Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: beware the reality check.........


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: beware the reality check......... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 6:00:38 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
I heard on the radio the other day that he had promised Bush that he will procede with placing missiles in Poland and a radar site in Czech. If that is true, the honeymoon is over as far as I'm concerned, he's just another representative of the American military-industrialcomplex and I want him out of my backyard.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 6:12:13 AM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BlackPhx

Yanno, I don't know about anyone else, but I don't expect Big Daddy Obama or any other Sugar daddy to waltz in wave a magic wand and miraculously cure all the ills our economy or society suffers from. It took a long time to topple this line of dominoes, it's going to take a bit to stand them all back up again. Despite what the naysayers and gloom mongers have to say Obama has already accomplished FOUR measures of change.
1. He is the second Youngest President ever. JFK was 43 to his 47.
2. He is the first African American to ever hold the office of President, proving once and for all that anyone CAN aspire to the office.
3. He broke the ennui that this country was in regarding voting. Most Precincts reported more than 80% turn out where 50% was normal.
4. He has inspired hope around the world for this country after the ill will that Bush earned us in the past 8 years.

You know, that is pretty damned good for someone who hasn't even been sworn in, yet. Yes he is going to have to hit the ground running, but you know McCain would have had to as well. At least Obamas VP Biden doesn't need to take remedial Social Studies and Geography classes.

No one is going to be completely happy with his team, rarely is it going to be the team they would have chosen. BUT he is choosing people he feels will fill in the areas he is weakest in. That is the smartest move he can make.

Now, can we PLEASE, just get behind the Office if not the man and try to pull this country out of the spiral it has been in for the last 20 years? There are no magic wands, no magic solutions and if we don't make the effort, we are going to be sold to the highest bidder, just to keep food on the table.

poenkitten



poenkitten, even though many SAY they don't believe in GOD, many sure act
like they expect our next President to perform miracles.

"""Wake up call people"""!!!  America is on the brink of collapsing!
Bank bail outs, housing bail outs, Wall street sinking daily, rising unemployment,
States need bail outs, everybody needs a bail out, we are in 2 wars, people.

Do people have a clue how bad shit is right now?
As far as I am concerned we are on the brink of disaster.
Has anyone else NOTICED how bad things are right now in America?
Does anyone really know what time it is? Does anyone care?

If President-elect takes us off the edge of disaster and takes us back even
500 feet, he has done a great job, as far as many of us are concerned.

< Message edited by MzMia -- 11/9/2008 6:17:09 AM >


_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to BlackPhx)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 6:15:34 AM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Obama is THE most liberal guy in the country.  When he breaths the argon that expells is loaded liberal,  almost like a dragon breath fire.

First of all, argon is a trace element in our atmosphere.  You'd expel very little of it.  Second, there's a declared socialist in the Senate (Bernie Sanders). No one would be left of him.

Third, I've lost track of how many folks are repeating the line about "most liberal in the [name organization here]".  It comes from the National Journal, and is taken out of context (please see here for the full story).

"National Journal's vote ratings became an issue in the 2004 general election, when Republicans used the magazine's ranking of John Kerry as the most liberal senator of 2003 to label the then-Democratic nominee as the "most liberal senator" -- even though that was his rating for just that one year, when (like Obama did) he missed quite a few Senate votes due to being on the presidential campaign trail.

As National Journal's editor wrote back then, "[O]ur magazine -- or, more precisely, our annual congressional vote ratings edition -- has become a Republican talking point in the 2004 presidential campaign. And that's been a fascinating, and disconcerting, experience. Fascinating because we're more used to being cited in congressional hearings than on the Today show. Disconcerting because the shorthand used to describe our ratings of Kerry and Edwards is sometimes misleading -- or just plain wrong."

Indeed, while Obama ranks as the magazine's most liberal senator of 2007, his ranking was 16th in 2005 and 10th in 2006.

Another question that might come up is why the magazine released its voting ratings now -- just days before Super Tuesday. In fact, the magazine says it full congressional ratings won't come out until March. But, according to the editor in a Q&A published in the magazine: "Back in December, we decided that we would publish the ratings of the presidential candidates as soon as they became available, rather than wait until our annual Vote Ratings issue on March 8. We thought it would be irresponsible to keep those scores under wraps during the height of the presidential primary season."

