DedicatedDom40
Posts: 350
Joined: 9/22/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BKSir As far as the manifesto, I don't understand why it was released, it was his personal writings, and, although I think we can all say conclusively that he wasn't quite right in the head, honestly, who cares? The biggest problem, I believe, is that 'news', such as it is, has become such a load of sensationalized crap that it's pathetic. If I wanted sensationalism, I'd turn on E! The local Knoxville area really didnt see it as senationalism. They were more afraid of it. The religous types seemed afraid it would paint churches badly or cause people to see them as a 'high risk environment', the political right was predicatbly afraid for obvious reasons, and others were afraid of the copycat element. The publishing of it was 7 months after the shooting, so it wasnt driven by the 'media scoop' mentality. I suspect the paper struggled with the ethics, but decided to release it more for the reason DomKen said, more community discussion and confrontation of some of our "ugly truths" is the answer to hate speech. I disagree with those who say he was nuts. He was a frustrated man pushed too far by a variety of inputs. Acting out nuts is different than being nuts The irony is he will be spending his life in jail, spared a death sentence courtesy of liberals, in a prison built by a tax system spawned by liberals, getting buttfucked like some liberal homo, and getting 3 squares a day and a roof over his head, just like some liberal welfare program provides to those on the outside. I forget..... who won?
|