RE: Mistress Zariah (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

stef -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 9:46:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: McWhips

I thought she was looking for a true sub or whatever until I read this and realized shes looking for clients.  Why didnt she say shes having trouble looking for true clients?

I realize that you get propelled into an instant lather over the topic of pro doms, but it is possible that she's looking for a personal sub and not clients.  I know many pros who also have personal property.

~stef



tasha_tart -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 9:48:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

According to your profile, you're looking for an online ldr with a cuck? How does one cuck ld, over the internet?

And you want the "real sub/slave" to pay you for the privilege of never meeting you irl, or having any play time with you irl?

My question to you is...Are you a "Real Domme"? or just a player, who wouldn't know what to do in real life?

I'll be awaiting her answer to that, though I won't be holding my breath.
 
Tasha



McWhips -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 9:54:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: McWhips

I thought she was looking for a true sub or whatever until I read this and realized shes looking for clients.  Why didnt she say shes having trouble looking for true clients?

I realize that you get propelled into an instant lather over the topic of pro doms, but it is possible that she's looking for a personal sub and not clients.  I know many pros who also have personal property.

~stef


No different from the sentiments of others here such as subrob who said:    "And you want the "real sub/slave" to pay you for the privilege of never meeting you irl, or having any play time with you irl?"



tasha_tart -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 10:01:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: McWhips

I thought she was looking for a true sub or whatever until I read this and realized shes looking for clients.  Why didnt she say shes having trouble looking for true clients?

I realize that you get propelled into an instant lather over the topic of pro doms, but it is possible that she's looking for a personal sub and not clients.  I know many pros who also have personal property.

~stef


Having read the OP's profile, I'd have to agree with McWhips.  While it is possible she is looking for a personal sub, her profile does not read that way to me at all.
 
Asking for "longdistance contract slaves to train online" with spoiling her being one of the requirements, certainly sounds like the thinly-veiled pro-domme ad we are seeing more of on this site.  I could be wrong; maybe my reading comprehension has gone south.
 
As I've stated in previous posts on other threads, I have nothing against pro-dommes in general.  However, if one is looking for a pro-domme, there are any number of websites that cater to that search.
 
I'd wager that most (true?) subs are not at Collarme looking for a pro-domme, and especially not one who complains that all the "true" subs are gone.
 
Just my two cents worth.
 
Tasha



JohnWarren -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 10:15:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MysticalPhoenix

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren

What is also amusing is the semantic shift that seems to be taking place with the word "player."  Until the online crowd arrived, "player" used to mean "someone who is significant or has an impact."  I've seen this meaning used in worlds of intelligence gathering, police work, gambling and architecture.  "He's a player" for most offline people is a compliment.


Not for me, if I call someone a player offline, it's not a compliment, unless I'm referring to them as a major player in the industry (which can mean an individual or a corporate entity). 

But then in the black community, player has been use as a derogative slang term for a longer time .Back when I was in high school (over 20 years ago, but who's counting) there were two kinds of guys, nice guys and players.  And a player was someone who "played the field" (i.e. slept with as many girls as he could). 

No players for me.

Phoenix


That's interesting.  It may be the transition came via the blakspoitation films that were the rage with middle class white teens a while back. 



truesub4u -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 10:28:36 AM)

Lord not the "true" kick again.... LOL





jamesthehumanrug -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 11:44:34 AM)

DEAREST MISTRESS,
greetings,
can't meet,just anyone in-the -group ,and ,expect it to be the one for you when you are ,so unique and a rare-gift,to this world....,however,
more discouraging is the research ,of ,socrates and plato, who looked for the' honest- man'; dropping the wallet ;and found none,
and,killed the teacher ,with hemlock ,for
telling the truth,to innocent hearts....



upherass -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 12:30:53 PM)

slavejali

I based my reply on her post, the name of it, and her profile wanting 24/7 online.
She didn't get the attention she wanted from her profile, so she named a post after herself here, and tried here. To me, thats trolling.

