Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

[Poll]

Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM?


A Daily Hard Cap
  0% (0)
A Weekly/Monthly Rolling Cap
  0% (0)
Message "Credits"
  0% (0)
Notification of Likely Spam
  0% (0)
I Don't Like Any of Them
  11% (1)
I Don't Care About CM Spam
  55% (5)
This Post Was Too Long To Read
  22% (2)
Just Beat Me With Your Forum Stick
  0% (0)
What Was The Question Again?
  11% (1)


Total Votes : 9
(last vote on : 2/6/2009 12:53:02 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message


Honsoku -> Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/2/2009 10:08:59 PM)

I have complied some anti-spam ideas. The problem, as it sits, is that there is essentially no cost or limit to the amount of mail that any one mass-mailer can send, so there is little disincentive to high volume/low yield approaches such as the infamous "Kneel, bitch". In order to cut down on spam, this lack of cost ought to be addressed. The fundamental core of each of these ideas is that they only apply if the sender has not received any mail from the recipient in, say, the last six months (the length of time a message will sit in your inbox before being automatically deleted). Therefore, none of these ideas will affect any ongoing conversations, only the attempt to initiate new contact. All numbers are chosen for example purposes and are not intended to be the specific number used. Therefore, if you criticize that it might interfere with ongoing conversations, or that you think the number should be "x" instead of "y", I shall beat you with a forum stick or send you to the corner of the web without supper, whichever you like least [8D] Now, without further adieu;

1: A (hard) cap on new contacts, say five a day. So you can contact up to five people whom has never contacted you a day. Advantage: This is by far the simplest option, almost anyone could comprehend it, and would probably have a devastating effect on the amount of spam/crap if set near to five. Disadvantage: may lead some people to send out *more* messages because of the "use it, or lose it" nature of a hard cap.

2: A rolling cap. A larger total cap, say 20, which counts against all new contacts in the last five days. Advantage: allows for a more flexible system where a person isn't penalized for being a sporadic messenger. Disadvantage: More complicated.

3: An ever increasing message "credit". Every day, a small amount gets added to your credit and every message you send deducts from your total credit. Advantage: absolutely no penalty for being idle for a long period of time. Disadvantage: May lead to rotating "sleeper" spam accounts as spammers wait for the accounts to build credits

None of these can foul a determined spammer as they simply can create more accounts. However, creating more accounts does at least pose additional constraints and hamper the ability to do very wide range spamming due to CM's inefficient browsing/searching interface. Therefore, the best method may be one which doesn't actually limit anything, which would strongly encourage multiple accounts, but instead identifies likely spammers for the reader so they can be treated accordingly. In that spirit;

4: In a person's inbox, have a number next to the sender's name which counts how many new contact attempts that the sender has made in the last month. Couple that with a filter option to filter out any messages from someone with a number above "x". Advantages: No cap, doesn't provide strong encouragement to create multiple accounts, and allows the recipient to make up his/her own mind. Disadvantages: Complicated (to write), doesn't reduce spam, does little to nothing to mitigate the "newbie crush".

If anyone has any additional ideas or improvements, I'm all ears.




KyttynTheMynx -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/2/2009 10:14:14 PM)

I have an awesome spam filter program.  its called the BDS9000.  Block, delete, smile.  Works great, very cheap, never fucks up.




CalifChick -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/2/2009 10:21:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Honsoku

If anyone has any additional ideas...



Yes, two things:

1.  If the site owners thought it was an issue, they would have done something about it.

2.  You have too much time on your hands.


Cali




Honsoku -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/2/2009 10:36:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

quote:

ORIGINAL: Honsoku

If anyone has any additional ideas...



Yes, two things:

1. If the site owners thought it was an issue, they would have done something about it.

2. You have too much time on your hands.


Cali



Ah yes, because all good ideas would have been done already as the owners are omniscient. So Collarme must already be in the site owners' ideal state. You're slipping Cali, I know you can do better than that [8D]




dreamofthemoon -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/2/2009 11:20:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KyttynTheMynx

I have an awesome spam filter program.  its called the BDS9000.  Block, delete, smile.  Works great, very cheap, never fucks up.

Ah, you have that program, too? [:D]




GreedyTop -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/2/2009 11:21:20 PM)

funny..so do I!!  *smooches Dreamy*




dreamofthemoon -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/2/2009 11:34:35 PM)

*smooches teh Greedy one*  How's you?




GreedyTop -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/2/2009 11:52:25 PM)

I's ok...  tired and feeling a bit under the weather.. dammit.




dreamofthemoon -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/2/2009 11:59:14 PM)

Aww, hugs!




GreedyTop -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 12:02:42 AM)

*smooch*




CalifChick -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 12:30:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Honsoku

Ah yes, because all good ideas would have been done already as the owners are omniscient. So Collarme must already be in the site owners' ideal state.


I never said that.  But I also haven't seen a request for ideas to deal with this perceived problem, either.  See, I took your post as serious.  But if this is along the lines of "what would I do if I won the lottery", then have a good time.


Cali




Raechard -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 2:28:43 AM)

Spam, don’t care, don’t get any here.




Dnomyar -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 3:25:31 AM)

Seems that everything I write is spam. So now what????




purepleasure -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 4:25:19 AM)

how did you get the BDS9000 proggie already?!?!?!!???  I still have BDS 4400.  I am sooooo behind on stuff.




DesFIP -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 4:27:07 AM)

The problem is that for things like GT's wedding, one person is sending out lots of messages one day and then nothing for a week. Your ideas would make it impossible to send out these kinds of notices.

Besides, how much spam do you get? I get an occasional one, all I do is delete it. Unless of course you are changing your profile daily to come up in the new list, at which point you are asking for all those form letters.




Raechard -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 4:40:03 AM)

Most spam is driven by spamware created in Fortran by J.V. Penny, and we all know that J.V. Penny built an opt out system into his spamware. So as long as this string is entered at the top of a profile the spamware will ignore it and move onto the next profile: '/device, spam, off'[8|]




sirsholly -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 4:41:32 AM)

quote:

Most spam is driven by spamware created in Fortran by J.V. Penny,


that does it...i refuse to shop there anymore!!!




Dnomyar -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 5:54:42 AM)

Why did you shop there in the first place. If you looked at the tags they all said Spam.




SassySarijane -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 6:05:24 AM)

Honestly? I think people want it too easy and convenient, they want people to fix things so they are comfortable and don't have to make their own efforts. I get more spam on my outside emails than I do here (a ton trust me) and I just delete it and go on with life. Nothing you can do will totally stop it, so you just have to deal with it rather than trying to get others to set things up so you don't have to.




Nikitaa -> RE: Preferred Anti-Spam Measure For CM? (2/3/2009 6:12:46 AM)

I can not find spam because too many submissive men write messages to me. Then they write more messages asking if I see first message. Then some write message YELLING nasty words because I did not respond to message or because I did respond and said no. Then some make new accounts and try again.

Spam can not get past sub man filter. lol

I assume you refer to spam men receive. I was told men receive many messages from yahoo girls. "Hi baby, I want to whip you, see me naked at yahoo.cum" I think this funny. lol. I want to act as yahoo girl.

"Hi I am Nikitaa. Do you want to sit in bathtub long time. Go to see me naked on yuhoo.cum"





Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125