|
stella41b -> RE: Can Oregon afford the death penalty? (5/1/2009 4:30:58 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FangsNfeet The "Politicaly Correct" or so called "Humane" death penalty is not cost effective. You got the drugs, the EMT giving the three drugs, and then the doc who declared the person dead on top of bla bla bla BS. What can I say? Shot gun shells are cheap. That's another kettle of fish and I'm not even going to mention the recent inquiry and debate into the death penalty and issues with the execution protocol in Ohio or the issues the AMA have with doctors attending executions. We're talking about the legal costs involved in the trials which have to be two stage after Furman, not to mention all those US Supreme Court rulings such as Lockett vs. Ohio, Endmund vs. Coker, Glass vs. Louisiana and so on. I tried to cover this topic in a previous thread (deleted) with funding issues in states such as Georgia which together with Florida has to currently stall many of its capital trials through being unable to cover the costs for court appointed defence lawyers and expert witnesses as a result of the current recession. This hiatus isn't helpful to anyone, it doesn't bring justice, nor does it offer any sort of conclusion to some pretty heinous crimes nor does it do anything other than to prolong the agony and heartache of the families of victims awaiting closure through the conclusion of such trials. Would not the current economic climate in the US provide a worthwhile opportunity to reexamine the validity of the death penalty? Just how deeply attached are people to the death penalty as a part of society? Is it not the case that it has now outlived its usefulness and it's time to move on and look at better and cheaper alternatives?
|
|
|
|