RE: lifestyle house (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


CallaFirestormBW -> RE: lifestyle house (1/4/2010 8:55:02 AM)

quote:

Someone brought up about grandchildren....most everyone lives in a vanilla world and keep this part of us private to most..would that mean if you lived there, you could not have anyone vanilla over that wasnt aware?


This is where communication comes into play in a gathering like this. We have had vanilla guests over all the time who have no idea about the alternative aspects of some of our members (though they often comment on how much like "old-timey fancy households" we are and how "romantic" it is)-- and we even have members of the household who are NOT involved in the fetish or authority-exchange aspects of our lifestyle. When such things matter, people talk to one another... "I'd like to invite my boss and his wife over for dinner -- we'd like to have a nice, quiet vanilla environment for the dinner party. Will Thursday work for everyone, or is there another night that is better?" We phrase things in a way that gives people the opportunity to provide input, but does not allow potentials for selfishness or greed to muck up the works. Note that the person inviting hir boss in the above example didn't say "Can you guys not be kinky for a night so that I can invite my boss over?"... instead, xhe said what xhe wanted to happen, what xhe needed to have it be successful, and asked for help in scheduling so that there would be minimal inconvenience to the other household members.

Communication, communication, communication. [;)]

Calla




vagabondduo -> RE: lifestyle house (1/4/2010 9:02:24 AM)

Liability may or may not be covered under a policy such as a bed and breakfast has.  First, you are not renting out rooms for a day or a week.  These are long term rentals so not covered under the same category as a bed and breakfast.  Bed and breakfast insurance will not apply if people are living there, cooking food, and washing clothing.   Second, if you know there is BDSM activity taking place on the premises then you are going to need something extra for protection.  For example, if you turn a basement or allow a tenant to turn a basement into a dungeon and someone gets hurt on the equipment then you are very likely liable for the injury.  The reason for this is that you would be knowingly allowing what is illegal activity in your boarding house. 

As to your cross dresser example, not all feel the need to cross dress in public.  Many can and do dress as they please in the privacy of their own homes or apartments.  You are at most giving them a place where they can dress in semi public within the confines of the boarding house. 

As a 58 year old woman, let me give you my point of view on your idea since I am in your selected age range.  As much as I enjoy being around others in the lifestyle, I have no desire to be around those people all the time.  I enjoy my vanilla friends.  Yes, I do know a very few people who only socialize within the BDSM community, however, they are very rare.  A communal way of living is something I might even enjoy some day.  I would only think of living like that if it were a place I could invite my family and vanilla friends to visit and have dinner without having to worry they might find another tenant offensive in some way (your cross dresser for example). 




CarrieO -> RE: lifestyle house (1/4/2010 9:39:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mrdpettigrew

the replys i got back were applicable to that situation . a few well thought out ones mentioned some on knocking on the door like grand kids or other. does that not occure now or could not neighbors hear .

You'll always have guests visiting.  Some could be aware and accepting of lifestyle choices...some not.  Would you be willing to have a space for these guests to visit their loved ones and friends?

the liability aspects are covered by the same insurance as a bed and breakfast would have to have .

I don't know about Canada, but in the states running a B&B carries a slightly different set of liabilities then renting rooms out in your home on a long term/monthly basis.

and although no one asked there would not be a dominant ladnlord or supper dom or waht ever it would be a house were idealy the sub side would be to its continuance not to a person. my eariler comment simpley stated we all need aplace to live houseing and we all need to eat .

Am I reading this correctly...you would like a person who identifies as a sub/slave to be willing to submit to the house in general?  Does that mean submissive to all?  Could you clarify please?

i do notrecall mentioning setting self up as supper dom . the example i gave was such as ageing crossdressers not as master slave so much


quote:


the problem i see with communes are they are leader run not housing for like minded not unlike a bed and breakfast


I would suggest you take a look at the website link I posted as you will find intentional communities can be quite different from your assumption.




DesFIP -> RE: lifestyle house (1/4/2010 4:02:38 PM)

I'm over 45 and do wiitwd, but I wouldn't want to do it with other people around. Sounds like you're looking for people to pay you to indulge your voyeurism and/or exhibitionism.

