Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Water powered cars


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Water powered cars Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Water powered cars - 1/10/2010 10:37:11 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Well folks they're here. Actually hydrogen powered engines have existed for some time now, and there have been many experimental vehicles over the years. .

What has happeneed is that fuel cell technology has caught up to the demand. No longer needs there be a tank of hydrogen in every car big enough to blow Ney York off the face of the Earth. From what I understand it is more like an on demand system. Yes it keeps a reserve, but in aviation terms it could be said that the weight of the fuselage is greatly reduced.

This is becoming attractive as an alternative to the normal fight for oil. Big oil can't keep this technology down for long. But strangely Google will find you very few good hits if you search for this. Just a coincidence of course.

At any rate I am not so much here to instigate a debate (I think) but to see if anyone knows the base metals, ELEMENTS that are required for these fuel cells. I can play with ten ot twenty grand if the payoff is right. There has to be some sort of rare metal involved, if anyone knows what it is, and the guy who developed the technology doesn't disappear I would say certain metals will skyrocket once the word reallly gets out, if it does.

I don't think they are doing this with twenty mule team BORAX.

The guy who got it going I think is in Japan. But to sell the product here it is best he get a US patent right ? Well maybe. A US patent is a matter of public record, and if you apply for a patent you usually do it through a patent attorney who does a patent search, and look for what is called prior art. Once the base procees patent is applied for in this country, the secret is known. The idea of a patent is to keep others from using your secret, but how can they do that without knowing your secret ?

There is very little in the way of hard, nuts and bolts information on this right now, at least according to a Google search. Among a few important things, I've not seen much in the way of information on how long these fuel cells last and what it takes to replenish or replace them. I don't think this technology can be kept down for long. Fwr be it from me to advocate or engage in speculation, but dammit I want my piece of the pie. I am sick of working. I'm not the Hunt brothers, but if others can do it, why shouldn't I ?

There has to be some sort of salt involved, and I don't mean your run of the mill sodium chloride. Money has been made by people sitting on their ass at home on things like this. It may be my turn to take a ride on a bubble. Or, if such an opportunity doesn't exist because the materials needed are common in nature, I could probably come up with a good plan to convert cars to burn water right ? There are already people selling kits, but I don't know if they use this new technology yet.

I haven't looked into it a hell of a lot so far, but I know enough to know what these kits must do. Something must be done with the fuel injectors because the additives in the gas will no longer be there to lubricate.  A would doubt they are liquefying the hydrogen as well, that would cost enough energy to make it a big nosebleed. So we are talking about a serious revamp of the whole fuel system. My guys can handle it and I got machines to make the parts. If I can learn enough to build just one and maybe just break even, then I can build another, and so on and so on. Each time it gets easier which equals cheaper.

I know we all bitch about cheap shit, but that is in essence the job of any engineer, to get the job done and leave room for profit.

My whole family almost is car people. My Father built a Chevy 283 that would run comfortably at 9,000 RPM. One car got passed around the family a bit needed extra members welded in, because it kept ripping the bolts for the seat right out of the floor. Before his health went, we kept up on the newer technology and have never been at the mercy of a mechanic. We melded his superior knowledge on the subject with my superior knowledge of electronics to fully understand how a computer controls most newer car engines. We have out diagnosed Mr. Goodwrench more than once. In one such instance the shop said change the engine, after careful consideration I said "Tear down for timing chain". The retort was that the book said the car did not have a timing chain it used gears. I said "I said what I said" and what did he find ? A timing chain with a FUBARed tensioner. Dammit I can tell when the valve timing was off, and it was. So they got a couple more years out of that car. It would still be running today except for one thing - they let teenagers drive it. Nuff said.

Partly it is money, but I also want to get my mind into something other than pure electronics. Truthfully, modern electronics is begging to outstrip my ability to understand it. But electronics and mechanics are used together in many things, expensive things. Thus I see a possibility of opportunity here. Everybody needs a car or something to drive almost. I know some don't drive, but many do. This makes for a large market pool. I smell money. I smell the kind of money one can make and possibly retire on, without cheating anyone. And if I can't I can just invest in what others need to get it done. One way or another they can't keep a lid on this forever.

Before anyone mentions those tinfoil hats, I know what I am talking about. I have known that this is possible for a long time. What I am relaying here is that there has just been a discovery that makes it more feasible and economical. Momma didn't raise any dummies.

Just like the perpetual generator I mentioned a while back. It took me a while to figure out how it works, and really that sort of took all the "magic" out of it. However I don't know enough about that technology to do anything of note with it. In this particular field I think I do.

And if the stress is now to "go green" this is poised to change the face of the world a bit. Big oil loses it's teeth. When you burn gas optimally the byproduct is nothing but water vapor and CO2. When you burn hydrogen at stoichometry, the byproduct is water vapor.

With what I know I can see where this is leading. Eventually instead of adapting engines to run on hydrogen, some will be designed to run on it in the first place. The next goal would be to make the system more adibiatic, then we are approaching absolute zero when it comes to environmental impact. I can almost smell the money now. ( actually that in itself might be an environmental impact )

But then I am still not going to throw money away on something that may be a pipe dream ( literally ).

