|
ScooterTrash -> RE: How much does the American government OWE it's citizens? (2/28/2009 8:34:54 AM)
|
quote:
Should the government give us welfare/unemployment benefits for months, years, a lifetime? Unemployment is insurance, like any other insurance it should have a limit or a term, dependent on what has been paid in. Once that limit or term has been exhausted, sorry, it's over. No different than car insurance, I expect them to fulfill the obligation I paid them for, but not more than that. If I wreck my vehicle, I don't expect them to repair it and then customize it, all I expect is for it to be repaired. quote:
Should the government help out large numbers of people on the brink of foreclosure? No, mortgage insurance was likely available at the time they financed their home. If they didn't think it was important enough for them to pay the premium to cover them in case of an event such as extended unemployment, then I don't see why the government should be obligated to cover them for their shortsightedness. A home is an investment, it should be treated as such and if financed, treated as any other investment you would borrow money to invest in, there is some risk. quote:
Should the government feed, clothe and give shelter to those that are homeless? No, but they certainly could promote charities to provide for mass housing and the states could contribute, either in cash or tax incentives, to organizations that operate food banks, soup kitchens and housing. I don't have an issue with someone asking for help, I have issues with being forced to help. quote:
Should the government provide extensive free health care for everyone? Free? Not exactly, but organizing a massive group policy for all citizens would not be out of the question. Free, is a tricky term, since nothing really is free, someone somewhere has to pay for product & services, so funding has to come from somewhere. Providing medical coverage though a massive medical insurance fund would be a more viable option. Again, it would be insurance so there would be limits. Since there would be limits, training should also be provided so the recipients could be better (more aware) consumers. Just like private policies, if there are abusers (emergency room for the sniffles, etc.) it would drive costs up, so there would have to be a wake up call for everyone involved to use this medical coverage wisely in order to make it work. quote:
Should the government pay for all those that qualify to go to college? Absolutely not! College is a luxury, not a necessity. I would not have issues with some form of selective scholarship based on achievements, but across the board just because they "qualify" seems overkill. A vast majority of college grads never utilize the higher education they received anyway, so promoting this by throwing money at it would be a poor investment. I've seen a lot of idiots with degrees and a lot of high school grads that are brilliant and successful...those results speak for themselves. quote:
Should the government provide more cradle to the grave benefits to everyone? No, actually they should butt out and provide less. Just like a private individuals budget, overextending themselves trying to provide too much is doing nothing but putting them in the hole, consequently private tax paying citizens are having to pick up the tab. People need to realize that there are consequences to poor planning and trying to manipulate the system. We need temporary programs in place to assist those who are victims of circumstance, but we do not need social programs to bail out those who are victims of their own incompetence. Folks (including corporations) need to be responsible for their own actions.
|
|
|
|