I don't believe I have done that here, or in my profile, and am hurt by your remark.



chains314 -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 12:41:17 PM)

YES Ma'am this one is a true sub slave just wating for the opertunity to serve serving is my life



michaelGA -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 12:46:18 PM)

yes, we are out there, but some of us want something closer by and not long distance...been there, done that...got the t-shirt to prove it...LOL 



pushed4yourbeer -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 12:47:31 PM)

yeah! its there . I am a true sub or so I believe.But you are so far , how to convince you Madam?
pushed4yourbeer



chrisea623 -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 12:55:47 PM)

i have been told i am



SlaveColin -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 1:01:13 PM)

I've found that a lot of people here demand that you submit to them without first getting to know them. I think if I found someone who wanted me to submit that they'd at least understand that I would want to get to know them before handing over the keys to my life. In the same vein, a lot of people demand some sort of 'tribute' on the first contact with them. I wonder if these people are really dominant, or if they're just looking for free stuff and demand it before you get to know them so that they don't have to show any real dominance. To me, dominants should mold their submissives in ways that end up with the subs being someone they want to enjoy. Long term training with punishment and rewards is the way I see this happening.
Regards,
Sub C.



maybeican -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 1:09:09 PM)

There are a few of us Lady Zariah, but I must admit, darn few. It is a shame that the players make it so hard for those who truely believe and seek.



stef -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 1:28:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: McWhips

No different from the sentiments of others here such as subrob who said:    "And you want the "real sub/slave" to pay you for the privilege of never meeting you irl, or having any play time with you irl?"

He asked questions, you lept straight to conclusions.  A less than subtle difference.

Not that you're necessarily wrong, mind you.  I'm just giving her the benefit of the doubt until she responds (if she ever bothers.)

~stef



MichMasochist -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 1:40:59 PM)

From your add I would say Pro, right? Plenty true slaves but why should we pay you. Your only enterest is money and your motives are mercenary. So I ask were are all the true Dommes? All I keep finding are Pro girls.

And the only reason why I'm even replying is that I'm bored. Of course my definition of "true" most likely isn't the same as others on this board.

Hugs and Kisses
Mich



MichMasochist -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 1:52:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: McWhips

I thought she was looking for a true sub or whatever until I read this and realized shes looking for clients.  Why didnt she say shes having trouble looking for true clients?

I realize that you get propelled into an instant lather over the topic of pro doms, but it is possible that she's looking for a personal sub and not clients.  I know many pros who also have personal property.

~stef


You do? Can you name one? I can't, never heard of it, why would a pro give it away for free? Sounds bad for "the bussiness".

Her add reads very clear to me. She wants clients.

;)





MichMasochist -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 2:11:31 PM)

Here's a question, that I think is far more relevant. Can a pro domme ever actual be considerd to be a true, real, dominant? Sincerely not in my less than humble opinion. What are your thoughts on this?

I realize that "true" is a subjective term but if her motives are mercenary, in it for the money, that makes her something else and less than she claims to be.

It surprises me at the number of women who seem to think if they call themselves domme the slaves will cum. Misspelling intentional. :)

Hugs and Kisses
Mich



IronBear -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 2:12:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichMasochist


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: McWhips

I thought she was looking for a true sub or whatever until I read this and realized shes looking for clients.  Why didnt she say shes having trouble looking for true clients?

I realize that you get propelled into an instant lather over the topic of pro doms, but it is possible that she's looking for a personal sub and not clients.  I know many pros who also have personal property.

~stef


You do? Can you name one? I can't, never heard of it, why would a pro give it away for free? Sounds bad for "the bussiness".

Her add reads very clear to me. She wants clients.

;)





Such cynicism .....

One of my close friends is not only a pro Domme but she has a personal slave too. I know of others . It's just like half the whores I know who are also friends. they have Husbands, boyfriends,or life partners (of exther sex)(



stef -> RE: Mistress Zariah (3/22/2006 2:17:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichMasochist

You do? Can you name one?

I could name several but I'm not going to.  One of the draws for a pro is that their clients always have the thought in the back of their mind "maybe I can become their personal slave."  It's almost certainly never going to happen, but that thought tends to evaporate when there already is a personal slave in the picture.  It's just one of the things that drives repeat clients and I'm not going to throw a wrench into that machinery for anyone.

There are several pros that post off and on in the forums that have mentioned having both business and personal relationships.  You'll find them if you spend some time looking.  

quote:

I can't, never heard of it, why would a pro give it away for free? Sounds bad for "the bussiness".

If you've never heard if it, then it can't possibly be true, right?  You're making the mistake of confusing business interactions and personal life.

quote:

Her add reads very clear to me. She wants clients.

I'm sure she does.  It just might not be all that she wants.

~stef



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875