|
Prinsexx -> RE: switch, fake, or confused? (8/17/2009 6:31:24 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jasonslv So I've been reading more and more of the discussions here and talking to some people on the site, but I'm still left wondering... First of all, I just want to apologize.. I came here, like many new and curious men, wanting to peek into a different world and see if my fantasies were simply that, or something more. So yes, I have trolled, and I'm sorry for that...but I learned about what real, good, bad, and boring profiles look like by doing so. And I've talked to people under false pretenses...no more than talking, but dishonest nonetheless. I can't say I regret it because it was a lesson, as well, but I am sorry for being selfish in those ways. What I haven't yet learned though, is what to call myself. I have lived a vanilla life for 23 years and have fantasized about being dominated by a woman. What I'm now realizing though, is that those desires seem to lay solely in the bedroom. In real life, I am independent and a leader. I want to help people grow and I enjoy structuring others' days to help in that way. While I have no "bdsm" experience, I've advised people on careers and how to get jobs, have worked in a jail, an institute for troubled girls, and have taught. I feel like these experiences have helped to make me a dominant person that can effectively structure someone else's life. On the other hand, my girlfriends have all been strong-minded women. And I do like that. So...I have to admit, after writing this, I feel more confused actually haha. The point is, I feel that I may be 90% dom in real life, but 70% submissive in the bedroom. So does that just make me a mismatch in every which way? I identified (stromgly) as a slave and my profile said so here for the most part of the two years I have been here. I met and formed a relationship with two Masters from here. Released myself from both. I identified as an alpha female slave and that is to say that I like to be dominant to women. However I have had two fabulous relationships with male switches...as cmplax as those relationships were and I was able to switch with them Predomiantly because their sunmissiveness was complax and not what i call narrow-band. They were not dixated on one particular fetish or mode of discipline. So: evolving away from emotional masochism has given me the impetus (oe i have given myself the right) to define myself as switch. My experience and skills are very different as a submissive to those of being dominan. And it's a switch: like being two different people. I will always be a service slave domestically in terms of the three C's...cooking, cleaning, caring. So go figure....slave switch. As I have said on another thread: there are no red lines on a map. Only rivers, and mountains oh and clouds which arent even on a map. We are what we are what we are and thank goodness that we can grow and evolve. Who nows: I may very well becom enslaved and stay enslaved on all levels.
|
|
|
|