Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze - 1/9/2010 1:28:06 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

No, heat is produced as the by-product of running an electric motor too, not sure how that heat is currently utilised but it could be. There is not a mechanical device so efficient that it doesn't produce heat as a by-product.


But there's an enormous difference between the amount of heat produced by an electric motor and an internal combustion engine. The inside of a gasoline engine produces temperatures in excess of 2,000 degrees F, heat so intense it would destroy the engine within a minute or two if the heat weren't carried away by a highly efficient liquid cooling system. A small fraction of that heat is diverted to warm the interior of the car. An electric motor doesn't produce waste heat on anywhere near that scale.



quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3
A petrol engine has a fuel source just like an electric one has a fuel source, what is the difference? The difference is one engine produces so much heat that it needs to be artificially cooled with fans.


Yes. And the other doesn't!



quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3
Whilst you are running your engine to warm up your car you are still using fuel, are you using more or less fuel than a battery powering a heated coil of wire with a fan? Debatable.


Debatable only if we can agree on what we're talking about, which I don't think we have established yet. Right now I think we're just talking past each other.

Let's try this. Let's get away from talking about "fuel," and use the term energy. A kilogram of diesel fuel contains about 18,000 BTU of energy. A kilogram of the most advanced electric car battery, fully charged, holds about 375 BTU (measured in watt-hours and converted.) Almost all of the diesel fuel's energy is converted to heat, which must be eliminated as quickly and efficiently as possible to keep it from destroying the engine. An electric motor is, by its very nature, designed to convert as much of its stored energy as possible into kinetic energy. I don't have the percentages, because I'm doing this partly by memory and using a hand calculator for the math, but I'm quite confident asserting that the amount of energy wasted as heat by an electric motor is a fraction of a percentage of what is produced and wasted by an internal combustion engine.

There's just no way at all that the waste heat of an electric car motor could warm a car in this climate. None. Some of the stored energy would have to be diverted to keep the passenger compartment warm.




_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze - 1/9/2010 3:43:59 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
This is all beside the point, the reality is if the car can be run with an electric heater and have comparable mileage to a petrol car then nobody cares and I assume manufacturers provide a power source to achieve that and efficiency savings are made in areas where a petrol engine can't i.e. to maximise the utilisation of that power source. To compare two different engines that use two different sources of energy with no ability to quantify how much of that energy is used for each part of the process, such as environmental heating, is pointless.

For example can anyone certify that an electric heater uses more energy than the fan used to cool your petrol engine? or the starter motor used to fire it up, the fuel pump, the coolant system or all the other electrical systems used to control it? These are just items where we can compare like for like in terms of electrical power. Then you have to consider the other parts of your petrol engine where wasted energy occurs unlike in a electric car. If your car produces too much heat then that is waste it means the fuel you put in it is being used to achieve something you don't care about.

The question is: if you accept the fact a hot inefficient engine has the positive effect of heating the car can the efficiency saving of an electric motor allow you to use some of that energy you save to heat the car? In other words are you heating the car and controlling the energy required to heat the car in a finite way or are you just switching the hot air from the engine from inside the car to the outside external environment via valves?

< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 1/9/2010 4:14:17 PM >


_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze - 1/9/2010 4:45:45 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
I think we're still talking past each other. The point I'm making is that using electricity to heat the interior of a vehicle when it's below zero fahrenheit requires such an enormous battery capacity, you can not possibly carry - in a mid-sized passenger car - a battery large enough to both propel the vehicle for 250 miles, and heat it for 5 hours. You just can't come close to it with current technology. Using electricity to create heat is just too inefficient. Therefore, an electric vehicle is of no use to me. I'd have to own 2 cars. I'm not arguing any of the other merits or detriments of either technology; I'm just saying that in my climate, that one factor alone makes a completely electric car useless to me. I accept and agree with your fundamental position about the benefits of using alternative fuels for transportation, but at the end of the day, a gallon of gas or a gallon of diesel just carries many times more usable energy than a battery of similar weight and volume.

I have to wonder, though, about the feasibility of using a secondary source for heat - I'm sure it would be possible, in terms of both technology and safety, to engineer some sort of supplementary heater that was fueled by a small tank of natural gas. Sure, the natural gas would still be putting some pollutants into the air, but the "green" advantage of an electric vehicle is so great that it would almost certainly more than offset the infinitesimal amount of fossil fuel that the heater would use. I don't know a lot about electric cars, but I would assume that if someone is not already doing this, they will be soon.

And by the way - anyone who reads my previous post and notices an error in my figures; you're right. It just hit me a few minutes ago, too late to edit. A kilogram of diesel fuel does not store approximately 18,000 BTUs of energy; it's closer to 38,000. I did a lot of the math in my head, and when i mentally divided what I believe to be the approximate weight of a gallon of diesel by kilograms, i divided by pounds instead. Stupid. Sorry about that.

< Message edited by ThatDamnedPanda -- 1/9/2010 4:47:38 PM >


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze - 1/9/2010 9:41:03 PM   
numuncular


Posts: 183
Joined: 2/14/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

This is a question that came to me owing to the current unusually cold weather we're experiencing in the UK. Maybe someone who knows might be able to comment?

It occurred to me that when I go out to start my petrol car in this weather, it can generate enough power to defrost my windscreen and rear screen and drive fans and warm the interior, and light the headlamps, power a radio and keep my cellphone charged, and still go 0-60 in about 8 seconds (ice permitting) and travel approx 500 miles on one tank of fuel doing all of this.

