RE: How far can suspension of disbelief go and how do you get that far? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


ranja -> RE: How far can suspension of disbelief go and how do you get that far? (10/12/2009 4:50:25 AM)

it is sort of manipulative talking... the sort of talking a person needs to be good at if there is any hope of Dominating someone on-line




CaringandReal -> RE: How far can suspension of disbelif go and how do you get that far? (10/12/2009 5:11:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: i3ear

Alright, still a bit of confusion about what I am talking about here.

What I am saying is that, usually there is a safe word. Usually there is a safety net. Usually there is a higher level of control that the slave puts on the master for his or her own pleasure and safety. If there is not then it is not consensual and in my opinion very wrong.



Oh, no wonder what you said made little sense (I had a hell of a time trying to come up with the use cases). Your base assumption (safety net) is my absolute hard limit. You should have said: "Only people who use and believe in safe words should answer this thread!" But then of course you wouldn't have had had a very long thread if you had done so. :/

I've never, ever had a safeword (except as a silly joke, once a long time ago) and I won't have anything to do with anyone who insists upon one. 20 years later... (puts stethescope to heart) Still kicking. Gee, imagine that! Looks at body: still functions relatively well, subtracting points for age.

Hmm...I should be dead, maimed, injured, crippled after two decades of no safewords. I wonder what I did wrong? Maybe I can still do better? ;) What I did that was so terribly wrong, actually, was that I just insisted upon following my dream of a happy life,in which nonconsensuality plays a very, very big role.

------------------------------------------

Ok, I can address seriously the online part of your post. Yes that does require suspension of disbelief. Some people are better at doing that than others, just as some people like to read fiction and others hate it, or like some people get lost in a movie's story while others critically examine it for other things as they watch. The more unable to suspend a submissive is, the harder the time they have dealing with distance relationships. You see the varying attitudes on this expressed frequently on this messageboard, if you pay attention. I have a pretty good idea, from reading these boards, which of the regular submissive posters have an easy time suspending disbelief and which have a more difficult time with it.

I'm one of those who finds that suspension extremely easy to do. I don't like distance relationships, as I crave physical contact, but with the right person I also do not find them any less real (in power/control terms) than face-to-face relationships, as long as the dominant is basically realistic.




Andalusite -> RE: How far can suspension of disbelif go and how do you get that far? (10/12/2009 7:15:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: i3ear
What I am saying is that, usually there is a safe word. Usually there is a safety net. Usually there is a higher level of control that the slave puts on the master for his or her own pleasure and safety. If there is not then it is not consensual and in my opinion very wrong.

Even in 24/7 total  power transference, you still have to have moments where it just isn't sexual. ...These times the game is put on "light" and just casual equal ness happens, like in every good relationship.

But in the middle of a hardcore session, you have the suspension of disbelief. The disbelief in the game in the form of "yes this really is consensual and I do have some control over why I am here, and I have that safe word if I don't like anything"


On the relatively rare occasions when I have had problems, I haven't used a safeword. Either it wasn't needed, since it was something I could communicate in English (like I have to use the bathroom, or my hand is going numb), or I *couldn't* speak at all. When a strike hits that hard, I'm left gasping for breath and tend to freeze. Sometimes I'm so deeply in subspace that I can't say "red," or "no," or my own name coherently. So, I have communicated that to the people I've been involved with. I think safewords can be a useful tool, but they're more for the stage where you haven't figured out their body language yet, and for resistance play scenes where "no" and "stop" mean "more" and "harder." He frequently does things I dislike, that hurt in ways that aren't fun anymore, but I've consented to that. If I *wasn't* ok with that, I wouldn't have entered a M/s dynamic with him in the first place. I don't start and stop being his slave any more than I "step out of role" as his girlfriend - I'm both, all the time, even when we're not having sex or engaging in BDSM activities.




alittleevil -> RE: How far can suspension of disbelif go and how do you get that far? (10/12/2009 8:50:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: i3ear

Alright, still a bit of confusion about what I am talking about here.

What I am saying is that, usually there is a safe word. Usually there is a safety net. Usually there is a higher level of control that the slave puts on the master for his or her own pleasure and safety. If there is not then it is not consensual and in my opinion very wrong.


Hello,
And sometimes there is not a safe word.  Some of us do not put any level of control on the master for the sake of our own pleasure and safety, and frankly for some of us doing so would actually be not only un-pleasurable but unsafe.  Also, please, the use or lack of a safeword does not have anything to do with consent, whether you are talking about a SM scene or a more encompassing power dynamic.

quote:


What I am saying is the ability to shut out those facts in your mind, to get you to REALLY REALLY believe things like "s/he has total and complete control over my life" despite the fact that it really is just a (really really really) fun sex game.


I really really believe things like that already. Although here it isn't so much 24/7 active control as 24/7 active authority.  But, 24/7 active control can happen.  How do you get that? By taking it....

