Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia Law in Swat Valley.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia Law in Swat Valley. Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia Law ... - 2/17/2009 12:35:28 PM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
A few weeks after this new Administration gets off to a shaky start, sending envoys around the world, and Pakistan inks a "peace deal" with the Taliban who control their Swat Valley area, and agreeing that Sharia Law will rule. Where is Cheney when you need him?   Will be interesting to see how this first test is handled by President Obama. Lets hope he gets off the campaign trail and back to Washington.

              http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7891955.stm
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 2:54:57 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Why is this a problem? The US cannot continue running around fighting these battles. If the people of that region want it, then let it be. If a horrible massacre happens or some such, then let it be.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 3:10:54 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
Why is this a problem? The US cannot continue running around fighting these battles. If the people of that region want it, then let it be. If a horrible massacre happens or some such, then let it be.


That must be why we're sending 17,000 troops.
quote:

President Barack Obama has approved adding about 17,000 U.S. troops for the flagging war in Afghanistan, administration, defense and congressional officials said Tuesday.
The Obama administration is expected to announce on Tuesday that it will send one additional Army brigade and an unknown number of Marines to Afghanistan this spring and summer. Officials spoke on condition of anonymity ahead of the official announcement. About 8,000 Marines are expected to go in first, followed by about 9,000 Army troops.

Source: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090217/D96DJ2V80.html  


I know with all this 'stimulus' going on there's no room to ponder this issue...

Are there still US troops in Iraq? I know that the current political party in power insured they'd be there until at least June, but anyone heard about a convoy heading over there to take them home?

I know that President Obama followed President Bush's fine example of economic stimulus because of the fine results achieved. (Chrysler now needs another couple Billion) Now, the 'New & Improved' with more pork flavoring, it should do even better. However, I didn't think he'd be following the prior Administration's example of troop deployment. Maybe we're looking at an application of the economic 'zero sum game' situation with troop deployment and war expenditures?

What a "CHANGE!"....

Edited for Correction:
Excuse me, not a "couple of Billion" but $5 Billion:
quote:

Acknowledging that industry conditions are worse than expected when it made the case in December for a government bailout, Chrysler requested an additional $5 billion in government loans. It originally said it would need $3 billion more. The company had previously received $4 billion from the Treasury Department. Source: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090217/D96DJ4080.html  


Hey - they failed! They've earned another $5 Billion!
But the required increase in taxes to fund it will reduce consumer confidence and buying!
So they'll request- and get - another $3-5 Billion!
But the required increase in taxes to fund it will reduce consumer confidence and buying!
So they'll request -and get - another $3-5 Billion!

The reality of the economic stimulus program based upon rewarding failure on the backs of the successful. Repeat until you no longer have 'successful' and you reach the obvious, if not verbalized goal, total government involvement in every aspect of the lives of US citizens. 

< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 2/17/2009 3:25:54 PM >

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 5:13:40 PM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Why is this a problem? The US cannot continue running around fighting these battles. If the people of that region want it, then let it be. If a horrible massacre happens or some such, then let it be.


I hear ya, but you must have forgotten the tough talk from candidate Obama who said that if was president and they found Usama in Pakistan he would send troops in to take him out!  So your suggestion is that the foreign policy of now President Obama is to "see no evil" "hear no evil"  "speak no evil". When in doubt...say nothing....brilliant. 

The political leaders of the world have already figured out that the new American President is an empty suit.  Whether he is or not...it is that perception that makes all of us a little less safe this evening.  The soviets underestimated JFK and we almost had a nuclear war over Cuba.  However, JFK had the brains of Bobby behind him and some very experience people. Obama has Joe Biden!  Praise Jesus!

JFK also had the memories of WW2 and understood the threat facing the U.S.  I'm not sure this administration understands just how dedicated is our Islamic terorist adversary.  These people are ready to die for Allah...you really can't defend against a martyr.
You may recall that it was the taliban that gave Usama sanctuary..and now they have an area of Pakistan that they will rule with sharia law. That's why it is important.