Can an electric car do the same? If it cant, then how on Earth do we expect to be able to cope with such vehicles?

E




theres no reason a hydrogen fuelled electric car couldnt do that without a problem, a battery car could still do it, however in very cold temperatures I dont think they keep their charge well at all (in the coldest parts of the world you cant use a mobile phone outdoors for the same reason) but theres really no reason they wouldnt work, the international space station does far more simply on solar generated electricity.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze - 1/10/2010 1:07:45 AM   
shallowdeep


Posts: 343
Joined: 9/1/2006
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen
It occurred to me that when I go out to start my petrol car in this weather, it can generate enough power to defrost my windscreen and rear screen and drive fans and warm the interior, and light the headlamps, power a radio and keep my cellphone charged, and still go 0-60 in about 8 seconds (ice permitting) and travel approx 500 miles on one tank of fuel doing all of this.

Can an electric car do the same?

Well, there are really two separate questions you are asking. The first deals with power: Can an electric car's batteries power a heater, a motor, headlights, etc. simultaneously? Yes, this is not an issue.

The next question deals with energy: Can said car travel 500 miles on a single charge? The current answer is no, but that has little to do with the weather.

As has been pointed out, chemical fuels have a far greater energy density than batteries. As a result, battery powered cars have a more limited range despite their increased efficiency. But passenger heating, even in very cold climates, really doesn't add that much to the energy requirements. A mid-size car in the US is defined as having a maximum interior volume of 3397 L. Using a volumetric specific heat capacity for air of 20.8 J/mol-K, and assuming a relatively large interior/exterior temperature differential of 50ºC (90ºF), you'd need about 158 kJ to heat the interior. That amounts to only 0.08% of the capacity of a presently realizable 53 kWh, 450 kg battery pack like that found in the Tesla. I don't have numbers for the heat flux typical from a car, but – even assuming you had to fully reheat that entire volume every minute – you'd still only use 24% battery capacity over a five-hour trip. Utilizing a heat pump rather than a resistive heating element could cut that by a factor of 2 or more.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
The point I'm making is that using electricity to heat the interior of a vehicle when it's below zero fahrenheit requires such an enormous battery capacity, you can not possibly carry - in a mid-sized passenger car - a battery large enough to both propel the vehicle for 250 miles, and heat it for 5 hours. You just can't come close to it with current technology. Using electricity to create heat is just too inefficient.

Chemical fuels obviously do pack more energy, but – even when harnessing a small fraction of the heat for warmth – the vast majority of that energy is still dumped as waste heat. Even at -30ºF, the difficulty lies less in keeping things from freezing than in preventing them from cooking. The amount of energy required to keep things warm isn't nearly as large as you are assuming. Therefore, while an electric vehicle would see some losses in cold weather that a combustion driven vehicle would not, the effect is more like running air conditioning in hot weather; it's not an insurmountable energy drain... unless I messed up my calculations, of course. :)

From the user perspective, an all electrical system actually has a nice advantage - you can heat things up quickly, and with no need to wait for the car to warm up first. The Tesla's batteries could, for example, deliver enough power to heat a car from -30ºF to +70ºF in less than a second after pressing the ignition. In practice you'd probably slow that process down a bit to avoid melting the heating elements, but you'd still get lots of hot air coming out of the vents instantly, something I imagine would be welcomed by most people on a frigid morning.

Still, independent of climate control, the range of battery powered cars remains an issue. A couple hundred miles is presently expensive, but doable; much more and the batteries start to weigh (and cost) too much. Perhaps worse, there is no way to quickly "refuel" – few people have the patience to wait a few hours to recharge in the middle of a trip. Especially if it's cold. For commutes electric cars are nice, but they lack the flexibility to take longer trips – a limitation which greatly hinders the appeal. Hybrids are more popular for a reason.

Extremely low operating temperatures can be an issue for batteries, since the chemical reactions are slowed. You would probably need to add heating elements around the battery pack to charge at -30ºF (not a big deal since it's already plugged-in) and might also have to divert some energy to those elements while in operation.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze - 1/10/2010 6:12:44 AM   
Shiroka


Posts: 51
Joined: 11/25/2008
Status: offline
Chances are if I had an elderly relative but off due to snow, Id also have several of their neighbors telephone numbers I could call since I  know they may be closer than I am to check on them.

It would be kind of hard to drive over 400 miles to check on them,

I was cut off last year sue to snow but someone I knew who is close to family was able to remedy that one.


(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze - 1/10/2010 10:34:49 AM   
DomImus


Posts: 2004
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
When the weather is not suitable for driving...
Don't drive.


Or if your poor weather driving skills are inadequate, stay home. I wish more drivers could understand and heed this one. We've been dealing with an arctic cold wave here in the south the past several days. The roads were not nearly as bad overall as the local media reported, at least not later into the first day. That morning and the night before - yes, things were touchy. By the next afternoon things were in decent shape but a small contingent of folks who should have just stayed home were out driving like the entire state was a sheet of black ice - holding everyone else up on essentially dry or just wet roads. I let my displeasure with these folks be known several times in no uncertain terms.


_____________________________

"Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable." Sidney J. harris

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 27
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: electric cars & the deepfreeze Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.172