pompeii
Posts: 934
Joined: 1/4/2007 From: Silicon Valley, San Jose, California Status: offline
|
Interesting. Being a guy, being logical, reasonable, and looking for a "real" person (not a spambot or chat buddy or pic collector, etc.) ... my experience dictates that the profiles become one-shot rather-useless initiation rites - yet not much more (YMMV). In fact, regarding the information in my profile itself, I never even look at my profile, written looong ago, and just left there, almost as simply as an initiation requirement for admission into the club. I don't even know what my profile says anymore - nor what age it's listing me. I've even almost given up on believing anything in anyone else's profile, mostly because 90-something percent of the "best" profiles are spam (probably closer to 100%), which certainly leaves a few profiles worth perusing who are local and "real". I'd wager, even though I'm in a kink-aware location of the planet, still perhaps, at most, there are from a dozen to a few score "real" profiles of people who would be interested in me and whom I'd be interested in. Of that few score, if you sort by "last on", fewer than a dozen typically will have logged in within the last year (according to my saved search criteria which is pretty general and broad, e.g., "female", "submissive or switch", looking for "dominant men", "under 150 pounds", etc.,. Notice that leaves me with always the same local hits (generally, unless someone newly logs in from the wild blue yonder) over and over and over and over again. Well, it doesn't take too long to respond to a dozen profiles at most, and, well, I've carried on just about that many conversations, so, at this point, who needs to read "their" profile either. (Albeit once in a while folks do post new intriguing pictures or comments which catch my eye - and I try to applaud them for that effort.) Mostly what I do for the dozen or so "profile hits" that have a reasonable chance of success, is I read the ladies' forum posts and journal entries. The good news there is that if they've recently logged in, then there's a better chanced they have forum posts and journal entries - so I base my assessment of them on three items: - Forum Posts - Journal Entries - Personal Email Responses Notice the profile information is the least meaningful of what I use. Of course, I'm not all that successful in finding someone to please and be pleased by (finding Craigslist vastly more useful for real-life meetings by a longshot) - but that doesn't stop me from learning from and contributing to the message boards! :) On the other hand, I do realize there are many men who, in the worst case, log into Collarme and view all the thousands of "available women" in the picture sort that pops up in the beginning and then, notwithstanding what the profile says or whether they lady has logged in within the past century or posted forum articles or journal entries, reads just the profile (if that), and then sends off a "wanna fuck" letter to her, and every single other possible profile (this could keep the guy busy for a week or more, given the hundreds, nay, maybe thousands of "available women" that Collarme offers). After, say, a hundred or two hundred emails, guess what? The troll will get a hit or three. He'll work those three ... but again, notice that the profile was the least of the criteria (just being female and having an address on CM was all that really mattered). Oh, but I digress (as I am wont to do, my brain firing in all directions, as usual) ... In summary, the profile, for me, isn't all that important in that I don't even know what's on mine and I read forum posts and journal entries and use don't ever respond to anyone who hasn't been active - and well - that leaves only a handful of profiles whom I've already contacted and gotten to know. Of course, your mileage may vary. Ciao, Pompeii PS: No wonder women complain that some men don't read their profile and respond specifically to it.
|