I agree with you if the people of the region want it...let them be. As far as I'm concerned if they want to grow poppies, and keep their woman ignorant and covered from head to toe...who are we to want to change their "culture".  However, that was not the case in 2001...and I don't want to give them the opportunity to repeat that horror in 2009 or 2010.  That's why it is important..to me at least.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 6:42:22 PM   
UPSG


Posts: 331
Joined: 1/22/2009
Status: offline
I'm with Orion on this one.

Many people of the secular West tend to think Islam is some exotic religion entirely different than Eastern and Western Christianity. This is not really so. Islam is nothing more than a form of conservative Christianity. Educated Catholics have known this since time immemorial and that is why some educated Catholics of the past have tried to argue Islam is a heresy of Christianity.

Both Islam and Protestantism may be regarded as Reformations within their specific cultural and geographic milieu of Christian, Pagan, and Jewish regions. Both were historically conservative movements intent on "purification."

Islam in certain respect may be even more conservative than Calvinism. It is sola scriptora like Calvinism and Protestantism in general but on steroids. Every single Arab word in the Koran being handed down from God - not inspired and creatively written through the medium of man. The smaller Sufi sects are another matter but they are not much appreciated by the largest two sects of Islam.

Muslims in the West typically are pro-death penalty and anti-homosexual. They are, contrary to secular liberal politics, conservative. Iran has already put to death as many homosexuals as the Spanish Inquisitiuon put to death heretics over the course of several hundred years (Spain, not Iran).

Islam also critically, is like Catholicism in that it does not view nation-states as an entity or creation above the global nationhood (nation and state are different things) of God. In Catholicism that is the Church ("gathered community") in Islam, my memory fails me, but I think they call it the sacred ulma, or said another way all Muslims on earth.

Unlike Catholicism in Islam protection of the faith does not rest with Bishops but with every single member of Islam on earth. I think this is a big point. Because the Taliban in this sense are just a drop in the bucket. Not to say Muslims are one monolithic group, certainly sweltering, humid, Indonesian Islam is not the same as Islam in Afhganistan and Islam in that wonderfully safe, and well run city of Dubia with it's quality of life that bests most Americans any day of the week, is not the same as Islam in the Saudia Arbia or the Balkans.

But Americans entered Vietnam not really understanding the culture of the people and that did not end well. Secular people of the West in their anti-Christian aroused hatreds, smuggly assume Islam is just like "Cafeteria Catholicism." Certainly there is some of that to be found worldwide in Islam but I would suggest its a lesser occurance.

I think the U.S. would do better just continuing to get on well with the UAE which is about money and not physical jihad nor anti-Western. It might be the closet thing to a Sao Paulo, Paris, London, or New York the Islamic world has. In my opinion if the U.S. gets to heavily involved in the Pakistan region it will spark negative reaction worlwide in Islam - again the protectors of Islam are the Muslims themselves and no small, clearly dressed, group of Bishops.

Every one of the 5 major religions on earth as it is, are already in tensions of off and on martial conflict with Islamic groups, from Buddhist Thailand to the Catholic Phillipinnes to Hindue India to Jewish Israel (where the Palestianians have good reason to fight).

If they want to live a certain way then let them so long as they are not bothering us. Many jihadist are coming from White predominate Balkan areas anyways. They can walk unsuspected in a White, upper-middle-class, Midwestern mall. And blow the thing to kingdom come.

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 6:55:19 PM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
UPSG...nice post on the muslim religion.  The key point of it all that you make, and please correct me if I'm wrong, was  "If they want to live a certain way then let them so long as they are not bothering us."  Well..they sure want to "bother us"...like kill 3,000 in the Towers.  I don't know where you live but I lived and worked in NYC at the time...I also worked for a firm that was in the south Tower and we lost six people when the building collapsed. I would say that was a tad more than a "bother".  That attack too a couple of years of training, was very sophisticatd, and bad one purpose...to kill as many Americans as possible on a stage big enough to get world attention...and that they did.  George Bush deleted his entire presidential agenda on 9/12/01 and his entire focus was on protecting U.S.  US...from another attack like that on his watch. He did that well for the remainder of his term, notwithstanding attacks from the left, the
AC:LU and even a neighbor who sold insurance and was convinced the NSA was tapping her phone...I guess to get the latest competitive rates that State Farm or Prudential were posting.