And older or not, doesn't mean I would be willing to play with just anyone if I were unpartnered.




mrdpettigrew -> RE: lifestyle house (1/5/2010 2:18:09 AM)

to be clear it is nopt about place for people to play so to speak it is a place for people of a like mind to live were they cna not be found offancive or have to hide from oterhs .. wonder how many people stayed in hotel room next to john wayne gacy and never knew it




ranja -> RE: lifestyle house (1/5/2010 2:51:06 AM)

There is a B&B in Florida somewhere where they cater for cross dressers... all the rooms and furniture are bigger, to make the men feel more feminine and there they have the option to get married as a bride to their wife... dress hire, make up and everything...
it saw this program on tv about it and it looked absolutely brilliant.

The problem with a commune is that if there are unsuspected guests calling you have to make sure that you do not unecessarily offend them... and i would think that is near impossible unless you turn all unplanned vivitors out and allow only for one total non- kink day a week to have all non kink visits done... or have the whole place so secluded that you can rely on a non-kink area to keep non-kink people.

i think it is a very tricky situation
because if someone is calling as a surprice with the grand childeren (who tend to want to explore a bit) and Dominatrix Susy enters the kitchen in full latex with her slave in thong on the lead crawling behind them to get some milk.... there might be an awkward moment.

Also what happens when people get so old they need home help? or medical care... meals on wheels... is there an upper age limit? a health check?

Insurance will most definitely be very difficult but very important to arrange.




mrdpettigrew -> RE: lifestyle house (1/6/2010 12:53:48 AM)

i imagine that those surprise visits would be the same no matter were one was to a greater degree and there are means of dealing with thew leval of the fetish. example not you casual cross dresser but the more so liffer type . that being iones who live it every day but have advanced in yours

liceanced as an inn i can rent to anyone i choose not a concenr for insurance and yes medical health would be a prime consideration it would not be a old folks home but a seniors residance




theRose4U -> RE: lifestyle house (1/6/2010 9:48:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

I don't know Canadian law, but in the US, it would be illegal to put in an age requirement (unless it's specified to be over 55 and there are other considerations to be made).  Also, having a lifestyle requirement per se would be illegal, but it would be pretty simple to have some fetish art readily visible to weed out those who are not lifestyle friendly.


I'm reading this as a potential kinky retirement home. While I'd be for an idea like that, I'm too young to meet the age requirement and wouldn't really want to be 80 or older and fading to the sound of someone elses whip in the next room.




vincentML -> RE: lifestyle house (1/7/2010 7:21:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mrdpettigrew

to be clear it is nopt about place for people to play so to speak it is a place for people of a like mind to live were they cna not be found offancive or have to hide from oterhs .. wonder how many people stayed in hotel room next to john wayne gacy and never knew it


When and where have communes worked? Sooner or later people renaige(sp?) on assigned chores. Sooner or later people in close proximity do not get along. I would not participate. I would rather be alone I think.




CallaFirestormBW -> RE: lifestyle house (1/7/2010 12:57:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


When and where have communes worked? Sooner or later people renaige(sp?) on assigned chores. Sooner or later people in close proximity do not get along. I would not participate. I would rather be alone I think.


To answer your question, I have over 2 decades of experience with communal and intentional-community situations, and I've found that -most- of them work, if not "forever" (a concept that I find fallacious to begin with, because who can promise what they have no control over, like time), then at least for long enough to be a positive experience in the lives of the members at the time -- especially when the members have a vested interest in the community as a whole.

You know, there are so many negative comments being thrown out on this thread -- fears and biases based more on lack of knowledge than on any experience, and that's problematic. I think that it's fine to say "Hey, I can't see myself doing that.", but there is, in my mind, a fine line between acknowledging that something isn't one's cup of tea, and trying to negate the entire concept because one doesn't "believe in it".

My offspring grew up being exposed to communal family, and now I am coming full-circle, and moving across country to join the intentional community started by my oldest offspring and his mate, who are in a communal household that has been growing for the past 5 years, and is now large enough, with members who have developed their own means of co-funding the community, so that they are ready to expand, get some land, and create a trust and land-trust for the commune. My youngest and his mate have decided to join the community as well, which is great, since he has a background in architecture and a strong desire to create communal living spaces that respect individuality while encouraging wise use of shared resources.

