RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Fellow -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 2:48:48 PM)

quote:

Uh, okay.

Since you brought it up, what corruption have Reid, Frank, Pelosi, and Schumer been involved in?

And please provide specific details.


Are you joking or insane?




slvemike4u -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 2:51:03 PM)

Nah,I think he is serious.....I mean what the fuck,how hard can it be,you said they were corrupt...now all you need do is detail the facts of their malfeasence.




rulemylife -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 3:05:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow

quote:

Uh, okay.

Since you brought it up, what corruption have Reid, Frank, Pelosi, and Schumer been involved in?

And please provide specific details.


Are you joking or insane?



Nice dodge.

But if you are going to say it then back it up.

Don't just throw out loose accusations as if it is common knowledge.

Provide the proof.




EternalHoH -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 3:11:06 PM)

Democrat version of Palin?

If you discount their difference in backgrounds, and focused on their mean-spirited, ice cold politics, then I'd say Teddy Kennedy.




slvemike4u -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 3:29:26 PM)

You're shitting me ...Ted Kennedy the Liberal Lion of the Senate?




Edwynn -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 3:50:51 PM)


Palin is nice looking enough but what got the attention is the photo shots of her wearing a stars and stripes bikini and posing with the rifle.

Now that's hot!

I don't think the Democrats could come up with anything to match that. You never know, though. If Lindsay Lohan were a registered Democrat maybe they could have a shoot with her in prison colored rough hemmed lingerie. Might work, might not.




EternalHoH -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 3:51:57 PM)

Liberal lion?   Liberal jackass.

Both have an arrogance that a lack of accountability to their past means nothing going forward, both suffer from foot-in-mouth disease.




Musicmystery -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 3:53:31 PM)

And now that he's dead, they should accomplish about the same.




slvemike4u -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 3:54:23 PM)

I think Ted is beyond his suffering.....any diseases notwithstanding.




slvemike4u -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 3:57:04 PM)

And add to that ....Any arrogence Ted suffered from was accompanied by a more than passing knowledge of the issues he was speaking of.....Palin operates under no such "encumbrance"
The comparison holds no water at all....cepting maybe your dislike for both individuals...which is cool and all,but does not justify your attempt to place the two of them in the same box.,




Fellow -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 5:46:16 PM)

quote:

Nice dodge.
But if you are going to say it then back it up.
Don't just throw out loose accusations as if it is common knowledge.
Provide the proof.


It is a common knowledge. At least it it should be. Obviously, many brain dead Democrats ignore this knowledge or are OK with it. These days everyone can do their own investigation: lot of it can be studied in more detail using just the Internet resources.
Dodd-Frank-Schumer are just an extension to financial services industry interest.  Follow the line and you will not be dissappointed what you find. All this garbage is funneled through Pelosi-Reid axis.
These people have accumulated significant amount of personal wealth while "working hard" in the Congress. (Hard to compete with Clintons though who reported earnings 107 million during 2001 to 2007). Reid had his sons working as lobbyists, now he moves them into big politics. Even Reid election win is considered highly suspicious (after all we are in Las Vegas).
Here are some headlines for you:
Bankers get 4 trillion gift from Barney Frank   [ http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2009-12-29/bankers-get-4-trillion-gift-from-barney-frank-david-reilly.html ]
"Paloma Partners received $200 million in federal bailout money in 2009, shortly before the company gave Barney Frank a free vacation in the Virgin Islands with a free trip on a $25 million jet plane included."
[   http://www.zimbio.com/Freddie+Mac/articles/xvvh1qtimS8/Barney+Frank+accepted+free+trip+hedge+fund  ]
Here is Pelosi affection with the US Air Force:
[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6_xgKWzhRw&feature=player_embedded ]
Or her novel approach to the legislation: (ignore the pork and favors)
[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GlGvIBYRuQ&feature=related ]

These are just a few examples.  These people are the crooks above the law. Do not come out with the arguments: never proven, never convicted.






TreasureKY -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 6:27:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


Palin is nice looking enough but what got the attention is the photo shots of her wearing a stars and stripes bikini and posing with the rifle.

Now that's hot!


You do know that was a fake, don't you?

http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_sarah_palin_bikini_pic.htm




Edwynn -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 6:43:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


Palin is nice looking enough but what got the attention is the photo shots of her wearing a stars and stripes bikini and posing with the rifle.

Now that's hot!


You do know that was a fake, don't you?

http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_sarah_palin_bikini_pic.htm



Yes, and I assumed everyone did by now. It was invoked in the spirit of the silliness of the whole premise.






DarkSteven -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/6/2010 7:36:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EternalHoH

Democrat version of Palin?

If you discount their difference in backgrounds, and focused on their mean-spirited, ice cold politics, then I'd say Teddy Kennedy.



Huh?  Kennedy was known for getting deals done, and in being a Senator.  Palin's a talking head, an endorser, a speechmaker.  Whether you liked Kennedy or not, you had to admit that he got stuff done.  Palin's a quitter and I doubt she'll ever hold elected office again.




popeye1250 -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/7/2010 12:51:51 PM)

Hey Dems, I understand Helen Thomas is available.
And you could have Rosy O'Dumbo on deck![:D]




rulemylife -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/7/2010 1:45:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EternalHoH

Liberal lion?   Liberal jackass.

Both have an arrogance that a lack of accountability to their past means nothing going forward, both suffer from foot-in-mouth disease.