Sometimes a President grows into the job when reality hits.and I hope, I pray that  Obama succeeds as well as Bush for the country and for some very personal reasons.

(in reply to UPSG)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 7:24:42 PM   
MasterShake69


Posts: 752
Joined: 11/30/2005
Status: offline
SO has any media asked Obama an actual tough question about this situation in Pakistan yet?

He had a photo op for his bill signing today which took him about 4 days to get around to doing.

hope and change turns into more of the same.....with george w obama.




(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 7:50:53 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Why is this a problem? The US cannot continue running around fighting these battles. If the people of that region want it, then let it be. If a horrible massacre happens or some such, then let it be.


I hear ya, but you must have forgotten the tough talk from candidate Obama who said that if was president and they found Usama in Pakistan he would send troops in to take him out!  So your suggestion is that the foreign policy of now President Obama is to "see no evil" "hear no evil"  "speak no evil". When in doubt...say nothing....brilliant. 


Sorry but I do not see any evidence that Osama is there. You posted about a deal being struck with the Taliban.

quote:


The political leaders of the world have already figured out that the new American President is an empty suit.  Whether he is or not...it is that perception that makes all of us a little less safe this evening.  The soviets underestimated JFK and we almost had a nuclear war over Cuba.  However, JFK had the brains of Bobby behind him and some very experience people. Obama has Joe Biden!  Praise Jesus!


Obama has made some decent decisions on his way to where he is. You cannot play Chicago politics without being able to think on your feet, and make some solid decisions. I will wait and see before I judge him on something that has not occured yet. I do realize that you have a different agenda though.

quote:


JFK also had the memories of WW2 and understood the threat facing the U.S.  I'm not sure this administration understands just how dedicated is our Islamic terorist adversary.  These people are ready to die for Allah...you really can't defend against a martyr.
You may recall that it was the taliban that gave Usama sanctuary..and now they have an area of Pakistan that they will rule with sharia law. That's why it is important.


Yeah I am very familiar with the religion, and some of the fanatics of it. Regardless of whether the Taliban gave Osama sanctuary or not, I could care less. Let the residents and power figures of that area do what the heel they want, which will likely be killing each other.

quote:


I agree with you if the people of the region want it...let them be. As far as I'm concerned if they want to grow poppies, and keep their woman ignorant and covered from head to toe...who are we to want to change their "culture".  However, that was not the case in 2001...and I don't want to give them the opportunity to repeat that horror in 2009 or 2010.  That's why it is important..to me at least.



If you do not want the horror repeated, then instead of spending the huge amounts of money going over there, just spend it here on high tech security for the ports, airports, closing the borders, and other things that will actually make us more secure.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 7:56:41 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
I had a friend that was a government employee, and used to work in OK City. What group should I hold accountable and hunt down for that?

Extremist exist in all different forms of ideologies. Usually the group will eventually curtail those that continue to endanger the group. This means that the Muslim world will eventually curtail it's own. It happened with the other sects of the Abrahamic religions, and it will happen with this one.

You cannot kill an ideal with one bullet, but you can increase recruitment and shift moderates to radicals by using force incorrectly.


quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

UPSG...nice post on the muslim religion.  The key point of it all that you make, and please correct me if I'm wrong, was  "If they want to live a certain way then let them so long as they are not bothering us."  Well..they sure want to "bother us"...like kill 3,000 in the Towers.  I don't know where you live but I lived and worked in NYC at the time...I also worked for a firm that was in the south Tower and we lost six people when the building collapsed. I would say that was a tad more than a "bother".  That attack too a couple of years of training, was very sophisticatd, and bad one purpose...to kill as many Americans as possible on a stage big enough to get world attention...and that they did.  George Bush deleted his entire presidential agenda on 9/12/01 and his entire focus was on protecting U.S.  US...from another attack like that on his watch. He did that well for the remainder of his term, notwithstanding attacks from the left, the
AC:LU and even a neighbor who sold insurance and was convinced the NSA was tapping her phone...I guess to get the latest competitive rates that State Farm or Prudential were posting.

