|
LafayetteLady -> RE: Diversity win Britains got Talent (5/31/2009 11:20:26 AM)
|
What does the winner of Britain's Got Talent get? I know for America's Got Talent, a Vegas contract is included in the prize. Personally, for the very young children who perform, I don't think the pressure of doing 2 shows a night in a Vegas show is a great thing. Of course, someone that young hasn't won so it hasn't been an issue. I think that all the contestants who make it to the finals on these shows can take things as far as they are willing to go. What the show gives them is the exposure, getting their act out there for people to see. So even if they don't win, there will be agents and producers who want to work with them, which is great. As for the whole Susan Boyle thing....we live in a society where everyone is first expected to be beautiful and thin, THEN someone will determine if they have talent. It's really a shameful commentary on our society. Susan Boyle HAS talent. Is she the greatest singer in the world? Of course not. Would she have gotten that far if she looked like say, Jennifer Aniston and sang like that? Probably not. And THAT is what is unfair. Sometimes you have to wonder if for the singers, what would happen if we were only allowed to HEAR them sing without seeing them? Would that change the voting? For America's version, last year a guy won who was singing opera. The two acts that came in 2nd and 3rd (honestly don't remember which place for each) were far more talented and far more marketable. The one was a singer and he has a vocal quality and style that was unique. The two guys from the inner city who were playing violins were out of this world and really deserved to win and they didn't. I haven't heard anything about any of the acts (1st place either). So what does that say about these shows as a whole?
|
|
|
|