Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 12:13:09 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Evility

God bless Cesarean sections.



Holy fuck, and there I was thinking I'd heard of pretty much every single possible kink... fucking Cesarean scars is seriously out there, dude. My question: how long, how deep, do you like the C gash to be?

_____________________________



(in reply to Evility)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 12:18:42 PM   
CatdeMedici


Posts: 2257
Joined: 10/20/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: Evility

God bless Cesarean sections.



Holy fuck, and there I was thinking I'd heard of pretty much every single possible kink... fucking Cesarean scars is seriously out there, dude. My question: how long, how deep, do you like the C gash to be?


My guess is he likes them because vaginal births stretch the vagina making the fit loser than before.

_____________________________

I am the Cat, holder of the whip and chair.

"Let's see-whips, dips, chains, chips, yep sounds like a party to Me!"

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 12:22:31 PM   
sblady


Posts: 433
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dastan
Lenghts oscillate betwene 6.27 and 6.68 inches.


For almost every woman that I've ever heard make a comment, that is the perfect size.

quote:


So far, we conclude the 7-8 inch lenght is the desirable measurement, but we wonder...why is it that a number of websites and women forums mention as ideal penises of 8+ inches to 9,5 (9 and 1/2) inches in lenght ?


Because some people like fantasy more than reality.  Because some men like to boast about the size of their equipment. 

I think you guys are fine, and should skip any extracurricular activities that attempt to increase your size, and stick with the old-fashioned way of inserting it into a wet vagina, removing it, and then repeating multiple times, at an increasingly faster rate of speed, until her eyes roll back in her head and she screams your name (or someone's name).


Cali



Yes indeed!!

A guy I once dated constantly bragged about length, girth, etc.  I thought he was exaggerating; he wasn't.   There was no way in hell that thing was getting any where near me.  We're still friends but he can keep that monster in his pants.


_____________________________

Open your arms to change, but don't let go of your values. Dalai Lama





(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 12:24:13 PM   
servantheart


Posts: 960
Joined: 10/26/2006
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Evility

Until they design a pussy of universal width and depth I would think that this discussion is really moot. Beyond that... God bless Cesarean sections.



Ever hear of kegals?

_____________________________

When you really trust someone, you have to be okay with not understanding some things.
~Real Live Preacher, Real Live Preacher weblog, 07-08-04; Anonymous author of RealLivePreacher.com

(in reply to Evility)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 12:28:34 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CatdeMedici
My guess is he likes them because vaginal births stretch the vagina making the fit loser than before.


"Looser fit": rofl!!! Whilst that's thankfully not always the case, he obviously never heard of the secondary effects of cesarean sections  .



< Message edited by kittinSol -- 1/11/2009 12:29:50 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to CatdeMedici)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 12:35:05 PM   
servantheart


Posts: 960
Joined: 10/26/2006
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: CatdeMedici
My guess is he likes them because vaginal births stretch the vagina making the fit loser than before.


"Looser fit": rofl!!! Whilst that's thankfully not always the case, he obviously never heard of the secondary effects of cesarean sections  .




No doubt
 
(don't get me wrong...C-Sections have saved many a mother and baby who otherwise might not have made it, but they're performed unnecessarily too often, almost casually, these days)

_____________________________

When you really trust someone, you have to be okay with not understanding some things.
~Real Live Preacher, Real Live Preacher weblog, 07-08-04; Anonymous author of RealLivePreacher.com

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 12:39:00 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Agreed.

_____________________________



(in reply to servantheart)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 5:33:31 PM   
pixidustpet


Posts: 857
Joined: 6/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CatdeMedici

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: Evility

God bless Cesarean sections.



Holy fuck, and there I was thinking I'd heard of pretty much every single possible kink... fucking Cesarean scars is seriously out there, dude. My question: how long, how deep, do you like the C gash to be?


My guess is he likes them because vaginal births stretch the vagina making the fit loser than before.


sheer silliness.

i've whelped twice, once vaginally, once c-section.  kegels are wonder workers in keeping things well-toned, and i've been told i couldnt have had a natural birth at all, because of muscle tone.  nope, lucky in how i'm built (no, fat chicks arent necessarily like tossing a hotdog down a hallway ) and i take those exercises seriously.

and just like *men* are all built differently, wimmens is too.  consult the kama sutra for that discussion.  fascinating reading.

kitten, just musing

(in reply to CatdeMedici)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 8:24:23 PM   
hizgeorgiapeach


Posts: 1672
Status: offline
While it may all be a matter of personal preference, I am Not amongst those who think it's all in what's done with it/size is irrelevant.  I freely admit that as far as I'm concerned size Does matter.  (And to all you guys out there who've spent so long trying to convince us all that it doesn't - thanks for Nothing.)
 
If it's less than 5 - I won't bother wasting my time with it, because I've learned from experience that I'll end up being bored and yawning halfway through, before he ever gets close to being finished.  Well - let me amend that.  I won't bother unless he can breath through his ears and has a serious oral fetish on the giving end.  More than 9 and it becomes nitemarish.  I dated a guy during highschool who had a measured 10, and one that had a measured 13.  The guy with the 13 never once got a full erection during the time that I knew and dated him - any time he got close to that point he would (literally) pass out from lack of blood flow to the brain!  Needless to say, while we Slept together, we never had penetrating intercourse.
 