Sometimes a President grows into the job when reality hits.and I hope, I pray that  Obama succeeds as well as Bush for the country and for some very personal reasons.


_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 8:52:55 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Great posts, Orion. The last sentence crystallizes it.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 10:41:19 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
Some excellent posts here, in particular the one from UPGS.

I find myself at a loss to try and understand what compelling interests the United States has in Afghanistan, other than that cross-country pipeline. It's a given that UBL isn't on the To-Do list anymore. The US never gave a shit when women were executed in that "soccer" stadium in Kabul (I saw, on PBS, a clandestine video of a woman being executed by some shitbag prick (words fail me) and that image will stay with me forever).

If it is going to be our policy to wipe out the Taliban, then do it. No half-assed measueres. That stupid shit GWB took over a year to get troops into Afghanistan all the while knowing who was responsible for 9/11. I would have had troops there within days.

If it isn't then leave. I really don't give a shit if tribal farmers are growing poppies; I'm of the opinion that opioids are way UNDER-utilized in the West for pain relief, and if the only way some people can get relief is from the street, so be it.

But CLARIFY what the fuck we are doing there.

_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 10:54:25 PM   
UPSG


Posts: 331
Joined: 1/22/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

UPSG...nice post on the muslim religion.  The key point of it all that you make, and please correct me if I'm wrong, was  "If they want to live a certain way then let them so long as they are not bothering us."  Well..they sure want to "bother us"...like kill 3,000 in the Towers.  I don't know where you live but I lived and worked in NYC at the time...I also worked for a firm that was in the south Tower and we lost six people when the building collapsed. I would say that was a tad more than a "bother".  That attack too a couple of years of training, was very sophisticatd, and bad one purpose...to kill as many Americans as possible on a stage big enough to get world attention...and that they did.  George Bush deleted his entire presidential agenda on 9/12/01 and his entire focus was on protecting U.S.  US...from another attack like that on his watch. He did that well for the remainder of his term, notwithstanding attacks from the left, the
AC:LU and even a neighbor who sold insurance and was convinced the NSA was tapping her phone...I guess to get the latest competitive rates that State Farm or Prudential were posting.

Sometimes a President grows into the job when reality hits.and I hope, I pray that  Obama succeeds as well as Bush for the country and for some very personal reasons.


Yeah, that was my main point, Cory.

I was all the way over here in Wisconsin during 9/11 so the impact did not effect me as it did New Yorkers or those in Manhattan. And to be honest with you, Al Qaida or Islamic extremists in general are not a big concern in my neck of the woods. I think more our own parochial street level violence is what concerns most the people in my city - at least in certain areas.

Now, I could just be uniformed or maybe even a little to naive, but the Taliban seems to be some ultra conservative group that wants to create some strict Islamic style paradise in their little region and not necessarily wishing to get obliterated by combined Western powers. They don't seem capable of overthrowing Pakistan and if for some odd miracle they ever did I would reckon India would move forces in - with Pakistani approval - crush them. I think Pakistan has nuclear weapons and I know India does so I don't think India would allow a situation at their boarder to spiral that far out of control without take resolute military action.

Ethnically, the Pakistanis are East Indian anyways, most of them are Muslim though, so I would say let the Indians sort themselves out. If it was mass starvation or genocide or something going on I would have different feelings about intervention.

To be honest with you, that is some ugly fuckin land over there the Taliban is in , if I had to be confined to that depressing looking place I'd be somber at best. If some of the people over there want to live there with no alcohol and no strip clubs and women walking around looking like ninjas then let them. That's like Tibet... another ugly fuckin place and mixed with extreme cold. I understand why people move to and want to live in Hawaii... but those places? Eh, I digress though.

