|
DrSysAdmin -> RE: submission and codependency (1/24/2009 9:08:14 AM)
|
KoM - I think we will simply have to agree to disagree on many things. I speak on things the way I see them, and if you construe those views to be "global" or general statements - thats up to you. Often it is worded that way, because thats how I personally see it based on the way I think and my own experience. Now - with that said - you bring up 2 issues. First, the "I didn't know that D's had a Job description!" note in context of its reply to my earlier statement. While I will grant that there is no definitive manual that can encompass every facet and cover every situation, the comment seems to imply that a Dominand should feel no sense of responsibility to the ones they own. Having read enough of your postings here, I doubt that you meant it that way. However, that's not my concern as your life and theirs are - yours and theirs. I do think personally that every Dominant has a deep responsibility to one he claims as his own to push them to grow in many areas - both here and in the nilla world. In my view, and I accept that my view is my own (though the world would be better off it adopted my views LOL), it is by encouraging such growth that trust and its associated bonds grow deeper and deeper. As for a slave or submissive being codependent vs interdependant - there is a huge difference. One way I have stated it is I choose to both tear down and build up my own in such a way that they can stand on their own in any situation - but yet their heart, soul and mind are always at my feet. Does this make them co-dependant? No - because they choose to be owned and guided by me. I personally won't live forever, so to allow a Pet to intertwine her own identity to my own to the point she loses her own individuality - is counterproductive to what I would want for her. I choose instead to make sure mine are independant enough to be without me - and allow their devotion to be what keeps them close, vs allowing a situation where they could not walk away were it necessary. I had a peer and friend who, due to having cancer that he knew would be ultimately fatal, released and sent away his one slave to "spare her" the ordeal of watching him waste away and die. While I know why he did so, I learned alot from that episode. He had allowed her to wrap her entire life into him without looking out for the "what if" - and while his motive was good - the result was 2 lives lost, though in different ways. The girl was forced away, and was totally unable to cope with being independant - she had so totally lost herself in him that she was incapable of standing on her own. Her life is now a total shambles from what I understand, made so much the worse since his passing. I didn't agree with the decision he made, but each has their own life to lead. However, I speak strongly on this because I have seen what can result when safeguards are not taken. I might have a heart attack or stroke today, you may get in a car wreck and be killed tommorow, Ironbear or any other on here might have some other thing happen that incapacitates permenantly or slays them. God forbid something like those things happen - but life offers no such guarantees. Because of that - codependency should NOT ever be allowed by any Dom - and yes - that is a blanket statement. Sure, some may disagree - and they have the right, but I stand by the statement that we have a responsibility to those we accept to insure they are cared for in the healthiest way - and that includes insuring that they do not become so utterly dependant on us that they could not survive or function without us.
|
|
|
|