splorff
Posts: 386
Joined: 2/23/2008 Status: offline
|
I strongly disagree with withholding food and water. Just because someone appears to be unconscious, it does not follow that they are. A woman in the UK was anaethetised and then they began her surgery. She experienced the whole thing, but was not able to move or speak. She was disbelieved until she told them their entire conversation throughout her ordeal. She was able to wiggle her toes. She heard the surgeon say that she should not have been able to do that, but the anaethetist closed him down. It must have been awful for her. Now try and imagine the agony of dying of thirst while you are somehow conscious. In the UK, they put a sign upon the bed which says : nil by mouth. This means you are targeted for no water and no food. I too would like to see some medical responses. I can see no reason for it apart from it saves nurses bothering with feeding and bed pans. If that is what it really is about, I think it's shameful. quote:
ORIGINAL: StrangerThan I've watched a lot of older folks die. Not nearly as many as doctors and nurses, but coming from a large family, it has been a fact of life. To give some perspective, I remember my great-great-grandmother, 5 greats, all my grandparents, their sisters, brothers.. well you get the picture. Most passed from old age, I reckon, a couple from cancer, another one from heart problems. Even so, we're talking upper 70's to upper 90's as the age ranges. In the past couple of weeks, we've had two deaths in the family, a grandparent, a great-uncle. I don't know if I've just been blind in the past, but in witnessing the decline of these last two, a large number of similarities sprang to mind that cover the final few days. The final passing was presaged by the same types of care in many cases, that being hospice. I'm not going to go into great detail, nor am I questioning the care itself, it just struck me that part of the process of providing comfort for the final days is sorta what actually kills the patient. Hospice folk provide good care. They can tell within hours of when someone will pass. But... part of the care is termed comfort. That has generally meant, at least from what I've seen in my own family, drugs to ease the pain, and foregoing things like food and water. Most couldn't eat if they tried. Most are unconscious. But seems to me the lack of fluid is the actual killer. Face it, take water away and people die within a week or two. The thought surfaces if these are reallly the stages of natural death or in actuality, the stages of dying from thirst. From that springs another side issue, that of assisted suicide. At least one state, Oregon, has legislation on the books that will allow an otherwise competant person of sound mind who is terminally ill, to have some say in the timing and nature of their death. There are plenty of arguments pro and con, but having watched this enough times, I'm pretty much on the pro side. I'm interested in comments from those in the health care field because it seems to me the role of the care provider in the last few days is both to provide comfort, but also maybe, hasten death? That's a bad way of putting it but the emperical evidence seems to suggest it. Then again, although I know what I see, I have little knowledge as to how that breaks down in terms of natural things. I'm not looking for arguments, but more so an understanding.
|