As for McCain, the magazine says that he didn't vote frequently enough in 2007 to get an overall rating. Per National Journal, "He missed more than half of the votes in both the economic and foreign-policy categories. On social issues, which include immigration, McCain received a conservative score of 59."
thornhappy


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 6:56:24 AM   
FullCircle


Posts: 5713
Joined: 11/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen
And everything went fairly well for the honeymoon period, but then the feeling began to change as time went on and various things came up that didnt show New Labour in the best light. All this culminated in the exasperatingly mysterious decision to support Bush in the Iraq invasion - against which thousands demonstrated, government ministers resigned and there was almost univeral resistance for a whole host of reasons that have been thrashed out here a million times.


Being in opposition is one thing and being in power is quite another. In over ten years of government mistakes will be made, there is no doubt about that. The only differences is how much political capital the opposition can make out of those mistakes. The Tories had some good leaders who would try to focus on such mistakes but people were never ready to go back to the conservatives and every time they thought they were some MP in Labour would ask: "well what is their policy on Europe?" The other thing that has continuously annoyed me about Labour, even though I've always voted Labour, I hate the fact they think I'm stupid enough to blame all our problems on what the conservatives did when they were in power. It's a falacy because I remember that economically we weren't in bad shape. The problem with the conservatives and the reason no one liked them was because they were hypocrites with their family values platform or the fact they were completely heartless when it came to suffering on the NHS. Whenever Virginia Bottomly was in the news it was because she was closing down a hospital somewhere.

You can always make political capital

Labour will say: "Gordon Brown is the best man to steer us through this economic crisis just look at his record as chancellor of the exchequer."

Tories will say: "What is happening now proves he didn't fix the roof when the sun was shining."

The truth is somewhere in-between because no single world leader can fix the world economy and yes the conservatives demutualised building societies and reduced regulation but who didn't reverse those things when they had ten years to do so?

I'd like to know if what we are currently experiencing counts as boom or bust because although we were promised no more of it I've never actually known what it is if not this?

In my opinion these are the good things Labour have done in their time:

Invested heavily on the NHS and measured performance (maybe overzealously)
Invested in education and measured the performance of teachers and children (there is now a whole generation that would have lost all their hair through stress before even leaving primary school and we always suspect standards are slipping even when they do well)
Brought Railtrack back into public ownership
Gave the BoE freedom to set interest rates
Made it easier (not much) for key workers to afford housing
Gave people devolved power
Afghan war (this is where the terrorists trained this is where we should have concentrated the efforts)

In my opinion these are the bad things Labour have done in their time:

Allowed the DNA database to cover people that were never charged with a crime or were acquitted
Proposed the use of ID cards
Lost personal data and breached the data protection act on various occasions
Extended how long people can be held without charge
Complicated the tax laws making the documents now measured in inches rather than pages
Created far more new unnecessary laws than any other government in UK history
Gave heartless people that want to bury news positions in power
Iraq war (the only terrorists found here were the ones that came to make a stand against us they would have done the same in Afghanistan if we'd sent more there instead)
Gave Peter Mandelson any position in power EU, UK why can’t they make him Iraqi ambassador to the UK or something like that?
Promised Africa everything and gave them little or nothing as always.


_____________________________

ﮒuקּƹɼ ƾɛϰưϫԼ Ƨωιϯϲћ.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 7:06:34 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Beware the reality check - the opposition will certainly make much of it as will its allied media.


That's not how it works here---they start attacking him immediately rather than waiting for any actual misstep.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 7:10:46 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Obama is THE most liberal guy in the country.  When he breaths the argon that expells is loaded liberal,  almost like a dragon breath fire.

First of all, argon is a trace element in our atmosphere.  You'd expel very little of it.  Second, there's a declared socialist in the Senate (Bernie Sanders). No one would be left of him.

Third, I've lost track of how many folks are repeating the line about "most liberal in the [name organization here]".  It comes from the National Journal, and is taken out of context (please see here for the full story).

