RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


shivermetimbers -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/7/2010 12:54:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marie2


One of them has already died in prison. I can't remember which one of them it was, but she had terminal cancer, and they wouldn't even release her to die at home.


I am not cutting the rest of your statement out in some attempt to put you down in anyway.  However, the statement itself really hits home. It's almost a shame that there is some sentimentality that this "cancer" victime couldn't die "at home".  A baby never had a life, a mother never shared life with a child, and that's just the beginning.  IMHO....too fucking bad for the bitch. Susan Atkins is the cunt who too many felt forlorn about because she was never released from prison to go home.  I only wish she would have live many more years, instead of gracefully dying last September. I don't want to hear her apologies, I don't want to hear her defense...may the cunt rot in hell.  And before the "judge not lest ye be judged crowd" chimes in......my sins NEVER will carry stabbing a woman and her baby (the child was 8 1/2 months old, it was a person ready to come into the world).  Fuck her, fuck her, fuck her, fuck her, and fuck her again. I don't give a damn how sorry she may ever profess to be.

I am not in any way intending to direct this at the poster. I am in no way implying that you feel remorse for the murderer, as you never said that.  I am only pointing out that at one point, there was and still are some media types who want to  somehow disassociate the followers from Manson and make them victims.  The victims are, and always will be, the Tates and Labiancas..




Rule -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/7/2010 1:34:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage
quote:

or offer him a chance to regain honor by one or more battles to the death against other convicts; the stadium and broadcast proceeds would then serve to pay or compensate for the crime.

Wow!   What an original idea!  I like that WAY better than just putting someone to sleep, but the other end of that is what if they survive and get back out to do more of the same?  I guess that time put them to sleep?  Until the person has had some kind of help to help them not commit the crime again, I don't think that they will stop or they will always suffer with their desire to commit the act. 

Simply repeat the method, adding one more duel to the death to the previous number of duels. So if after first offense there is a contract to pay damages and compensation and zero duels to the death, after a second offense paying damages and compensation and one duel to the death follows, and after a third offense paying damages and compensation and two duels to the death follows. There is fifty per cent chance that the convict will survive the second offense. And only one in the original eight convicts will survive the third duel for a third offense.

Treatment and help may be paid out of the stadium and broadcast and book proceeds. Also there will be savings on jail costs.

Both the convict who dies in a duel and the convict who survives will have regained honor.

There will always be risk - but life would be deadly boring without risk. Society and mankind do need criminals, some of whom may be instruments of the Divine.




Hippiekinkster -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/7/2010 1:50:21 AM)

BKsir: "I disagree. You don't sound heartless. Murderers, rapists, drug pushers, ..."

So what do you have against Capitalists? What is wrong with selling unapproved molecules? if it is a transaction between adults, why is it the business of a bunch of desk jockey pricks or the Pigs? Who in the fuck are you to tell me that I cannot obtain pain medication without going through the gauntlet of seeing a Primary Care physician, then getting x-rays and MRIs, then seeing a pain specialist, every single month at a cost of $100USD, the paying for the meds, peeing in a fucking cup every two or three months, having to pay $1000 out of pocket the beginning of each year, because of the fucked-up drug patent laws in the US, just because I have degenerative disc disease, fucked knees, bad feet, peripheral neuropathy, a bad eye because of a detached retina, and all kinds of other shit.

So what do you have against people making free decisions?




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/7/2010 4:37:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

I am torn on this one, the fact that she was 19 when she was involved in the murders is an issue.

On the other hand, shouldn't you be accountable for your actions, even at the age of 19?
Do you think Leslie Van Houten, should be given parole?


I agree with you. For some crimes - and first degree murder is one of them - life should mean simply "life." Period.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini
By the way, this is Leslie's 19th time in front of the parole board.
Leslie has been trying to get out for almost 20 years.



And how many years have Leno and Rosemary LaBianca been waiting to be brought back from the dead? Fuck her. Let her rot.




Toppingfrmbottom -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/7/2010 5:39:57 PM)

I am normally a kind, caring, sensitive person.

However when it comes to this, I feel they don't deserve a kind and gentle death, they didn't give their victoms one, why should they have one.

I feel you forfeit your right to any kind of "gentle" or  kind treatment that includes gentleness in death for being such a cruel inhuman and god awful monster.


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage



I have to agree with this.  She was 19 yrs old. 

Other than that, this is why I'm for the death penalty.  I think it is far more inhumane to keep a person in prison for the entirety of their life.  However, I think that when the death sentence is carried out, it should be done in the most humane way possible.  There has been some question as to whether or not lethal injection causes pain.  I don't see why they can't come up with a combination of drugs for lethal injection that won't be painful.  Something that just puts a person to sleep. 





TheHeretic -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/7/2010 10:27:09 PM)

In this case, the death penalty was completely appropriate. No pesky lingering questions of innocence, no claims that DNA will reveal the true killers. They should all die in prison for what they did.