Even if you want to engage in a limited time span (say for a weekend) of 24/7 control as a "really really really fun sex game" you still have to actually take the control. And then, i guess, you give it back when the expiration date hits.

quote:

Even in 24/7 total  power transference, you still have to have moments where it just isn't sexual. People need time to recover between orgasms, and if a guy is hard for more than 4 hours then their boner literally breaks. :P These times the game is put on "light" and just casual equal ness happens, like in every good relationship.


There are many more moments of casualness in my life than there are moments of overt control that would be perceptible to others, or sex.  "Equal-ness", no, not so much-- obedience is simply expected no matter what we are doing:  shopping, playing cards, having supper, watching TV or fucking. In order to get  here, however, there were more of such moments--it's part of the process--and if need be he's plenty willing and able to go hardcore on my ass to keep me here.  Being rather fond of the skin of my ass, it is still not much of choice to make if you view obedience as my "choice." But, i'm a pretty biddable sort and i don't only obey for the sake of avoiding punishment. I like living like this, and while the things that make me best-suited to live like this were not choices, i did make the first choice to act on my self awareness and do so. (I guess you could still argue  how much of a real "choice" it is when the other option is misery: Master is not in any way pretending to want and expect me to obey and is active in his determination that i will, and if i were no longer willing to accept that, i could try to live differently, but then life would punish me.)

quote:


But in the middle of a hardcore session, you have the suspension of disbelief. The disbelief in the game in the form of "yes this really is consensual and I do have some control over why I am here, and I have that safe word if I don't like anything"

This is much harder to do in roleplay.


Seriously, safewords and their use and utility or lack thereof have a longer and much more complicated history than simply "when the other person doesn't like something."

There certainly is a suspension of disbelief required to simultaneously maintain some control and surrender all control and in my experience for some people it is simply not possible. The dissonance required is way too distracting. That's what makes it actually dangerous for some people. 

From a simple personal satisfaction perspective, if the feeling i seek is to feel surrendered, and i know i have an out, i cannot feel surrendered.

quote:


In short, how to REALLY REALLY REALLY lose your mind and give total and complete total control over someone willingly.


It takes two.  The other party has to REALLY REALLY take the total and complete control.  This sounds circular i guess, but it is the only way i can think of to make it work. I honestly have no idea how to do that in roleplay if i understand you to mean roleplay as "erotic chat"(which i am then taking to mean a rather limited time span in which to have it occur).  It takes time, consistency, quite a bit of intuition and knowledge of how people work, and determination.

Best,
aj




Fnyunj -> RE: How far can suspension of disbelif go and how do you get that far? (10/12/2009 9:43:16 AM)

quote:

In short, how to REALLY REALLY REALLY lose your mind and give total and complete total control over someone willingly.


I think maybe you're either underestimating, or even unaware, the degree to which we ALL construct our own realities, in our heads, based on a combination of our perceptions, and our experiences, and that which is most comforting to us.

(understanding that there are harsh realities in this world, for example: like starving children in other less-wealthy countries, that if we were to fully "live" in that reality - most of us would be simply overcome with guilt and despair - so we deny, we rationalize, we minimize. . . )

Delusion is a fact of life for probably most people. And I think that most slaves, REAL slaves, have remained slaves simply because it was easier to believe that "truth", than the alternative: they're really human beings with the right and the wherewithal to be free, if only they were willing to take the risk and put up the fight required to become and remain free (even if it meant death). Many people will choose to die for freedom. Many others would rather die than face an unpleasant truth. (example: pretty much ALL suicides).

It's a mechanism that all humans possess; and most use, all the time.

There are certain mindsets and views we all cling to; and this is probably where you're seeing, as an inability to maintain "suspension of disbelief".

So - you can massage things a bit, manipulate the situation. Make the desired fantasy more attractive than the alternative. Come to believe the fantasy yourself? Be a better actor? Maybe you don't believe in what you're doing - so you even tell yourself that you're telling "insane lies" - - well, how are you going to convince your partner to believe something you think is an insane lie? And consider this: your partner may actually be believing it, and you're doubting yourself, and projecting that doubt onto her. That's a possibility.

Maybe the roles, the story, the set, are too ambitious, too over-the-top? ("corny" is one thing that totally turns me off in a scene). Try for things that aren't bending reality too far, and those will be easier.

There's also a lot of science behind this - and you can do some reading to maybe get some ideas. For example, in hypnosis, there is a test that can be done to a subject, to test their susceptibility to suggestion. Scening has a great deal in common with hypnotic suggestion - different states of consciousness, etc. (in my opinion, what some call "sub-space" is actually a form of hypnotic trance). So, some people are actually much more susceptible to hypnosis than others. There's a rating scale of 1-10, and those who cling most fervently to their here-and-now, are the ones who can not be hypnotized at all. Maybe that's an issue of fear, and trust? The most suggestible people are a 10 on this scale, and if you ask them to forget that they were even hypnotized, they will not remember. But with how hypnosis works - they actually CHOOSE not to remember. The experience is there. The memory is there. The neural connections exist. But they will simply refuse to pull that memory of those experiences into their conscious awareness.

