|
hizgeorgiapeach -> RE: Capt Sullenburger-US Airways 1549 Cockpit Audio Tape (2/10/2009 4:43:30 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ArizonaSunSwitch Actually, the glide ratio of pretty much any airliner is better than the typical Cessna 172's or Piper Cherokee's 12 to 1 to 14 to 1 (i forget the exact number). If I remember correctly an MD-80 is up around 18 to 1. If i'm going into the trees or water i'd still rather be in the 172 tho. (and of course the rate of descent of a unpowered jet is much higher than the 172). The Piper Cherokee 170 and Arrow 181 (which is basically a glorified Cherokee with retrac gear) is 14/1 in optimal conditions. The catch - you Never have Optimal conditions during an Actual emergency. A Cherokee is what I primarily flew for my primary training, and what I still have a great deal of fondness for. Cessnas I'm not so hot on - I detest the 152, and just haven't bothered to put in a lot of time over the years in a 172 or 182. I'm very much a low wing fan unless I'm specifically going up for jump time, but when it's jump time I'm not the one in the left seat! (Which means I haven't bothered to really stay up to date on the specs for highwings lol.) Since I'm a poor woman and flying is an Expensive hobby, getting a jet rating added to my certs has been beyond my range (*sob*) - so other than what I remember from comments made by various CFIs that I've flown with in the past decade while on BFRs, while adding rates, while doing my ICC, etc - I've never taken the time to really study the specific glide ratios on the heavies. As it is, I have yet to get my type specific for a VTail Doctor Killer - which I REALLY WANT even though it's still a prop job - if/when I add that, then I'll start considering time at one of the large schools to add a jet rate. (That, and if I ever win the lottery where I can Afford to do so lol.)
|
|
|
|