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/17/2009 11:52:27 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub
George Bush deleted his entire presidential agenda on 9/12/01 and his entire focus was on protecting U.S.  US...from another attack like that on his watch. He did that well for the remainder of his term, notwithstanding attacks from the left, the
AC:LU and even a neighbor who sold insurance and was convinced the NSA was tapping her phone...I guess to get the latest competitive rates that State Farm or Prudential were posting.

Deleted his agenda? He only tried to privatize social security, imagine if that had happened people really would be jumping out windows.

As to protecting us from attack, he failed and failed miserably. Thousands of US citizens are dead today from attacks committed by Al Qaeda and other muslim extremists since 9/11.

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/18/2009 1:33:00 AM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub
George Bush deleted his entire presidential agenda on 9/12/01 and his entire focus was on protecting U.S.  US...from another attack like that on his watch. He did that well for the remainder of his term, notwithstanding attacks from the left, the
AC:LU and even a neighbor who sold insurance and was convinced the NSA was tapping her phone...I guess to get the latest competitive rates that State Farm or Prudential were posting.

Deleted his agenda? He only tried to privatize social security, imagine if that had happened people really would be jumping out windows.

As to protecting us from attack, he failed and failed miserably. Thousands of US citizens are dead today from attacks committed by Al Qaeda and other muslim extremists since 9/11.


The democrat party slammed the young people in this country with all that sound and fury against the privatization of Social Security.  So now 15&% of your annual income is put into a fund...that is broke to the tune of  more than US$60 TRILLIONS, and that estimate was as of a few years ago and is higher today.  Now if your over 60 years of age that numbe might not mean a thing...but if you are now making your SSI contributions at 20, 30, or even in your late 40's..lots of luck to ya. If the idiots in Congress did not kill the Bush plan, you would have been able to be in charge of some percentage, maybe half, of your annual donation to the United States Treasury. Particularly if you are one of those enthusiatic citizens of the Obamanation and believe our salvation is at hand...today..right now, would be the perfect time to start a long term investment program. You could be investing in gold you could be investing in a General Electric at close to $10 a share..a Cisco in the mid-teens,and on and on.  Even those who have lost 30-50% in their 401k still HAVE 50 to 70% of their money.  If I had been able to invest my own funds over the past thirty years I would be one happy camper right now in the midst of all this carnage.  Personally, I would rather have my future based on what I do with my money instead of handing in over to Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, that tax cheat Mr. Geithner, and most of all Barack Obama.

                          http://www.socialsecurity.org/sstw/sstw11-04-05.pdf

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/18/2009 3:58:03 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub


The democrat party slammed the young people in this country with all that sound and fury against the privatization of Social Security.  So now 15&% of your annual income is put into a fund...that is broke to the tune of  more than US$60 TRILLIONS, and that estimate was as of a few years ago and is higher today.  Now if your over 60 years of age that numbe might not mean a thing...but if you are now making your SSI contributions at 20, 30, or even in your late 40's..lots of luck to ya. If the idiots in Congress did not kill the Bush plan, you would have been able to be in charge of some percentage, maybe half, of your annual donation to the United States Treasury. Particularly if you are one of those enthusiatic citizens of the Obamanation and believe our salvation is at hand...today..right now, would be the perfect time to start a long term investment program. You could be investing in gold you could be investing in a General Electric at close to $10 a share..a Cisco in the mid-teens,and on and on.  Even those who have lost 30-50% in their 401k still HAVE 50 to 70% of their money.  If I had been able to invest my own funds over the past thirty years I would be one happy camper right now in the midst of all this carnage.  Personally, I would rather have my future based on what I do with my money instead of handing in over to Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, that tax cheat Mr. Geithner, and most of all Barack Obama.

                        http://www.socialsecurity.org/sstw/sstw11-04-05.pdf


One good blog deserves another:



TomPaine.com - Social Security Is Not In Crisiswww.tompaine.com/articles/social_security_is_not_in_crisis.php

Why would anyone want to change a system that works so well? The main reason is that President Bush and the financial industry have managed to convince people that Social Security is on the edge of bankruptcy. Millions of younger workers, and even many older workers, now believe that they will never see their Social Security checks.