I think life in prison should mean exactly that. The best hope for such a convict should be a nice minimum security nursing home, when he is too feeble to do any more harm.




kinkbound -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/7/2010 11:11:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

I have always been fascinated by Charles Manson and his followers.
Leslie Van Houten was 19 years old and the youngest member of the Manson family,
when she was convicted of murder and conspiracy, for her participation in the LaBianca's murder, shortly after the Sharon-Tate murders.
 
Initially, Van Houten was sentenced to death along with the other members of the Manson family.
Later their sentences were reduced to life in prison.

Should a life sentence ALWAYS mean a life sentence?

By all accounts, Van Houten has been a model prisoner for 41 years, and she is hoping to be paroled.
I am torn on this one, the fact that she was 19 when she was involved in the murders is an issue.

On the other hand, shouldn't you be accountable for your actions, even at the age of 19?
Do you think Leslie Van Houten, should be given parole?

By the way, this is Leslie's 19th time in front of the parole board.
Leslie has been trying to get out for almost 20 years.


Manson follower faces parole board for 19th time - U.S. news - msnbc.com



One first needs to determine whether prison's primary objective is to punish or rehabilitate. If it's to rehabilitate, then one also needs to determine if Van Houten has been rehabilitated.





Cherylmazana -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/7/2010 11:40:29 PM)

I don’t look at it as rehabilitation or punishment, rehabilitation rarely happens in either of our countries, and as for the punishment side of it, there are many people in the world who would long to have free room and board for life even if it meant being locked up.

For myself I think prison is mainly just a way to temporarily or permanently keep the public safe, I don’t care about revenge or even justice, I just want me and mine kept safe, lock them up or kill them, either way solves the problem by keeping them away from others they can hurt.

If someone is dead or locked away in prison they can’t commit other murders, after all just how many people out on parole commit crimes they would not have been able to if they were still locked up, I am sure all the victims and families are very understanding that the parole board were convinced that the prisoner had been rehabilitated.

Cheryl




LafayetteLady -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 12:37:08 AM)

None of the Manson Family currently in prison will ever be paroled, we all know that deep down. There are still to this day, active Manson Family members. There are young fools who worship Manson and openly admit they would follow and obey this crazy man if given the chance. I think in the history of the United States, the Manson Family crimes are among the most frightening. There are many who say that our society created Manson. As a child he was abused, ignored, neglected. But many children suffer the same horrible childhood and don't grow up to become the mastermind of such horribly crimes.

Susan Atkins, was the one who got all of them arrested. She was so proud of what they had done, she couldn't keep her mouth shut while in prison on another charge and talked about the crimes. She was PROUD of what they did. She wanted to go "home" to die from the cancer that was destroying her body? Did her family pay for her chemo therapy or other cancer treatments? Nope. The tax payers did. I have a problem with that. I don't believe that we should let prisoners suffer from painful conditions, but I don't believe they should be treated for things like cancer either. Make them comfortable with pain meds and let the disease run its course.

I have often wondered about Leslie VanHouten. My mother's maiden name was VanHouten and she had a brother who during a first failed marriage had children that he didn't see after the divorce and his remarriage. I've done some research but was never able to find out whether or not that was one of his children. No, I haven't spoken to that Uncle in years, he wouldn't admit it anyway, but yes the Leslie's age would be about correct. Just some potential scary family history for me I guess.

DS, you talk about there being a "painless" way for a convicted felon to be put to death. The "claim" that lethal injection is painful is based on various things that are measured during the injection, such as heart rate. There are, logically, many explanations for the "test results" besides it being painful. Lethal injection is, to date, the least painful way for someone to die. Any pain that maybe felt is minimal and short lived. I'm sure there is a lot going on in the mind of the person being put to death stapped down to the table waiting for the fluids that will kill him.

The death penalty is not given lightly. There must be extreme mitagating circumstances to even request the death penalty as punishment. Even when the death penalty is given, there are automatic appeals that are done, detailed reviews of every single thing done during trial, going over the evidence with a fine tooth comb and the inmate's conviction is not carried out for quite a few years. The cost of the death penalty to the state (and therefore the taxpayers) is in the millions. On average it is more expensive to carry out the death penalty that to give life in prison. It is rare for the inmate to remain alive as long as Manson has.

That does not translate to me being against the death penalty. I am very much in favor of the death penalty and actually believe that the Manson Family's sentences should have been reinstituted when California brought the death penalty back.

Rule,

The concept that you have is appalling. When the time comes that we, as a society, will relish the idea of watching what amounts to nothing more than a snuff film of convicts fighting to the death, we will have completely lost our sense of humanity and the inmates will be running the asylum as the saying goes. There is not one redeeming quality to your idea.

As for domi's state of "At what point is justice served" the answer is "When the victims are no longer dead." It really is that simple. I believe in forgiveness. To forgive someone for the crimes they may have committed against your loved ones will improve your life because you will be able to not carry the burden of hatred all your life. But that doesn't equate to saying that once the person is forgiven they should not have to pay for their crimes.