As for "optimal" size range - 6.5 to 8 inches, with a mid-range circumfrence.  To chubby and it becomes painful in a hurry, despite natural childbirth twice.  And pencil dicks simply annoy me.

_____________________________

Rhi
Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Essential Scentsations

(in reply to pixidustpet)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 8:26:05 PM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
Score one for the advantage guys have in sex that this thread would suggest.

I could be wrong, but I don't ever remember guys having in-depth discusssion about the size of a pussy.   Might make for an interesting thread. At least no guy I know has ever turned down sex because a woman's "treasure" was too small or too big, but lots of conversation on availability. 
 
With some guys, I think,  it would take a case of leprosy to turn off sexual interest, and than only if it had spread to the groin area.    

(in reply to servantheart)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 9:11:50 PM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline
Probably because unlike penises, vaginas are not a static size, but can stretch to accomodate many things.  Although I have heard some complain about chicks that are too loose.


Cali


_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 10:12:24 PM   
MarsBonfire


Posts: 1034
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
And larger vaginas have options... fisting for example.

Again, we end up with a thread that veers off into the mechanics of the act, and totally ignores the emotional and spiritual sides to human sexuality. (sigh)

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 11:18:02 PM   
MsLadySue


Posts: 2254
Joined: 12/18/2004
Status: offline
Trouble with trying to come up with an ideal size, I would need three different sizes depending on where it goes.

_____________________________

In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion.
I love it when someone insults me. That means I don't have to be nice anymore.

(in reply to MarsBonfire)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/11/2009 11:34:11 PM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MarsBonfire
Again, we end up with a thread that veers off into the mechanics of the act, and totally ignores the emotional and spiritual sides to human sexuality. (sigh)


Actually, the OP, in his followup, explained that he and his friends believe there is a device that, with regular use, will enlarge their penises.  They want to know what size they should be aiming for as "ideal."

He's the only one who speaks English, so he's the spokesperson.

I don't think that discussing the emotional or spiritual issues regarding sexuality would be particularly helpful to them. *shrugs*

Cali


_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to MarsBonfire)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/12/2009 3:55:19 AM   
MadAxeman


Posts: 4171
Joined: 8/28/2008
From: UK
Status: offline
And it oscillates.
He should concentrate on developing that rather than size.



_____________________________

Hitman for the Subby Mafia

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/12/2009 4:26:49 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beargonewild

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dastan

"...tell me and the guys where the peak of the Everest is set at to know how high one must climb to be on top of the rest of the world"


The idea size of cock is one that I don't choke while deep throating and doesn't split me in half during anal intercourse.




....what he said.

(in reply to beargonewild)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/12/2009 4:30:29 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hizgeorgiapeach

While it may all be a matter of personal preference, I am Not amongst those who think it's all in what's done with it/size is irrelevant.  I freely admit that as far as I'm concerned size Does matter.  (And to all you guys out there who've spent so long trying to convince us all that it doesn't - thanks for Nothing.)
 
If it's less than 5 - I won't bother wasting my time with it, because I've learned from experience that I'll end up being bored and yawning halfway through, before he ever gets close to being finished.  Well - let me amend that.  I won't bother unless he can breath through his ears and has a serious oral fetish on the giving end.  More than 9 and it becomes nitemarish.  I dated a guy during highschool who had a measured 10, and one that had a measured 13.  The guy with the 13 never once got a full erection during the time that I knew and dated him - any time he got close to that point he would (literally) pass out from lack of blood flow to the brain!  Needless to say, while we Slept together, we never had penetrating intercourse.
 
As for "optimal" size range - 6.5 to 8 inches, with a mid-range circumfrence.  To chubby and it becomes painful in a hurry, despite natural childbirth twice.  And pencil dicks simply annoy me.



a smaller guy tho tends to be more attentive.  ....attentive can be good.  

(in reply to hizgeorgiapeach)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/12/2009 4:39:22 AM   
came4U


Posts: 3572
Joined: 1/23/2007
From: London, Ontario
Status: offline
Man-meat that is as appropriate to his other body is fine with me.

Big hands in general = healthy size manparts.

I tend to look at a guys hands to see if he fits the bill. If not, nexxt.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/12/2009 5:17:30 AM   
mistoferin


Posts: 8284
Joined: 10/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dastan

Dear Ladies...

Thank you so much for your answers.....allow me now to explaina  problem we have here.

I am a single user, this is my private account, nobody reads it, nobody sees the posts. I don't quote, nor refer to anyone, but I happen to be the english-fluent part of a small club of men here who are interested in BDSM. We train together in sports and study together, and share the same similar trait for BDSM. And believe it or not, we don't see porn, we don't have masturbatory fantasies with picture galleries or stories...

