|
Ligeia72 -> RE: Preferences based on aesthetics (6/30/2010 1:41:21 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LanceHughes quote:
ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage it's all about the looks, baby! Tell me something different, and I'll show you a liar! Maybe for you, my DarlingS. For me it's attitude, attitude, attitude. You say, "Yes, Sir," and hold yuor arms behind your back and we're off to the races. Some men in the Men-Only play group (gay,straight, bi-curious, hetroflexible, and more) are confused when I approach them. "Me, Sir? There's better looking here, Sir" Answer: "I like your attitude and what you were saying in the social room earlier. And, boy, do I have to remind you that I said 'Get over here'? I wasn't asking!" YEP! That always works well. Now, if the attitude is wrapped in a nice package, well, then no argument from me. LOL! Thanks for posting this, I must admit I did wonder if it was a bit of a D/s vs S&M thing - as in someone into S&M would be more likely to place emphasis on aesthetics as opposed to someone more into the D/s side of things (speaking in generalisations of course) Personally I'm only interested in attitude so far as it is pleasing to the bottom to do so. If doing the whole, 'Yes Mistress' thing is what triggers someone's particular aspect of pleasure/get's them off, then I'm happy enough to indulge that. Otherwise it's not something I find necessary, or even appealing. I do find it ever so slightly fascinating as well that people can be on such opposite spectrums and still be considered to be involved in this melting pot of stuff we do called BDSM. Ok, that was awkwardly phrased. *lol* I do love the variety of interests, experiences, attitudes, types of play within the context of BDSM. Even if it's stuff I'm not into myself, I still enjoy reading others thoughts, opinions, ideas etc. [:)]
|
|
|
|