There is no way that a commuted death penalty sentence, once turned into a life sentence should ever permit parole. It is sad that many "life" sentences do permit for parole. If you do something horrible enough to warrant a life sentence, you shouldn't be able to look through a window that doesn't have bars for the rest of your days. It really is that simple.

And to lazarus1983, as usual, it is with great delight to know the liklihood of you being a parent is slim. Parents are not always at fault nor have they failed if their children commit crimes or become a menace to society. If that were the case, just based on your posts that I have read, I would have to say that your parents failed miserably in the raising of you.




Rule -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 2:42:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady
I am very much in favor of the death penalty

Rule,

The concept that you have is appalling. When the time comes that we, as a society, will relish the idea of watching what amounts to nothing more than a snuff film of convicts fighting to the death, we will have completely lost our sense of humanity and the inmates will be running the asylum as the saying goes. There is not one redeeming quality to your idea.

As appalling as watching a boxing match? As appalling as watching episodes and movies in which humans, animals and plants die?

Did you lose your sense of humanity when watching war movies, westerns, detectives, episodes of NCIS, Running Man, Conan the Barbarian?

You bet that I will relish seeing a boy with a circumcised penis who murdered his sister, in a battle to the death. I would pay for the opportunity to witness that.




lobodomslavery -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 4:07:43 AM)

No im totally against life meaning life. All people even murderers are capable of redemption. I think they should be given a second chance after ten years in jail. The death penalty is a backward abomination. America needs to get real
kevin




sirsholly -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 4:36:43 AM)

quote:

One first needs to determine whether prison's primary objective is to punish or rehabilitate. If it's to rehabilitate, then one also needs to determine if Van Houten has been rehabilitated.
Fuck the rehabilitation. In a case such as this prison works to keep her away from society.




sirsholly -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 4:39:57 AM)

quote:

One of them has already died in prison. I can't remember which one of them it was, but she had terminal cancer, and they wouldn't even release her to die at home.
I am willing to bet she was loaded on pain medication when she died.

Gee....thats nice....




sirsholly -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 4:44:57 AM)

quote:

Other than that, this is why I'm for the death penalty. I think it is far more inhumane to keep a person in prison for the entirety of their life. However, I think that when the death sentence is carried out, it should be done in the most humane way possible. There has been some question as to whether or not lethal injection causes pain. I don't see why they can't come up with a combination of drugs for lethal injection that won't be painful. Something that just puts a person to sleep.
Multiple stab wounds in the abdomen would have put her to sleep. She deserves nothing better than what she did to her victims




heartcream -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 4:45:38 AM)

I am sure there are people in prison who dont belong there and there are people out in the world that dont belong there either.

This girl was 19, I dont know where her mind and heart were at at the time but I dunno 41 years in prison I doubt the chick is harmful, I dont know but I doubt it. The prison system is what it is and hopefully we as a people can get our shit together a little better than the systems we have in place now. We have a tendency to be barbaric and unconscious and not even realize it. A quick trip down through history proves this over and over again.

We can design and build and do all sorts of crazy stuff let us figure out our penal system a bit better too!




sirsholly -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 5:01:07 AM)

quote:

This girl was 19, I dont know where her mind and heart were at at the time but I dunno 41 years in prison I doubt the chick is harmful, I dont know but I doubt it. The prison system is what it is and hopefully we as a people can get our shit together a little better than the systems we have in place now. We have a tendency to be barbaric and unconscious and not even realize it.


She was barbaric and fully realized it, even at 19 yrs old.

No sympathy.




lobodomslavery -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 8:06:34 AM)

im sorry but two wrongs dont make a right. If thats the case why dont we cut people up who cut up or dismember others. If you hit your child then its ok for them to smack you back. I dont think thats acceptable at all. Society must have rules and punishment but not barbarism. Murderers should not be stabbed, beaten, tortured or anything else. They should merely be jailed and have their freedom taken away. That is punishment enough. Some states in the US disagree. But some States in the US are totally fucked up
kevin




heartcream -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 10:41:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly


She was barbaric and fully realized it, even at 19 yrs old.

No sympathy.



Yes it appears she was. I dont know the whole story. I do feel some sympathy, not sure why but I do.

Maybe it is unwarranted and she is to the core a psycho. I dont know.




lazarus1983 -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 5:06:13 PM)

LafayetteLady, you're damn right I'd make a terrible parent, which is why it's my responsibility NOT to have kids. If you're not in a position to have and raise kids, then you shouldn't be having them. Bad parents blame everything and everybody but themselves.




monochromaniac -> RE: Should Life in prison, really mean Life in prison? Van Houten (7/8/2010 5:17:16 PM)

I don't quite understand how her being 19 at the time of her commiting the crimes would mean she could get off more easily.

She was an adult. A young one, but an adult. I'm 18 and I'm pretty sure that if I were to commit a crime as vile as she did, it would be down to me being a purely evil human, rather than any bull about getting led astray or not being fully aware of the consequences of my choices.

And, just wondering - what do you guys think the purpose of prison is? I see it as a punishment for crime, but it seems that some see it as just a way to keep the criminal away from society as long as they are considered a danger to it.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125