RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls?

RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

HisBestGirl -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (12/29/2008 1:38:42 AM)
My Daddy owns me in every D/s & M/s sense of the matter :) Although I don't tend to label things that succinctly; I prefer to blur the lines. I am collared and branded with his mark; definite signs of ownership (the brand went a long way to reaffirm this ownership) and I call him Daddy, despite our relationship not being purely age-play based; it is more due to his style of dominance and my own predisposition to acting little-girlish (and loving toys and cartoons) that brought this about. To surmise; the man owns, heart and soul.

mandyjean -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (12/29/2008 7:43:31 AM)
I am a slave to my Daddy Dom/Master and I consider myself completely owned. Our ages are very close - the Daddy/gurl relationship has much more to do with mindset than age. What is important is what works for you. If your girl feels owned then they obviously feel a true sense of belonging. I think that it was an incredible compliment to you, especially since it was not something that you expected. Hopefully it will help you to see the full extent of your responsibility. You have your sub's full trust in you and there are few gifts more precious than that.

torkinkycouple -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/2/2009 7:00:22 AM)
Question to OP: Why don't you take a seat right over there?

kuriouswitch -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/2/2009 9:47:07 AM)
Master and I will age play sometimes which is slightly different from my understanding of Daddy/daughter relationships. but in my opinion it depends on what the two of you want. If you're comfortable with the idea of owning and being a Daddy/Mommy then go for it, but you can also be in a Daddy/daughter relationship without the ownership aspect or even the D/s ect. It just depends on what you and they are comfortable with.

breatheasone -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/2/2009 10:56:13 AM)
i was/am Daddy's slave/property 1st....then came the Daddy/littleone dynamic....It was and is, a VERY natural thing for Us and, honestly not even anything either one of us was looking for. Having said that, i can't imagine not having my "Daddy".

RavenMuse -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/2/2009 12:39:53 PM)
When this relationship first started it was our compatability for a 24/7 TPE M/s relationship that drew both of Us. After a few months We noticed strong elements of D/lg where emerging as the relationship developed. Now I do have a paternal streak but this was far stronger than I've encountered before. I don't "roleplay" neither does she, it is simply one of the ways in which We interact, especialy if she is scared or insecure and I'm providing reasurance/comfort. But "Daddy" came natural to her lips and felt right so I allowed it and the D/lg aspect was simply integrated into our lives as part of the M/s relationship. Of course she isn't a brat, she is Daddys good girl which is entirely compatable with being Owned.

breatheasone -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/2/2009 3:27:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RavenMuse When this relationship first started it was our compatability for a 24/7 TPE M/s relationship that drew both of Us. After a few months We noticed strong elements of D/lg where emerging as the relationship developed. Now I do have a paternal streak but this was far stronger than I've encountered before. I don't "roleplay" neither does she, it is simply one of the ways in which We interact, especialy if she is scared or insecure and I'm providing reasurance/comfort. But "Daddy" came natural to her lips and felt right so I allowed it and the D/lg aspect was simply integrated into our lives as part of the M/s relationship. Of course she isn't a brat, she is Daddys good girl which is entirely compatable with being Owned. This is WEIRD lol because its almost exactly how this unfolded for Daddy and me. Edited to add: We don't role play either. i'm not saying we won't ever, We just haven't as of yet.

LeatherBentOne -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/2/2009 4:15:07 PM)
To OP: Did you consider that eventho she is not owned according to your definition, that she may "feel" as if she is owned, based on the comfort level and security you provide? Or maybe, in some way the term is being used to best describe her feelings based on something you have asked her to do or not do, rather than use the term to define the relationship? Perhaps, she is unable to describe her feelings toward you and this is the best she can do for now? Glad to know you are both happy, LBO

Zechriel -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/2/2009 6:24:46 PM)
Good evening! We have both a Master/slave and Daddy/baby girl relationship. The lines gets blurred from minute to minute too! lol I mean, I don't talk baby talk or wear little dresses or anything, more like feelings we have inside. Some days/times he can be very Dominant and strict and I know then to call him Master. But other times he will cuddle me and spoil me and I can call him Daddy. I say slave cause I cannot turn off my feelings for him, for caring for him, for wanting to take care of him. Even when I am home or shopping, I can call and see if he needs anything. I am totally about him. To me, sub means I can turn it off and go on with life, I cannot, I care for people too much. He owns me, but I am a person not property. I am collared and will ask permission for anything I want to do or not to do. I always have the option of asking for something but "no pouting!" if he says no, lol. I have no limits but he does so I trust him to enforce his limits on both of us. THAT really scared me but I am learning to understand it. I had them before but after a horrible argument where I begged to stay with him promising "I would do anything"...he said yes anything. But I learned-after a few days of being so scared-that it meant HIS limits had not changed so basically I was back where I was before. ::whew!! :: He just wanted that trust from his slave in him. I hope that helps, just the way it is in our realtionship, like in my profile I wrote, He is both and has taught me to shine as both as well. Good luck!! Love, Zechriel [sm=couple.gif]