You obviously disliked Ted Kennedy, and he had his problems, even so you have to admit he was an intelligent, articulate man with firm beliefs who did a lot of good for this country.

To compare him with Palin, a woman whose main interest is becoming a celebrity, is beyond ridiculous.







popeye1250 -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/7/2010 1:55:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: EternalHoH

Liberal lion?   Liberal jackass.

Both have an arrogance that a lack of accountability to their past means nothing going forward, both suffer from foot-in-mouth disease.



You obviously disliked Ted Kennedy, and he had his problems, even so you have to admit he was an intelligent, articulate man with firm beliefs who did a lot of good for this country.

To compare him with Palin, a woman whose main interest is becoming a celebrity, is beyond ridiculous.






Rule, take another slug of that Kool-Ade.
I'm from Massachusetts and Ted Kennedy was a nasty drunk who was famous for stiffing bartenders and waitresses. He'd slip into the gents and then slip out the door without paying.
What do they say about people who treat bartenders and waitresses badly?
He was expelled from Harvard for cheating.
"Articulate?" "I,...ah,...ah,....think that,.....ah, ah, we should, .....ah,....ah....."
He was called "The Wizzard of Ahs!"




rulemylife -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/7/2010 2:30:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow

quote:

Nice dodge.
But if you are going to say it then back it up.
Don't just throw out loose accusations as if it is common knowledge.
Provide the proof.


It is a common knowledge. At least it it should be. Obviously, many brain dead Democrats ignore this knowledge or are OK with it. These days everyone can do their own investigation: lot of it can be studied in more detail using just the Internet resources.
Dodd-Frank-Schumer are just an extension to financial services industry interest.  Follow the line and you will not be dissappointed what you find. All this garbage is funneled through Pelosi-Reid axis.
These people have accumulated significant amount of personal wealth while "working hard" in the Congress. (Hard to compete with Clintons though who reported earnings 107 million during 2001 to 2007). Reid had his sons working as lobbyists, now he moves them into big politics. Even Reid election win is considered highly suspicious (after all we are in Las Vegas).
Here are some headlines for you:
Bankers get 4 trillion gift from Barney Frank   [ http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2009-12-29/bankers-get-4-trillion-gift-from-barney-frank-david-reilly.html ]
"Paloma Partners received $200 million in federal bailout money in 2009, shortly before the company gave Barney Frank a free vacation in the Virgin Islands with a free trip on a $25 million jet plane included."
[   http://www.zimbio.com/Freddie+Mac/articles/xvvh1qtimS8/Barney+Frank+accepted+free+trip+hedge+fund  ]
Here is Pelosi affection with the US Air Force:
[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6_xgKWzhRw&feature=player_embedded ]
Or her novel approach to the legislation: (ignore the pork and favors)
[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GlGvIBYRuQ&feature=related ]

These are just a few examples.  These people are the crooks above the law. Do not come out with the arguments: never proven, never convicted.



I don't even know where to begin.

First, your admonishment about never being convicted holds no weight because there was nothing to bring charges on, much less to convict. 

There was nothing that even rises to the the level of an ethics violation in any of your links.

Do I think some of these things were inappropriate?  Yes, but they are not the corruption you claim.  This is standard operating procedure for Congress.  I can give you the same type of laundry list using Republican politicians. 

Pelosi's predecessor, Dennis Hastert, was far more notorious for taking advantage of Congressional perks.

So, let's not make this about Democrats.

If you want to reform Congressional rules, fine, but to claim there was any corruption here is a ridiculous reach.    




rulemylife -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/7/2010 2:43:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Rule, take another slug of that Kool-Ade.
I'm from Massachusetts and Ted Kennedy was a nasty drunk who was famous for stiffing bartenders and waitresses. He'd slip into the gents and then slip out the door without paying.
What do they say about people who treat bartenders and waitresses badly?
He was expelled from Harvard for cheating.
"Articulate?" "I,...ah,...ah,....think that,.....ah, ah, we should, .....ah,....ah....."
He was called "The Wizzard of Ahs!"



Yeah, I was waiting to hear from you on this Popeye.

The problem is you focus on his personal issues.  Which may or may not be true.  The thing is I don't really care.

We elect people to do a job and that is what I judge them on, what they have or have not done while in office.

Personally I don't care if he was banging those waitresses and still not tipping them.




DarkSteven -> RE: Democrat's need their own Sarah Palin! (11/7/2010 2:50:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: EternalHoH

Liberal lion?   Liberal jackass.

Both have an arrogance that a lack of accountability to their past means nothing going forward, both suffer from foot-in-mouth disease.



You obviously disliked Ted Kennedy, and he had his problems, even so you have to admit he was an intelligent, articulate man with firm beliefs who did a lot of good for this country.

To compare him with Palin, a woman whose main interest is becoming a celebrity, is beyond ridiculous.



Rule, take another slug of that Kool-Ade.
I'm from Massachusetts and Ted Kennedy was a nasty drunk who was famous for stiffing bartenders and waitresses. He'd slip into the gents and then slip out the door without paying.
What do they say about people who treat bartenders and waitresses badly?
He was expelled from Harvard for cheating.
"Articulate?" "I,...ah,...ah,....think that,.....ah, ah, we should, .....ah,....ah....."
He was called "The Wizzard of Ahs!"



popeye, what's your point?  Are you saying that Palin is like Kennedy because she goes to bars and stiffs bartenders?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625