Another example of this is trauma victims. People who have been attacked, raped, or were in car accidents, or abused as children, they willingly dissociate from reality, and often will have no memory of the traumatic event. It's literally too emotionally painful. Their internal sense of safety and security wont let them re-experience that event.

So this is how emotions play a very strong role in how deeply we connect to our experiences. And these are the tools that can be used to nudge someone one direction or the other, towards accepting an alternate view of reality. (no, I'm not suggesting using traumatic shock to manipulate someone into a scene - I'm simply using it as an example).




allthatjaz -> RE: How far can suspension of disbelief go and how do you get that far? (10/13/2009 2:05:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja

It is all to do with your own power of imagination i think.

Some people watch movies and are constantly on the look out for mistakes, bad acting, or things that are out of place... other people watch the same movie and are totally into the story and enjoy it enormously.

edited for this:
allthatjaz said:  pictures that pop up on the right side of this site. A woman in a harness tied to a St Andrews Cross with a fem Domme astride her dressed all in rubber looks so staged that it does nothing for me

That is exactly what i mean... to me it does not matter at all that it is staged... the fact that people are so depraved that they have themselves pictured like that and put these pictures about for anyone to see is hot in my eyes... and i happen to like most of the images aswell and usually they turn me on.

Though i agree that the woman in the pretty dress might be ever so sexy aswell... real or not because that could be just as staged


Its all to do with context. When you sit down to watch a film you know your being told a story and so you indulge it.
Porn is great because you use your imagination combined with the images to create (in your own head) the scenarios that turn you on. The problem for me with the images presented here is they present a fantasy. Having experienced both that fantasy and what I consider very real D/s and S/m, the fantasies on here do absolutely nothing for me.
I know what its like behind the scenes in the studios that take these pictures. I have done the model bit where you sit around bored out of your mind before being tied to a Saint Andrews cross and being told 'try and look scared baby' and 'move your elbow slightly to the right or left'.

Ropes are another thing. I have to walk away from pretty knots and willing ropees because it bores me to death. A scene with a girl being dragged across the room, thrown to the floor and bondaged up whilst struggling to escape could be just as staged but for me is much closer to reality for me.

The suspension of disbelief here is my desire to see things as unconsensual.




xssve -> RE: How far can suspension of disbelief go and how do you get that far? (10/13/2009 6:37:32 AM)

I'm altogether too good at it I'm afraid, I have to occasionally remind people I don't really have any bodies buried in the backyard.

It is a fascinating subject, one that I wrestle with both in storytelling and in BDSM - the subject always arises w/respect to rape fantasies for instance, and a lot of people go to great lengths to avoid the appearance of negotiation for fear that will make it all seem squirrelly or something.

Me I figure if you're being tied up and flogged, it's real enough. Knowing that you can stop it at any moment, I think might actually increase your ability to to enjoy it since you're free to trip on the sensations, internal and external, it generates instead of thinking about how the hell you're going to get out of it, or worrying about whether the dom really is a psycho, which could either enhance or diminish the experience for you depending on the person.

i.e., subspace is a real enough psychological phenomena, doesn't matter if you get there by "playing" or otherwise, whereas on obsession with authenticity is actually a symptom of Narcissism, known as "the cult of authenticity".

That's the thing about role playing, everybody turns their noses up at the very idea, but in fact you can immerse yourself so deeply in a role that it ceases to be a role - what do you call that?

It's called "life".




ranja -> RE: How far can suspension of disbelief go and how do you get that far? (10/13/2009 8:39:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: allthatjaz

The problem for me with the images presented here is they present a fantasy. Having experienced both that fantasy and what I consider very real D/s and S/m, the fantasies on here do absolutely nothing for me.
I know what its like behind the scenes in the studios that take these pictures.

The suspension of disbelief here is my desire to see things as unconsensual.



I find the pictures here rather varied.. there are scared girls in cellars... or close ups of these mouth opening devises or rubber neck braces. There are pictures of girls being exhibited in public places or being fondled by a number of men whilst on her knees on the dinner table... There are the fancy dress pictures, corsets and pony play. Men in pain... electro stimulation things... there are so many different pictures and some are just brilliant.

I agree that a model in a bored mood might not enjoy the job and that might reflect in the picture... though a good fotographer might just ask the bored model to look another way so her empty stare does not ruin the photo... then again if her face shows that she really does not want to be tied to the cross, but she is there because she wants or needs the money... well that might come across as sexy too... i also know about taking pictures, it usually helps if people enjoy their work but even if they don't, you can work around that...

I like the fantasies as much as the supposedly non-consent things and as much as the things i experience myself... to me bdsm is as much fantasy as it is real and above all it should be fun and sexy... even the dark stuff...

i accept that tastes differ as you state in your last line




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625