Jeptha -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/3/2009 8:57:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MaamJay I'm probably not the right person to post here as Master and i only age play in short bursts, rather than sustaining a Daddy/girl relationship. ... Same here. I've played with this only as another way of expressing and exploring the D/s dynamic in general. We might play with almost any feasible relationship structure that can be interpretted to feature a power imbalance (the daddy/daughter one haviing, for us, a lot of potential in that direction), so the idea of ownership is kind of always in the background.

swtslutMM -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/3/2009 9:53:53 AM)
To keep it short and simple... i am very very owned by my Daddy. Thankfully so !! [:D]

porcelaine -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/3/2009 10:45:42 AM)
it is merely a way of relating as opposed to a fetish or particular dynamic employed. i'm multifaceted and the child is merely a part of me. i do not intentionally seek an older man to provide the Daddy component, in fact it is generally the reverse. i prefer men close in age or slightly younger, because i'm looking at the relational aspect first and foremost before any exchange occurs. in a partnership where ownership occurred, i would consider myself both his property and his little girl. different manifestations of yielding, yet complimentary and parallel in occurrence. both are always present. porcelaine

camille65 -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/3/2009 12:38:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrDevlin There are always exceptions, and people play at any and everything, but...Yes, by the terms employed, Daddys and their girls are from different generations. While I can, and do have conversations with my younger female "contacts", the focus is the game, apart from mutual sexual fulfillment, we don't share very much. I tend to think the difference adds as much as it detracts. They "hang out" with people their own age, not with me. And yes, having a bunch of miles on me but still into submissive females, especially younger, I'm a Daddy. I do have repeat encounters or sessions, but no, I don't collar/hold subs, ...so far. I have to disagree with you. Every Daddy/little girl couple that I have known has been of the same generation. The little girl usually has nothing to do with age, it is a mindset and oft times a psychological need instead of biological age. My owner is 12 years older than I am, he is also the oldest man I've been with to date. Usually they've been within a few years of my age. Now if you are talking about 'sugar daddies' then yes typically that refers to an older man with younger female, but a sugar daddy is not the same thing as a D/s daddy. To the OP. Yes he owns me and I am so very glad that he does!

Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/3/2009 5:18:32 PM)
Yes and No. It's like asking if a glass of water is half empty or half full.

breatheasone -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/4/2009 1:53:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: camille65 quote: ORIGINAL: MrDevlin There are always exceptions, and people play at any and everything, but...Yes, by the terms employed, Daddys and their girls are from different generations. While I can, and do have conversations with my younger female "contacts", the focus is the game, apart from mutual sexual fulfillment, we don't share very much. I tend to think the difference adds as much as it detracts. They "hang out" with people their own age, not with me. And yes, having a bunch of miles on me but still into submissive females, especially younger, I'm a Daddy. I do have repeat encounters or sessions, but no, I don't collar/hold subs, ...so far. I have to disagree with you. Every Daddy/little girl couple that I have known has been of the same generation. The little girl usually has nothing to do with age, it is a mindset and oft times a psychological need instead of biological age. My owner is 12 years older than I am, he is also the oldest man I've been with to date. Usually they've been within a few years of my age. Now if you are talking about 'sugar daddies' then yes typically that refers to an older man with younger female, but a sugar daddy is not the same thing as a D/s daddy. To the OP. Yes he owns me and I am so very glad that he does! Very well said camille... i haven't seen anything that even comes close to suggesting the Daddy/little girl relationships are from different generations... my Daddy is older than me...but not a lot only 8 years

Sunnyfey -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/4/2009 2:00:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: swtslutMM To keep it short and simple... i am very very owned by my Daddy. Thankfully so !! [:D] Ditto!!!

sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Question to Daddies: Do you own your little girls? (5/4/2009 7:03:04 AM)
Daddy does own me and we are equal partners and friends as well.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.125