"National Journal's vote ratings became an issue in the 2004 general election, when Republicans used the magazine's ranking of John Kerry as the most liberal senator of 2003 to label the then-Democratic nominee as the "most liberal senator" -- even though that was his rating for just that one year, when (like Obama did) he missed quite a few Senate votes due to being on the presidential campaign trail.

As National Journal's editor wrote back then, "[O]ur magazine -- or, more precisely, our annual congressional vote ratings edition -- has become a Republican talking point in the 2004 presidential campaign. And that's been a fascinating, and disconcerting, experience. Fascinating because we're more used to being cited in congressional hearings than on the Today show. Disconcerting because the shorthand used to describe our ratings of Kerry and Edwards is sometimes misleading -- or just plain wrong."

Indeed, while Obama ranks as the magazine's most liberal senator of 2007, his ranking was 16th in 2005 and 10th in 2006.

Another question that might come up is why the magazine released its voting ratings now -- just days before Super Tuesday. In fact, the magazine says it full congressional ratings won't come out until March. But, according to the editor in a Q&A published in the magazine: "Back in December, we decided that we would publish the ratings of the presidential candidates as soon as they became available, rather than wait until our annual Vote Ratings issue on March 8. We thought it would be irresponsible to keep those scores under wraps during the height of the presidential primary season."

As for McCain, the magazine says that he didn't vote frequently enough in 2007 to get an overall rating. Per National Journal, "He missed more than half of the votes in both the economic and foreign-policy categories. On social issues, which include immigration, McCain received a conservative score of 59."
thornhappy




Hi Thorn,  you are correct about argon gas.   Quite interesting.

I like Obama, so I wasnt bashing him in that post.

Sarcasm.

More to the point, does anyone even recognize what a conservative is in 2008?   I dont.   and as a side effect- what does that do to the liberal point of view?  Being that conservative is so out of whack, it validates the liberal point of view right now.

Lets look at it in terms of empire.    Which line of thought want MORE empire?  and which one wants LESS.

Well they both are so convoluted that they both want MORE empire.

That would be fine if we as a nation actually produced anything.  But we dont.  we manage it.  or to be sure, we mismanage it.  ie the bail outs.

People want to turn the page on bush.

Sadly tho-  Obama wont.

Not really.

The true voice of Ron Paul, would have worked.

So as to the prex 6 of one, half dozen of the other.

ToAyto, tomoto,

boxers or briefs.

paper of plastic

do you want fries with that?

Bush said that he did not beleive in nation building.  He said exit strategy.

We the people are stupider then cows.  We have NO attention span.  Of you do- then you are the fringe.
..even crazy.

everything is planned for you my friend.





(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 7:56:39 AM   
Evility


Posts: 915
Joined: 12/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes
I'm just afraid that he's been so built up to be almost the second coming of Christ, that when he takes office and shows that he's actually just a human being and a politician, it's going to be a major letdown.


It will all be blamed on his predecessor. That's how politics works usually. If things improve the incumbent takes or gets credit and if things do not improve or get worse the predecessor's policies are to blame. It happens on both sides of the aisle and both parties are equally culpable. It will be no different in the coming administration than it has been in any in my lifetime in this regard.

I didn't support Obama so I won't be disappointed if things don't pan out. By the same token, if he does a good job I will be the first to admit it and commend him. I am looking forward to the whole 'Second Coming' experience only in that it will once again show that personal effort and accountability are the only ways to succeed in life.

(in reply to windchymes)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 9:51:21 AM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
My goal has already been reached; a change of political party.
Whether that will result in positive change for the country remains to be seen, but at least now there is a chance!

_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 9:53:33 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

He is the second Youngest President ever. JFK was 43 to his 47.


Theodore Roosevelt was 42 when he became President.

(in reply to BlackPhx)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: beware the reality check......... - 11/9/2008 11:02:55 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Beware the reality check - the opposition will certainly make much of it as will its allied media.



       But that isn't where the danger is, LadyE.  I'm not going to start raining on the Dem parade just yet, but it will get rained on.  Obama got the youth vote, 25% of his total, according to one of the network shows this morning.  They are an instant gratification generation.  The threat now is buyer's remorse, and that they will turn on him.

        With the last eight years teaching these newly engaged voters the accepted tone for expressing dissent, it won't be pretty at all.

      

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 30
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: beware the reality check......... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.031