|
Focus50 -> RE: Honestly? I'm Perfect. (5/18/2009 4:01:35 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DemonKia Pet peeve time. I detest when I honestly communicate about some failing of mine & am met with the other not offering up their own vulnerability, but rather using the moment to talk about how they don't have that particular failing. For me, anymore, it's something of an instant communication killer. I am, of course, discussing this within the framework of attempting to build some kind of relationship more than 'friend', of trying to establish trust & so on & so forth . . . . . . Example: I say: Oh, I can be so shallow sometimes. The other responds: Oh, I'm never shallow, I don't care about superficial stuff, blah blah blah . . . .. This is one of my little 'litmus tests' of honesty. To some degree it's not really what I think of as honesty or intimacy if it's just about showing off how wonderful one is, it's really only getting somewhere if there is disclosure of one's less-than-pretty stuff . . . . . . It's true, they could be perfect, but since I'm so far from perfection there's not much place for perfect people in my life . . . . . *heavy sigh* &, yeah, I have noticed that there are some 'domly' types who equate 'dommitude' as requiring projecting a rather unrelentingly 'perfect' front . . . . . More something I've encountered in real life rather than online, now that I've given it some thought -- tho' I wanna specify, again, that I'm talking about more in-depth interactions rather than the multitudes of spammers, scammers, & wham-bam-thank-you-ma'amers & their one-line contributions to the field of communication . . . . . . So, is this perfectionist thing a symptom of 'domination toxicity', so to speak? Anybody know what I mean? As a male from Mars, my pet peeve is trying to decipher what it is you women are calling "honest communication" at times like this.... Your example: "I say: Oh, I can be so shallow sometimes. The other responds: Oh, I'm never shallow, I don't care about superficial stuff, blah blah blah . . . .." If I'm understanding you correctly, said dom *failed* your "litmus test" because he (reasonably) thought your topic of "communication" was of you ocasionally being shallow when, in fact, he was supposed to recognise that you were conducting a veiled fishing expedition? And it's his *honesty* that's on the line as a consequence? No, wait, it's that he's impossibly perfect??? Or would that be imperfect? Which brings us to "domitude"??? I'd personally confess to the latter if someone tried to skip me through hoops like this...! On Mars, we only speak English.... If I'm talking to someone who only speaks Spanish, then it's their fault for not understanding me. Does this conclusion at least equate to the gist of your "pet peeve" re "communication"? Focus.
|
|
|
|