work in both countries to qualify for benefits became effective January 1, 1988.  For purposes of the agreement, references to the United Kingdom include England; Scotland; Wales; Northern Ireland; the Isle of Man; and the Channel Islands of Jersey, Guernsey, Alderney, Herm, and Jethou. 

The agreement covers Social Security taxes (including the U.S. Medicare portion) and Social Security retirement, disability and survivors insurance benefits.  It doesn't cover benefits under the U.S. Medicare program or the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program.




are we havin fun yet?

Sieg Hail to the Queen!



owned get used to it!







tazzygirl -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:42:33 PM)

Yeah, you are that dense. Its a give-take on both sides of the "pond"

Why didnt you post more?

The agreement may help you, your family and your employer
• While you work––If your work is covered by both the U.S. and the U.K. Social Security systems, you (and your employer, if you are employed) would normally have to pay Social Security taxes to both countries for the same work. However, the agreement eliminates this double coverage, so you pay taxes to only one system (see the section on "Coverage and Social Security taxes").
•When you apply for benefits––You may have some Social Security credits in both the United States and the United Kingdom but not enough to be eligible in one country or the other. The agreement makes it easier to qualify for benefits by letting you add together your Social Security credits in both countries. For more details, see the section on "Monthly benefits".

Before the agreement, employees, employers and self-employed persons could, under certain circumstances, be required to pay Social Security taxes to both the United States and the United Kingdom for the same work.

Under the agreement, if you work as an employee in the United States, you normally will be covered by the United States, and you and your employer will pay Social Security taxes only to the United States. If you work as an employee in the United Kingdom, you normally will be covered by the United Kingdom, and you and your employer pay Social Security taxes only to the United Kingdom.

On the other hand, if your employer sends you from one country to work for that employer or an affiliate in the other country for five years or less, you will continue to be covered by your home country and you will be exempt from coverage in the other country. For example, if a U.S. company sends an employee to work for that employer or an affiliate in the United Kingdom for no more than five years, the employer and the employee will continue to pay only U.S. Social Security taxes and will not have to pay in the United Kingdom.

If you are self-employed and reside in the United States or the United Kingdom, you generally will be covered and taxed only by the country where you reside.

People working on the U.K. continental shelf are considered to be working in the United Kingdom.



Summary of agreement rules
The following table shows whether your work is covered under the U.S. or U.K. Social Security system. If you are covered under U.S. Social Security, you and your employer (if you are an employee) must pay U.S. Social Security taxes. If you are covered under the U.K. system, you and your employer (if you are an employee) must pay U.K. Social Security taxes."Certificate of coverage" section explains how to get a form from the country where you are covered that will prove you are exempt in the other country.

.......

You make it sound like only UK workers benefit. Nice try. How about pulling that tin hat off for a while.




Real0ne -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:48:10 PM)

Oh no need to get flustered that we in America know the grand bullshit stories about freedom and winning the revolutionary war.

Bragging about the benefits of America being owned by the queen does not change the fact that America is one big ole feudal colony extension of the great britanic king and OWNED!   Now does it?



Oh and did I ever teach you peeps about the origin of the word "FREEDOM"?

In England what they would do is take the iron shackles off of the slaves when they were house broken and then put the invisible shackles around their neck with an oath to be SUBJECT to and SERVE the lord!

Just like the "subject to" clause of the 14th amendment!

and

I pledge allegiance to the lord.....   Kool huh?

Its called "enfranchisement" and BOND slavery or enfranchisement is the official meaning of FREEDOM.  (nothing left to lose)  *Some one else who did her homework*

owned get used to it!




tazzygirl -> RE: Social Security (12/31/2010 11:51:09 PM)

~yawns~

Same ole bs, brand new year. Im off to bed.




Real0ne -> RE: Social Security (1/1/2011 12:02:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

~yawns~

Same ole bs, brand new year. Im off to bed.



Morpheus : I imagine that right now you're feeling a bit like Alice...

Neo : .....?

Morpheus : Tumbling down the rabbit hole? Hmm?

Neo : You....could say that.

Morpheus : I can see it in your eyes. You have the look of a man who accepts what he sees, because he is expecting to wake up. Ironically, this is not far from the truth....
Morpheus : Do you believe in fate, Neo?

Neo : No.

Morpheus : Why?

Neo : Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my own life.

Morpheus : I know..._exactly_ what you mean. Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know, you can't explain. But you feel it. You've felt it your entire life. That there's something wrong_ with the world.

You don't know what it is, but it's there...like a splinter in you're mind, driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me. Do you _know_ what I'm talking about?

Neo : The Matrix?

Morpheus : Do you want to know...._what_ _it_ is....?

Neo nods

Morpheus : The Matrix is everywhere. It's all around us, even in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go to work, when you pay your taxes. The Matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes, to blind you from the truth.

Neo : What truth?