My country is a wasteland of BDSM where it can be compared to practicing witchcraft out in the open for anyoen to see during the Dark Ages, here, I have scars from confessing to my now ex-girlfriend froma  2 years+ long relationship what my fantasies were. And I'm not the first and won't be the last guy chased into the street and exposed to shame as a thief surprised when fleeing the scene of his robbery and bearing marks for it.

As for sizes here, I will simply say based on the statistics here that the girth that Miss CalifChick and Mister Aravain commented on, the diameter here is fluctuating between 1,69 and 1,94 inches for the vast majority of us, with a circumference or girth of 5.38 to 5.71 inches, this is after translating the measurements.  I find myself  closer to the high end as most do in my region. Lenghts oscillate betwene 6.27 and 6.68 inches.

Now, thanks to some stupid mistake by a person who had a below average endowment and injured himself with a strange device purchased overseas, a clinical case I was able to see and read the file about, I sort of came to some conclusions and thanks to our studies on tissue formation inducents (my country is plagued by landmines, we have a war with bomb-loving guerrillas) we just found a way which a more advanced student used in need of it, and he had a small but appreciable gain, approximately 1 inch in 7 months, permament gain and still fully functional, which motivates us to ask in order to see how can we sort of enhance ourselves to match the best or the ideal parameters to become better, just as we have used new techniques and devices as well as stimulation to enhance our bodies to a better aesthetic and athletic performance.

So all in all, your wonderful replies about size have been greatly useful, but we wish to learn more and hear more so as to have a small statistic, at least 100 opinions of measurements that allow us to have our own chart and know what the expectations are. So far, we conclude the 7-8 inch lenght is the desirable measurement, but we wonder...why is it that a number of websites and women forums mention as ideal penises of 8+ inches to 9,5 (9 and 1/2) inches in lenght ? That is soemwhat bigger and would mean the cervix stimulation is stronger and requires more caution.


Am I the only one who is absolutely amazed that ANYONE would put this much thought into this issue???

_____________________________

Peace and light,
~erin~

There are no victims here...only volunteers.

When you make a habit of playing on the tracks, you thereby forfeit the right to bitch when you get hit by a train.

"I did it! I admit it and I'm gonna do it again!"

(in reply to Dastan)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? - 1/12/2009 5:50:39 AM   
CarrieO


Posts: 2432
Joined: 1/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mistoferin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dastan

Dear Ladies...

Thank you so much for your answers.....allow me now to explaina  problem we have here.

I am a single user, this is my private account, nobody reads it, nobody sees the posts. I don't quote, nor refer to anyone, but I happen to be the english-fluent part of a small club of men here who are interested in BDSM. We train together in sports and study together, and share the same similar trait for BDSM. And believe it or not, we don't see porn, we don't have masturbatory fantasies with picture galleries or stories...

My country is a wasteland of BDSM where it can be compared to practicing witchcraft out in the open for anyoen to see during the Dark Ages, here, I have scars from confessing to my now ex-girlfriend froma  2 years+ long relationship what my fantasies were. And I'm not the first and won't be the last guy chased into the street and exposed to shame as a thief surprised when fleeing the scene of his robbery and bearing marks for it.

As for sizes here, I will simply say based on the statistics here that the girth that Miss CalifChick and Mister Aravain commented on, the diameter here is fluctuating between 1,69 and 1,94 inches for the vast majority of us, with a circumference or girth of 5.38 to 5.71 inches, this is after translating the measurements.  I find myself  closer to the high end as most do in my region. Lenghts oscillate betwene 6.27 and 6.68 inches.

Now, thanks to some stupid mistake by a person who had a below average endowment and injured himself with a strange device purchased overseas, a clinical case I was able to see and read the file about, I sort of came to some conclusions and thanks to our studies on tissue formation inducents (my country is plagued by landmines, we have a war with bomb-loving guerrillas) we just found a way which a more advanced student used in need of it, and he had a small but appreciable gain, approximately 1 inch in 7 months, permament gain and still fully functional, which motivates us to ask in order to see how can we sort of enhance ourselves to match the best or the ideal parameters to become better, just as we have used new techniques and devices as well as stimulation to enhance our bodies to a better aesthetic and athletic performance.

So all in all, your wonderful replies about size have been greatly useful, but we wish to learn more and hear more so as to have a small statistic, at least 100 opinions of measurements that allow us to have our own chart and know what the expectations are. So far, we conclude the 7-8 inch lenght is the desirable measurement, but we wonder...why is it that a number of websites and women forums mention as ideal penises of 8+ inches to 9,5 (9 and 1/2) inches in lenght ? That is soemwhat bigger and would mean the cervix stimulation is stronger and requires more caution.


Am I the only one who is absolutely amazed that ANYONE would put this much thought into this issue???


Actually, I was wondering if anyone felt like they were taking part in a focus group? 


< Message edited by CarrieO -- 1/12/2009 5:51:42 AM >


_____________________________

"No matter what happens in the kitchen, never apologize"~Julia Child~


(in reply to mistoferin)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The Ideal Measurement of Manhood ? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094