hardbodysub
Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005 Status: offline
|
Neither submission nor dominance is a gift, especially dominance. A gift is something of value given voluntarily without expectation of anything in return. D/s is transactional, not one-way. quote:
If I remember correctly, 'D's" are about 10% of the population; and, "S" folks are about 35%. Right there, you can see an imbalance of sorts. For a Domme, submissives are everywhere. Finding a worthy one is no doubt a chore. Thus, Dominance is the Gift! Whoa. The relative numbers of dominants and submissives clearly does not suggest that dominance is a gift to the submissive; if anything, the opposite is true. Even if you believe the numbers above, all it proves is a shortage of dominants. The result is that the "price" a submissive must pay for a dominant increases. That is quite the opposite of the concept of dominance as a gift. I can see how some might think that their submission is a gift, because they give it freely and *think* that they don't require anything from their partner. However, what they require as compensation is dominance from their partner. So it's not really a gift. The idea of dominance as a gift is totally off base, IMO. When have you ever heard of a dominant who required nothing of a submissive, and received no service, deference, or anything from the submissive? You haven't, because the absence of those things means there is no dominance. The presence of any of those things means that dominance is not a gift.
|