......... The official numbers tell a very different story. The Social Security trustees' report shows that the program can pay all scheduled benefits through the year 2042, with no changes whatsoever. Even after 2042, the program would always be able to pay a higher benefit (in today’s dollars) than what retirees currently receive, although less than the full scheduled benefit

.
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office did an independent investigation of Social Security’s finances and came up with an even brighter picture. They found that it could pay all benefits through the year 2052 with no changes whatsoever. Furthermore, according to both sets of projections, the changes required to keep the program solvent through its entire 75-year planning period are smaller than the changes made in any of the decades from the 1950s to the 1980s.

< Message edited by rulemylife -- 2/18/2009 4:00:40 AM >

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia ... - 2/18/2009 4:45:11 AM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub


The democrat party slammed the young people in this country with all that sound and fury against the privatization of Social Security.  So now 15&% of your annual income is put into a fund...that is broke to the tune of  more than US$60 TRILLIONS, and that estimate was as of a few years ago and is higher today.  Now if your over 60 years of age that numbe might not mean a thing...but if you are now making your SSI contributions at 20, 30, or even in your late 40's..lots of luck to ya. If the idiots in Congress did not kill the Bush plan, you would have been able to be in charge of some percentage, maybe half, of your annual donation to the United States Treasury. Particularly if you are one of those enthusiatic citizens of the Obamanation and believe our salvation is at hand...today..right now, would be the perfect time to start a long term investment program. You could be investing in gold you could be investing in a General Electric at close to $10 a share..a Cisco in the mid-teens,and on and on.  Even those who have lost 30-50% in their 401k still HAVE 50 to 70% of their money.  If I had been able to invest my own funds over the past thirty years I would be one happy camper right now in the midst of all this carnage.  Personally, I would rather have my future based on what I do with my money instead of handing in over to Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, that tax cheat Mr. Geithner, and most of all Barack Obama.

                       http://www.socialsecurity.org/sstw/sstw11-04-05.pdf


One good blog deserves another:



TomPaine.com - Social Security Is Not In Crisiswww.tompaine.com/articles/social_security_is_not_in_crisis.php

Why would anyone want to change a system that works so well? The main reason is that President Bush and the financial industry have managed to convince people that Social Security is on the edge of bankruptcy. Millions of younger workers, and even many older workers, now believe that they will never see their Social Security checks.


......... The official numbers tell a very different story. The Social Security trustees' report shows that the program can pay all scheduled benefits through the year 2042, with no changes whatsoever. Even after 2042, the program would always be able to pay a higher benefit (in today’s dollars) than what retirees currently receive, although less than the full scheduled benefit

.
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office did an independent investigation of Social Security’s finances and came up with an even brighter picture. They found that it could pay all benefits through the year 2052 with no changes whatsoever. Furthermore, according to both sets of projections, the changes required to keep the program solvent through its entire 75-year planning period are smaller than the changes made in any of the decades from the 1950s to the 1980s.


BLOG FIGHT!!
 
True the SSA reports said that even after 2041 the Trust Fund, albeit exhausted, would see annual revenues to pay recepients 74% of promised benefits.  Of course it takes a lot of faith in "government promises" to believe that..doesn't it?
http://www.aarp.org/special_static/usukpensionsdialogue/conf_papers/remarks/keynote_7.21.05_DWalkerppt.pdf

There is no more expert man in the country than David Walker and, while he believes we can still avoid the "big one"...ie the ultimate collapse of our financial system, we have to act intelligently NOW!  We are in deep doo doo and and somehow Obama has got to get in front of the legislature and not let them write his program to turn this mess around.  Pelosi has destroyed the honeymoon period and good will that a lot of us were prepared to offer the new President..not because we liked his politics, but because we love our families and country and we need him to succeed.  We can worry about throwing him out in four years.  And, hey, if he should do a great job I might even vote for the guy..( I was seriously considering Hillary over McCain)

Be well...



(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 16
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Pakistan inks deal with Taliban...Agrees to Sharia Law in Swat Valley. Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.203