I'm sorry that the people you've been with have been so disappointing. Maybe you need to spend more time with people who are genuinely interested in building community -- they're an entirely different kettle of fish. For people genuinely interested in community, few renege on chores. They realize that the work they do supports not only the community as a whole, but themselves as individuals. They get a sense of satisfaction from it, and a sense of community well-being as well. Communities that thrive tend to rotate chores according to need and skill, so that people don't get bored or stuck with only onerous jobs over and over again, and make concessions to help out members who are burned out, tired, or sick. Healthy communities also have processes in place to deal with individuals who incite drama and cause problems beyond the capacity of the community to manage. Sometimes, that includes asking those members to please -leave-... but in over 20 years, I've seen that happen less than a dozen times.

You mention that, sooner or later, people living in close proximity won't get along, and I think that it is true that, in any group of people, there are going to be situations where people will get on each others last nerve -- which is why healthy communities also have a grievance process in place, so that these issues don't fester and do irreparable damage to the community. For example, my son's community, developed out of shared metaphysical interests (though multiple spiritual paths from Mystical Judaism to Atheism and back), has a Council of Arbiters, with 2 trained arbitrators in a community of less than a dozen people, and a plan to support the training of a new arbitrator for every 5 members, plus they have arrangements made for one of the mentors of their active arbitrators to be available as a neutral party. They feel that this will allow the community to always have someone who can arbitrate disagreements from a neutral viewpoint, and find a wise road to allow the community to thrive.

Healthy communities plan -- they plan to help to evoke the best in people, but also plan for options when things go belly-up. Healthy communities nourish the differences in their members, while reinforcing the communal bonds that they share. Even for a certified introvert like myself, a well-planned commune or intentional community can be a positive and affirming way to live... and as a side benefit, while living communally, I have more time for 'alone' activities that I cherish, like writing.

Calla




DesFIP -> RE: lifestyle house (1/7/2010 2:26:57 PM)

Calla, the only communal housing I know of here is a tract of land bought by a group who each live in individual houses. But the difficulties they've found is that if one needs to move, the others may not have the funds to buy him or her out. And as the community ages, all the chores necessary devolve upon the youngest members. Either that or they need to start paying for outsiders to do everything. And in this economy that's a problem.




vincentML -> RE: lifestyle house (1/7/2010 2:41:18 PM)

quote:

You know, there are so many negative comments being thrown out on this thread -- fears and biases based more on lack of knowledge than on any experience, and that's problematic. I think that it's fine to say "Hey, I can't see myself doing that.", but there is, in my mind, a fine line between acknowledging that something isn't one's cup of tea, and trying to negate the entire concept because one doesn't "believe in it".


My bad, Calla. Apologies.




rockspider -> RE: lifestyle house (1/7/2010 7:26:01 PM)

I got the property who could be used for that kind of things. I have even considered the OP's suggestion but discarded the idea. Just being a landlord with the normal kind of crap is bad enough. Besides i would never share the main house with strangers. If i should do that i would have to rearrange the house so it would be a private flatlet for me and a commune the rest. Some place i visited a while back had done that on a kind of bed and breakfast kind of arrangement for the socalled farm style getaways. I do have some selfcontained flats which is in another building. But really i prefer tenants who pays their rents and don't bug me more than necessary. Should they be BDSM people it doesn't mean the place should be turned in to a permanent munch place. For good reasons 2 out of 3 is standing empty at the moment, but i am expecting the bridge building to Germany starting very soon and then they should make an exellent bussines for at least the 7 years the building goes on. After all 15000 workers looking for accomodation in a scarce market is quite a nice position to be a landlord in.




mrdpettigrew -> RE: lifestyle house (1/8/2010 4:22:13 AM)

i can only express this waht i speak of is none differant then residance were tenants pay rent jsut catering to a particular kind of tenants . the y do not get chores same as any tenant does nmot get chores




Slaveforcontract -> RE: lifestyle house (1/20/2010 8:49:06 AM)


I believe that the concept has a great deal of merit and should not be dismissed out of hand. slavebitch




leadership527 -> RE: lifestyle house (1/22/2010 6:16:09 PM)

Honestly, I'd love to find others that shared, or even remotely shared, my "lifestyle". The issue seems to be that most people's version of the lifestyle varies quite a bit from each other. So I see no reason to think that my "lifestyle" and your "lifestyle" would in any way be compatible.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625