Whaddya think ?

T
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Water powered cars - 1/10/2010 11:37:34 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
I think hydrogen fuel cells are the future, and that battery powered electric cars are a ridiculous dead end. Not only because of the problems of electric power from batteries but also because this technology appears utterly unable to power trucks such as our society and economy relies on, whilst I can certainly see hydrogen systems doing so.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Water powered cars - 1/10/2010 11:52:40 AM   
MasterG2kTR


Posts: 6677
Joined: 8/7/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline
I embrace the concept myself. I truly believe hydrogen power is the future for cars. While I have an understanding of the basics, I don't know enough about it overall to help. However, I have seen news and videos that this already exists to a lesser degree in northern europe, somewhere in Sweden, Netherlands, Norway.....somewhere around there. They actually have "filling" stations and production cars, albeit small numbers.

The basic technology has been around since the 70's, but big oil has always kept it hush anytime someone came forward to shine a light on this technology. You can be sure that once it becomes feasible big oil will buy into it heavily so they can keep their death grip on the consumers of the world.

Termy, if you can come up with something that truly takes you in the right direction, let me know. I'll buy into it as well, because like I said, this is the real future. Ethanol is a massive joke and must die soon. Electric has good possibilities but needs a huge breakthrough in recharge technology and battery life.

In a more short term solution, I conceived of a hybrid far more practical than the current generation that exists (though I admit my ideas may have unseen flaws). Current hybrids use gas engines at low speeds and electric kicks in once the vehicle reaches a steady cruising speed. Right there is the problem, gas engines use huge amounts fuel getting up to speed than they do once they are at cruising speed. My concept is this. Reverse the process. Electric motors are much more practical to get a car up to speed since they have instantaneous torque available. From a stop use the electric motor to accelerate. Once the vehicle is at cruising speed let the gas engine take over. Much smaller engines would be needed to maintain speed, thus more fuel efficient. Much more so than the current hybrids.

The downside would be stop and go city driving. However, if an option to keep the engine running during such times were incorporated, it could be used to run a generator/alternator to charge the batteries (this was also the plan at cruising speeds) constantly which would increase the potential range of the electric motors and reduce the need for (recharge) power from the public grid.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Water powered cars - 1/10/2010 11:54:17 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
T, Honda's got a couple of experimental cars running on this. http://dreams.honda.com/alternative-energy/?ef_id=1097:3:s_afec041cb07a8df942b927c3123ab726_3338498278:S0owFNBkLAoAAE4lzMoAAALA:20100110195252

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Water powered cars - 1/10/2010 12:15:22 PM   
asyouwish72


Posts: 69
Joined: 11/2/2004
Status: offline
"Water powered cars" is a terribly misleading heading. You will never, ever be able to fill a car up with water and expect anything to happen (other than rust). Fuel-cell powered vehicles will actually run on hydrogen and oxygen, the former of which will be obtained via hydrolysis of water (the later, happily, is abundant in the atmosphere). Since this is an energetically costly process, it's not likely to take off any time in the foreseeable future. Outside or organizations like NASA, hydrogen fuel cells have gotten very little traction, despite the technology being nearly half a century old. Fuel cells that strip hydrogen off of natural gas have proven a bit more commercially viable (they are still the very definition of a 'niche' product), but still have the same environmental consequences and fuel constraints as do fossil fuel engines.

Fuel-cell vehicles, incidentally, will almost certainly be indistinguishable in design from the hybrid-electrics now entering the market. Fuel cells are not motors. They don't work that way- they are simply a chemically-based electric generator. So "fuel cell cars", if and when they ever arrive, will pretty much just be a Volt with the gasoline engine swapped for a cell.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Water powered cars - 1/10/2010 12:49:52 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
AYW72 - I confess to lacking the mechanical/ chemical/ engineering knowledge that would allow me to participate fully on the subject.

My point really is that if we are to replace oil based fuel systems for vehicles, we must absolutely also consider that the replacement technology must be capable of powering trucks with a GTW of around 40 tonnes, including around 25 tonnes of cargo. Our economies depend on such vehicles because regardless of the current fashion, in Europe at least, of moving toward railfreight solutions, sooner or later the cargo has to go on a truck. Lower payloads means more trucks and more cost, not to mention more congestion, so the replacement has to be at least as good as the diesel powered trucks we have now - and I do not see battery powered vehicles coming anywhere near as good. 

The question really is whether we can best match diesel powered trucks with battery or hydrogen fuel cell.

Overall, the entire subject (going off topic a little) as regards man made CO2 emissions, depends on whether we can produce the requisite source electrical power without resorting to fossil fuels. Seems a bit silly to hamstring our transport system to go green if we then have to burn much more coal to generate power to ultimately make our vehicles run - notwithstanding the strategic advantages of not being reliant on overseas powers who control our supply of oil.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to asyouwish72)
Profile   Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Water powered cars Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063