Morpheus : That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else, you were born into bondage, born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch. A prison...for your  mind....Unfortunatly, no one can be..._told_ what the Matrix is...you have to see it for yourself.

Morpheus opens a container which holds two pills : a blue one, and a red one. He puts one in each hand, and holds them out to Neo.

Morpheus : This is your _last chance_. After this, there is no turning back.....You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up and belive...whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill.....you stay in wonderland...and I show you just how deep the rabbit hole goes.


People cant handle the truth so they tell you in the fantasy world of sci fi.

The fantasy movie "specifically" about the social security system was the wizard of oz.

Take the blue pill and sleep well!

OWNED!

LMAO




Termyn8or -> RE: Social Security (1/1/2011 4:23:34 AM)

Look, what I see basically is that if you worked in both countries, that country wants to define who can collect on their system and who cannot. I'm not sure what you're reading into it, but I don't see much more than that. That is not proof you are owned. I am not saying you're not, but that's not proof, it is only your conclusion, or that of your "teacher(s)" . What you presented could possible supplant other evidence, but it does not stand on it's own, even for me. For others here, they haven't a clue what the fuck you're talking about for the most part. This goes back to the fact that we are still tied to England in a way, more than I like, more than a simple treaty. I am aware of that but it doesn't really matter.

Listen up Real, and listen good. You are not owned because of some document pertaining to entitlements and their proportionment when people work and or operate internationally, unless you want to concede that by extension we are owned by a foreign power. I don't buy it. There is one law here. The Magna Carta doesn't mean shit and neither could any treaty. Not only will provisions of illicit treaties be rejected by the People, they are usurped by this government all the time. In short we do whatever the fuck we want.

What can constrain us now ? What intelligence could be smart enough to thwart the power of the people without bullets ? None. Therefore they look busy trying to govern as effectively (for them of course) as possible, and as completely. That is why a million monkeys churn out the works of Shakespeare every day. They would regulate masturbation if they could, if they thought it would keep them in power. They think by writing this shit that it will happen, it is a combination of flippancy and hubris. And it doesn't work. They write more laws and we do what we want to do. So they write even more laws and we do what we want to do. You see, they can't win in the end unless you let them.

The fact is you are owned in ways that would astound you. You agree to be owned, therefore pay into SS. You expect to be taken care of. That is what truly transfers the ownership. I am owned by an insurance company. Because I don't want to deal financially with the possibility of a fire, I cede part of the ownership of me to them. They require certain things. They require that the house be in safe order, wiring in good shape, things like that. I thought this was my house. Most recently they required me to add gravel to the driveway. Damn, just when I got the old shit packed down. I liked it, it was becoming like cement, that I don't feel like paying for. Next year they will most likely require that I repair the sidewalk. Know how they can get away with that ? They cover liability, I don't need to pay a million dollar judgement.

Because by accepting coverage for these losses I am no longer responsible to pay for them. They have to pay if something happens to me. That is the root of their authority. No law is needed, if I don't like it, they can just cancel my policy, and in a way give up that responsibility, and with it the authority and therefore by definition their "ownership" of me, or my property.

If you want to think in those terms that is fine. You want to be free ? What if you get hurt ? You have an extra thirty grand laying around for a hospital bill, and even more if you do, do you want to pay it ? So if you have health coverage, how about we figure out the math. The insurance company needs money to pay these claims, in the best of circumstances. The policyholders are a group in a way. If capitalisation is $30 million and a claim comes in for $40 million, the company can't pay, then what happens ? In that light, would you want to be in the group with test pilots, idiots deserving of a Darwin, Evil Knevil, crackheads or cat burglars ? Hell no, they would kick up the rates, or go under. Which do you prefer.

Refuse to be owned, go right ahead. You want to go live in the woods like Randy Weaver, hey, it actually sounds good to me. Then you will be free. And you will be free of society, medical care, any form of help if marauders come to take your belongings, or family. You will be free of the prohibition against people running planes or cars into the front door of your log cabin after wrecking your corn field. You will be free of black pipe regulations associated with getting natural gas you purchase into your house in an efficient way because you'll heat with wood, which you will cut with your own axe. Crumble up some dry leaves etc. and go find some clay with which to make bricks, and use mud for mortar, because then you will be free of getting the "mark" in the form of license plates for a truck to go buy bricks. And what will you trade for those bricks if you can overcome that obstacle ? Trade the some fruits and vegetables you grew ?

Face it, nobody wants total freedom.

T




Real0ne -> RE: Social Security (1/2/2011 8:34:23 AM)

thats tooooo much to parse out and comment on in one sitting, lots of places to explain the intricacies involved and not enough time.  

heres one for ya....

lets sum it up.

We elect to be beneficiaries that makes them the trustees responsible for paying the taxes and the bills.

Why are we paying the taxes and the bills?

They cannot have it both ways in law!

(or can they?)






Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125