Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
We've posed for a LOT of pictures. Well, more accurate would be to say that beth's posed for a LOT of pictures and I've managed to be included in some. I would love to have a "session" videotaped and photographed; but the problem with that is the same one that occurs when you 'plan' to record most things where the energy, sexuality, and sensuality you are seeking is a factor of spontaneity'. It is impossible to plan spontaneity. The best way to be disappointed about any erotic, sensual, encounter is to plan it; planning to film it - makes it even more difficult. At least from my perspective as an 'amateur', and appreciating those exceptions I've seen in the 'adult film' world where the actors give the impression of actually enjoying each other. As a result - most of our pictures, self taken and by others, have been 'after the fact' poses. On a few occasions, I've managed to capture beth's expression in the middle of a debauchery induced 'cathartic' haze - but usually I share that same mental and emotional state and finding a camera is not on my mind. There have been times when we've wished we had a stand-by photographic documentary 'slave'. Then again - there is the argument that the mere fact of having a photographer present disables the ability to capture the desired images of the session. To date - there was one exception. Darcy and .thedark captured some AMAZING erotic, sensual, sexy, and FUN, images when we posed for them. We could have easily gotten 'carried away' and they could have both clicked away. Who knows what would have happened if, on the day of our photo session, time constraints weren't a factor. We still have a desire and hope someday to have the opportunity, but I'd go into it with low expectations. For one thing - being 'directed' equates to being 'dominated' and it would be play on my mind. Maybe a three remote controlled camera shoot down in our little dungeon or, even better, outside by the pool using the 'bird-feeder' support, would be better.
|